Problems are reported with the Washoe County results of the Nevada GOP presidential caucus

http://www.rgj.com/article/20120204/NEWS19/120204009/Problems-reported-GOP-caucus-results-Washoe
Problems are reported with the Washoe County results of the Nevada GOP presidential caucus, the chairman of the Washoe GOP said.

“The state is screwing up the reporting of the Washoe results,” Washoe GOP Chairman Dave Buell said of the Nevada State Republican party. “Washoe has reported the correct results, but they (state party officials) can’t seem to get it right.”

The RGJ is contacting the state GOP for a response.

Buell has tried to fix the problem by reporting the correct Washoe results directly to the Reno Gazette-Journal, The Associated Press and ABC News, Buell said.

“We finally went around the state party, and I just gave the results to The AP,’ Buell said. “They asked for precinct by precinct so we sent them all of the precinct information, too. AP ought to be getting that out soon.”

Washoe’s official results are Romney 42 percent (2,836 votes), Gingrich 28 percent (1,876 votes), Paul 17 percent (1,168 votes) and Santorum 12 percent (817 votes).
Click to expand...
 
Washoe’s official results are Romney 42 percent (2,836 votes), Gingrich 28 percent (1,876 votes), Paul 17 percent (1,168 votes) and Santorum 12 percent (817 votes).
Click to expand...

How do these stack up to the votes the GOP is reporting??
 
Washoe County:
Ron 2008-1317 votes (14%)
Ron 2012-1168 (17%); -149 votes; +3% points
Mittens 2008-4032 votes (44%)
Mittens 2012-2836 votes (42%); -1196 votes; -2% points

The Nevada GOP's claim of Washoe County this year compared to last year.
 
Interesting. I *HIGHLY* doubt Buell is a Ron Paul supporter, but at least he wants the REAL results published!
 
NCGOPer_for_Paul said:
Those numbers are what CNN and the Google numbers are. Nothing wrong NOW.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure those where the ones the Washoe county GOP was saying were right, the article says those are the 'official' ones, and the official ones are the ones out of the NVGOP on google. I THINK the article is saying Washoe thinks the official ones are not correct - but doesn't give what they think is right.

But obviously, that is just my interpretation.
 
sailingaway said:
I'm not sure those where the ones the Washoe county GOP was saying were right, the article says those are the 'official' ones, and the official ones are the ones out of the NVGOP on google. I THINK the article is saying Washoe thinks the official ones are not correct - but doesn't give what they think is right.

But obviously, that is just my interpretation.
Click to expand...

i interpreted it this way too.
 
sailingaway said:
I'm not sure those where the ones the Washoe county GOP was saying were right, the article says those are the 'official' ones, and the official ones are the ones out of the NVGOP on google. I THINK the article is saying Washoe thinks the official ones are not correct - but doesn't give what they think is right.

But obviously, that is just my interpretation.
Click to expand...

Same... Did they shut up the chairman so that the chairman agrees with the officials now? Or is there still a problem? Or were the numbers REALLY corrected? All remains unanswered.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Occam's Banana
The American right is falling out of love with Israel
2
Replies
34
Views
643
unknown
unknown
jmdrake
Leftist Doctor HIDES Puberty Blockers STUDY For TEENS B/c Of UNDESIRED Results
Replies
9
Views
4K
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
PAF
The Great Retreat: How Trump and Harris Are Looking Backward
Replies
2
Views
3K
CCTelander
C
I
David Stockman, "The Myth of the MAGA Economy"
Replies
2
Views
1K
PAF
PAF
J
Democrats Boldly Announcing the Fix for 2022: Why Are GOP Reps Sitting with Thumbs Up Butts?
Replies
0
Views
171
James_Madison_Lives
J
Back
Top