Iran has about 1% the United States' military budget. If they tried to attack the United States, they would be utterly demolished within hours; ergo, they are not a threat. Beyond that, why don't you ask your friend to produce a single precedent, anywhere in all the annals of history, for such a remarkable event as a tiny third-world country trying to invade the undisputed global hyperpower? I do not think it is an exaggeration to say that an Iranian invasion of the US would constitute the single most asinine military offensive ever launched.Hey everyone,
My cousin and I would like your help to prove to our neo-con friend that Iran is not a threat. This is our basic case so far:
1. Iran has never once mentioned any hostility towards the United States.
2. Iran is years away from a nuclear weapon. (Heard RP say this, but does anyone know of any sources).
3. Ahmadinejad never said he intended to "wipe Israel off the face of the earth."
4. Iran can't even afford enough gasoline for themselves: how could they afford a war? (Sources please).
5. Iran isn't suicidal. Why would they attack the worlds largest superpower?
Hope you guys can provide some quality articles, etc.
You can't prove a negative? Prove that there isn't an ice cream factory on Jupiter.
Burden of proof is on the assertion that Iran is a threat.
Hope you guys can provide some quality articles, etc.
Iran: Our satellite photographed Israel's Dimona reactor, IDF bases
the Iranian website Mashreq claimed that the recently launched Navid-class satellite was able to take detailed photographs of the nuclear reactor in Dimona as well as "sensitive sites, air forces bases, and various areas of Tel Aviv."
Although 100% true, that will not convince your 'average' person who sees the burden of proof as a mere technicality rather than the logical imperative it is.