"Pro Liberty Activists" Descend on Granite State (feat ron paul rep Mark Warden)

muzzled dogg

Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
7,721
this article features rep. mark warden who endorsed ron paul for president and was just reelected as state rep

December 13. 2012 11:10AM
Free State Project participants have 101 reasons to move to N.H.
By Henry Metz and Dan Moberger
Neighborhood News


Editor’s note: This is the first in a series that will explore the Free State Project. This week, we look at who Free Staters are and why they choose to live in New Hampshire.

It is a movement that began outside of New Hampshire by a group of people who describe themselves as “pro-liberty activists,” and in 2003 they made the decision to call New Hampshire their home.

They are participants in what is called the Free State Project, an organized effort to get 20,000 libertarian-leaning individuals to weave their way into the Granite State’s political, social and business tapestry.

Formed out of a belief that government – as stated on the group’s website – exists “at most to protect people’s rights, and should neither provide for people nor punish them for activities that interfere with no one else,” the Free State Project has, thus far, brought approximately 1,100 people to New Hampshire from other parts of the country.

State Rep. Mark Warden is one of those people. A citizen of the Granite State since 2007, Warden recently won election to a second term in the state Legislature, where he represents Goffstown, Weare and Deering.

“I moved here from Las Vegas, Nev.,” said Warden, a real estate agent. “I was single – I still am – and so it was fairly easy for me to just pick up and leave. I was involved in new home construction in Nevada, and I was getting more and more interested in becoming an activist. Overall, I love it here. The winters are cold, but the scenery is beautiful.”

Warden, like many other Free State participants, found that the scenery wasn’t the only thing that attracted him to New Hampshire. He left Nevada for many reasons, not the least of which was New Hampshire’s tax policies – specifically, the lack of an income and sales tax, as well as no capital gains tax.

Freedom from taxes is included in a list of 101 reasons why Free Staters should move to New Hampshire, according to the organization’s website.

In fact, taxes – or a lack of them – figure heavily in what the Free State Project considers the leading virtues of the Granite State. New Hampshire has no inventory tax, the list points out, nor does it have a tax on “machinery or equipment.”

The fact that motorcyclists need not wear a helmet and adults need not wear seatbelts also make the list, as does the fact that New Hampshire has some of the least restrictive gun laws in the nation.

For Warden, who in the most recent election defeated Granite State native Aaron Gill, New Hampshire is an ideal state to pursue the ideals of the Free State Project.

Warden bristles – only slightly – when it’s suggested that Free State participants are little more than libertarians with an updated mission statement and goal.

“That’s a bit of an oversimplification” he said. “But certainly there are libertarian-leaning participants among the Free Staters who are mostly people with families and good paying jobs who take a nonviolent, nonaggressive approach and who believe that less government is better government.”

Warden believes government creates more problems than it solves, a view echoed by the Free State Project’s official literature.

“The government, typically, when it tries to solve something only makes it worse,” said Warden.
A like-minded thinker is Brian Wright, 63, who’s been associated with the libertarian cause for more than a decade. Wright is more free-spoken when it comes to making the connection between the Free State Project and the libertarian movement, saying that almost 100 percent of Free Staters agree with the libertarian platform. As for Free Staters in the state Legislature, Wright puts the number at between 15 and 20 who are currently serving in the House of Representatives.

Wright currently lives in Michigan to take care of his ailing mother, but retains a residence in Merrimack and writes a blog called the Coffee Coaster, which focuses on Libertarian ideas and commentary. When he first came to New Hampshire for the Free State Project, he lived in New Boston.

“Because of the way the two-party system and the political structure is constructed, it’s very hard” for libertarians to gain a foothold in any state, Wright said. “We’re such a minority, relative to the rest of the population ... so the idea behind the Free State Project was to improve our numbers, percentage-wise, relative to people who are politically active in a given region.”

And that’s, in part, why New Hampshire presents such an appealing prospect for Free Staters. With a relatively small population and an established libertarian ethic among the state’s political and business establishment, Free Staters find a natural affinity between New Hampshire and Free Staters’ ideals and aspirations.

“It’s a big quality of life thing, too – New Hampshire is just a great place to live,” said Wright. “We came in because we love the state. We love the idea of the state being one of the more freedom-oriented states that ever existed, and the vast majority of the people who live in New Hampshire are liberty-oriented.”

The difficulty that libertarians have getting themselves elected to public office is a real one, which is why many libertarians and Free Staters will run on a Republican Party ticket, Wright pointed out.

“More likely they’re going to run as Republicans to get into the State House,” Wright said. “The perception of the Republican Party by some is it’s more respectful of property and ... economic freedom.”

And just what does economic freedom mean to the typical Free Stater?

Warden points to the new federal health care law as exhibit number one in the Free Staters’ argument against high taxation.

“Now it’s my responsibility to help my neighbor get health care?” Warden asked. “The federal health care law is yet another big government redistribution of wealth that will ultimately fail.”

When asked whether there are enough resources outside of government to create a social safety net for those unable, for whatever reasons, to care for themselves, Warden is unequivocal in his answer. “Yes,” he said. “The first safety net should be families. Second, we are a very charitable nation on whole, and we would have a lot more money to donate if we weren’t taxed so much.”

One concern that Warden has is the perception that the Free State Project is little more than an effort to take over the state’s political system.

“The Free State Project is not political,” said Warden. “They don’t encourage people to run, and they don’t go against candidates. Some Free State participants get involved politically, but others get involved through their church or some other groups, and some don’t do anything. They just live quietly, side by side with their neighbors, working hard and raising families.”

As a state legislator who happens to be a Free Stater, however, Warden does have his opinions about ways in which New Hampshire can improve its quality of life, and chief among these is pursuing a fiscally conservative political agenda.

“We need to look at the unfunded liabilities that are the pension and health insurance for state retirees that’s costing New Hampshire an estimated $4 billion,” said Warden. “That’s a financial burden on our children and grandchildren. It’s time we ask employees to pay a little more, to contribute a little more to these programs and for the state to be a little more innovative in how it administers these programs.”

Warden also cites what he terms as a “lack of good choices in education,” noting that the two teachers unions, the National Education Association and the American Teachers Association, present little more than a “monolithic structure” that doesn’t serve the interests of today’s students.

“The fact is that the education establishment hates competition to the detriment of students,” Warden said. “There needs to be more accountability for teachers and staff.”

As appealing as New Hampshire is to Free Staters, Warden said the state is not without its warts. As a state legislator, he said he would like to reduce the number of professions that require licensing.

“Government destroys jobs,” said Warden. “Reducing regulations and burdens on businesses allows entrepreneurship to flourish.

"In New Hampshire, there are over 150 professions requiring licenses – nail shops and manicurists, massage therapists. None of this ensures consumer protection. It’s just a way to generate fees and it prevents poor people from starting their own businesses.”

- Next week, we talk to longtime residents critical of the Free State movement.

- Henry Metz, [email protected], and Dan Moberger, [email protected]

http://www.unionleader.com/article/20121213/NEWHAMPSHIRE14/121219621/-1/news
 
next time they'll talk to those critical of the free state project.... that wasn't exactly PRO free state....

Good for Warden, though!
 
Remember Mark? He went on TV talking about his support of Ron Paul. He was on the radio. He was personally endorsed by the outgoing NH Speaker of the House.

He only received 49% of the vote in a 3 way race for his reelection. Don't worry, though. It isn't because people hate him. It's because a popular LP person also ran in the race. the LP candidate received about 13% of the votes.

BTW, if you live in the US, you may donate to Mark's reelection campaign in bitcoins. That's right, Mark is also the 1st candidate to take donations in bitcoins! Mark has a very big NH House district (by NH standards) so his campaigns are a lot more expensive than the typical $500 or so NH House campaigns. He could use your help.
http://www.markwarden.com/page/bitcoin-donation
button4.png
http://www.markwarden.com/page/bitcoin-donation
 
It's a no-brainer. Move to NH and work with a growing movement of liberty lovers to actually achieve freedom.

Or, stay where you are and watch liberty grow in NH as it continues to die where you live.
 
It's true... New Hampshire is where it's at for liberty. If you are interested in checking it out, the Free State Project Liberty Forum is coming up in February and is a fun time to meet people and hear great speakers (Tom Woods is a keynote this year)
 
It's true... New Hampshire is where it's at for liberty. If you are interested in checking it out, the Free State Project Liberty Forum is coming up in February and is a fun time to meet people and hear great speakers (Tom Woods is a keynote this year)

That's the 2013 Liberty Forum. Like on Facebook for the latest updates. https://www.facebook.com/LibertyForum

Attend it in real life :)
The 2013 New Hampshire Liberty Forum
February 21-24, 2013 - Crowne Plaza, Nashua, NH
http://freestateproject.org/libertyforum

Register NOW. It is only $99 for 4 days of fun for those over 18. For under 18, it is free.
However, prices will go up as it gets closer and closer to the event.
 
He only received 49% of the vote in a 3 way race for his reelection. Don't worry, though. It isn't because people hate him. It's because a popular LP person also ran in the race. the LP candidate received about 13% of the votes.
I'm sorry but this sort of thing is annoying as hell.
 
I'm sorry but this sort of thing is annoying as hell.

He spoke with her afterwords. It seems like they will work together to coordinate better next time. Hopefully that means he runs for reelection and she doesn't run in that district. I would like Lisa to stick with the local, non-partisan elections in her town. She is quite popular there.
 
Here is the follow up article.


December 20. 2012 10:41AM
Free State movement not embraced by all Granite Staters
By Henry Metz
http://www.unionleader.com/article/20121220/NEWHAMPSHIRE14/121229936&source=RSS

It is extremely long so I won't post it. Here is a blog post by a conservative on a the biggest conservative blog in NH about it.

Dec 27 2012
Aaron Gill Democrats free state Free Stater Narrative Gay Marriage Libertarians Mark Warden
Stupidity, Civility, And The Continued Assault on Free Staters
by Steve MacDonald
http://granitegrok.com/blog/2012/12...-continued-assault-on-free-staters#more-42295
Aaron’s also never responded to this issue, but having lost his race certainly shouldn’t absolve him of it. because I suspect he’ll try to run again. The whole out of state influence meme, where he takes money from out of state, thorough an out of state Internet fundraising portal, while pontificating on the value of local influence. Read it, it’s touching.

My second point, or perhaps my first if you are unclear what my first point was (as I am), is that the same article, “Free State Movement Not Embraced by All Granite Stater’s” (see also it’s companion article, “not everyone embraced the New Hampshire Democrat party”–which does not exist), is that the people interviewed for this piece (of work) are a RINO and two big government leeches, one of them who was less confused about his sexuality (he’s gay) than he was about whether or not he was a libertarian…he wasn’t.

I grant you it is an attack on the Free Staters, but it is just a weeeeeee…bit one-sided. There is nothing in it to denote how they eliminated the Democrats self admitted 800 million dollar deficit without raising taxes during the worst recession in history. Or is it the slowest recovery in history, I forget? There is nothing about the Free State’s influence on reducing the size of state government and there-by reapportioning that authority to local voters who may or may not want or even need to pay for things the state might have previously demanded of them.

It just assumes that if free staters are not Democrats, what good are they? Have you met New Hampshire Democrat? Free Staters, at least a few of whom don’t even like my views all that much, are a political pleasure in comparison.

They are just Libertarians who are essentially Conservatives with a varying grasp on the need or degree to which we require institutions; and what the size and role of those institutions should be to arrive at the ideal balance between a minimum amount of necessary government to protect rights and property and the goal of maximizing personal responsibility without chaos.

Some of us disagree on social issues at every or any level but that is mostly an internal debate about definitions. Arron Gill brings up the effort by ‘Free-Staters” to remove the state from marriage altogether, as a reason why he realized he’s a Democrat. I think that’s a waste of time. Without getting off on a long tangent, marriage is a religious ceremony with property rights implication which the state exists to protect. In fact, that is one of the states few reasons for even being–to protect personal property rights. A civil union is the same thing as a marriage but without religion. The state should see them the same way, and the people are free to meddle with the civil service details all it wants, but the religious service if off limits. The state has an interest in knowing who is married or ‘unioned’ so it can protect those property rights. Anything more than that, in my opinion, probably exceeds it’s mandate.

Where was I…?

Libertarians and Conservatives also agree that in most if not all cases these are decisions (civil services, abortion, etc) the Constitution left to the states and the people, and that these are where those discussion and the definitions themselves should be defined. By extension, we also believe (as previously noted) that the state should, whenever possible, defer decisions to the local governments, which is what they and the Tea Party Republicans tried to do. Remove the excessive cost burden of state government while giving local towns more control over that money and the power that goes with it.

You don’t exactly pull that off overnight but the past two years saw improvements in personal responsibility and local control, which the Democrats will now do their best to undo while smearing those who gave you more freedom and a more efficient, less expensive government.

So I am a bit perturbed at the tone of this article, which appears to be just another hit piece against the Free Staters, most of whom are not anarchists, and who should not be labeled as Republican Party infiltrators with a hidden agenda or as threats to New Hampshire’s pre ‘Free State’ way of life.

I would argue that most of the Republicans who are whining are simply the typical Scott Brown “Northeast variety” who have become more interested in drifting to the center to attract moderate voters (Brown has no choice in Mass by the way)–making it harder to separate them from Democrats–rather than to take a stand on the values and principles of hard work, small government and personal responsibility; principles of their own Republican party.

Many Granite State Republicans have embraced the libertarian influence as a life-line that helps them hew to their conservative principles in an increasingly hostile environment. These GOPers are summarily shunned by the moderates as fringe radicals, TEA Partiers or Free Staters. And seeing as we are in New England, maybe small, responsible, affordable, un-intrusive government is a fringe idea. But ask yourself if their alternative (and the Democrats) is better for you, or for them? Who does a bloated, intrusive government serve? You? Or connected politicians?

Free Staters put more faith in you than any New Hampshire Democrat every would. They believe you know better how and where to spend your wages or profits (if you own a business) than greedy political hacks. They know you’d do it more eefieinctly as well. And they know that you are more able to respond in a timely manner, with necessary force, to unlawful attacks on your person or property. Democrats think you should run, or hide, and wait for someone from the government to arrive to confront the attackers, or more likely to fill out a report or draw a chalk outline around your corpse. How is that better than law abiding freedoms?

But that is not the message the RINO’s and leftists want you to hear, which is probably why the sources used in this article are the Democrat who agreed with some libertarians on one issue (Aaron Gill, this Democrat), (r)epublican Tony Soltani – one of those ‘northeast moderate (r)epublicans’ who is also a solid ‘c’ student when voting on issues relevant to his own state party platform, and Victoria Parmele, who sits on a regional planning commission (see Granite State Futures etc), who is an environmentalist, who likes RGGI and taxes that make electricity and heating your home cost you more, loves pricey and pointless commuter rail, and who seems to prefer the benevolent state over small efficient government.

None of these folks would like much of anything in the cneter, for get right of center, so I’m wondering if Kathy Sullivan and Ray Buckley just were not available for comment?

We saw this a lot of the anti-free state noise during the last cycle, and it looks like the left is unwilling to drop the narrative with a less successful mid term on the horizon. Might as well salt the fields from here to 2014, yes?

Well we think you also deserve to hear about the intolerant, self-serving, New Hampshire Democrats, and how they advance an agenda they never run on; or their habit of back-benching and intimidating their own caucus, many of whom they strong armed on gay marriage. Did you know that Aaron Gill? Gay Marriage originally failed in a New Hampshire House with a Democrat Majority. Failed to pass. The Democrat leadership had to beat on their own to advance their agenda to pass it later. They made some no votes not vote or walk away. And they intimidated others to flip. Not the civil Democrat party you were sold on in 2012? They wont be any more civil this time.

So guess what? It’s not the Free Stater’s. It is not Bill O’Brien. It is not the Tea Party. It is just politics. And if you choose to ignore the same tactics being used by Democrats and the establishment Republicans, and pay attention to who wants to spend your money on their agenda, you’ll discover that Free Stater’s don’t want your damn money, but Democrats do. And the Democrats will use the police state to take it, even if they have to spend it first before they come looking for it.
 
It will be interesting to see if you guys can go unscathed if the dems are planning some sort of anti-liberty onslaught coming up here.
 
It will be interesting to see if you guys can go unscathed if the dems are planning some sort of anti-liberty onslaught coming up here.


It would be interesting to see if this tactic backfires on the Liberal Democrats. Hopefully FSP has some media savvy folks that can run an effective pro liberty narrative when they try to push legislation.
 
It will be interesting to see if you guys can go unscathed if the dems are planning some sort of anti-liberty onslaught coming up here.

They aren't planning anything special because of us. The worst thing they could do is create a sales or income tax and the Governor, some of the senate Democrats and even the Democratic Speaker of the NH House don't want to do that. I suspect some gun control crap will pass because of the media going crazy. Maybe 1 of the several recently passed school reform bills will pass. It is widely excepted that they take back the cigarette tax cut (the first in the US) that passed in 2011. 3 of the Dems in the House are FSPers and Ms. Chase will being sitting with a gray haired FSPer when she is in the NH House :)
 
December 27. 2012 2:17PM
What's next for the Free State movement?
By Henry Metz and Dan Moberger
http://www.unionleader.com/article/20121227/newhampshire14/121229313/0/NEWHAMPSHIRE05

Some parts of the article follow.

Editor’s note: This is the last in a series exploring the Free State Project. This week, we look at what the future holds for the Free State movement.

The logo of the Free State Project includes a crudely drawn image of a porcupine, a symbol that became part of the movement’s iconography after an online vote by early project participants.
The porcupine won out over more conventional symbols of liberty, such as the “Don’t Tread on Me” snake, menacing and coiled, depicted in the early American flag designed by Gen. Christopher Gadsden.

According to the Free State Project’s website, the porcupine was chosen by popular vote of its members because something more original and “public relations-friendly” was desired to emphasize the “freshness” of the movement’s approach.

“Porcupines are cute and nonaggressive, but you certainly don’t want to step on them,” explains the official literature of the organization.

There’s little doubt that the Free State Project has established a foothold in New Hampshire. But even one of its more high-profile adherents acknowledges that there’s work to do in order to get the organization instantly recognized by the average Granite Stater.

If the Free State Project is not as high profile as it could be in New Hampshire, that may be by design.

When asked why Free Staters who run for political office in New Hampshire don’t identify themselves as such in their official campaign literature, Warden, the state representative for Goffstown, Weare and Deering, dismissed the need to do so.

“First of all, I challenge that premise,” said Warden. “It sounds like one of the talking points of the Democratic Party. That’s like saying we should have to identify ourselves as being Catholic or Protestant if we decide to run for political office. No one would demand that, so why should it be done in this case?”

Putting labels on Free State participants can be a tricky endeavor, given that not all Free Staters are in agreement about important issues facing the state and the nation.

Free State Project President Carla Gericke, who describes herself as a “recovering lawyer,” moved to New Hampshire with her husband from Manhattan in 2008, during a blizzard.

“We are originally from South Africa – I won a green card in the diversity lottery while I was in law school – and we landed in the San Francisco Bay Area in the mid-nineties,” she said. “We both ended up working in the tech sector and were hit hard when the Internet bubble burst in 2000-01.”
When asked to comment on the charge that Free Staters are simply trying to take over the state’s political apparatus, Gericke said that’s simply incorrect.

“I love this question,” Gericke said. “First, I think we should establish where the criticism is coming from. If it is from folks who benefit from the largesse of government, I would caution others to take it with a pinch of salt. Secondly, 20,000 people cannot ‘take over’ a state with a population of more than a million. Even when the move is triggered (when the 20,000 pledge signers are expected to come), FSP participants will make up less than 1.5 percent of the entire population. Third, did you know that two-thirds of the 2010-12 legislators were not New Hampshire natives? That Maggie Hassan and Jeanne Shaheen aren’t from here originally? Are they trying to ‘take over’? Lastly, the FSP itself is not a political action organization, it’s not tied to any political party, and we do not run candidates for election. What individual participants do once they get here is up to them.”
 
Can we elect Gericke to something?

I don't think she likes politics. She does do politics, but rarely and only when she thinks it is real important. For example, I know she helped Ron Paul and Andy Sanborn with his reelection. I'll share the URL to your post with her, though :) Maybe you can talk her into it :)
 
Last edited:
She doesn't like politics. I think is an anarchist. She does do politics, but rarely and only when she thinks it is real important. For example, I know she helped Ron Paul and Andy Sanborn with his reelection. I'll share the URL to your post with her, though :)

Please do. If she was ever an attorney HERE, she took an oath to defend the Constitution. :p

If she was one in South Africa, still she should understand the importance. And she can think clearly.
 
Back
Top