Primary Results June 5th - CA, MT, SD, NJ, NM (Delegate Allocation Rules in 1st Post)

[MarcusI]

McKnight was not on the ballot in District 7, i voted there

I think they got something wrong. Also McGowan is not in Dist. 50, but in Dist. 4

------------

Paul numbers in NJ are steadily raising on a low overall level, now 10,1% with 12.2% reporting

 

[MarcusI]

First results from South Dakota at CNN:

9%
reporting

Romney

3,060

64%

Paul

648

14%


Santorum

580

12%


Gingrich

211

4%

 

[sailingaway]

First results from South Dakota at CNN:

9%
reporting

Romney

3,060

64%

Paul

648

14%


Santorum

580

12%


Gingrich

211

4%

I hope that goes up, we need 20% for delegates, as I understand it.

 

[Keith and stuff]

First numbers for NM according to Google
http://www.google.com/elections/ed/us/results/2012/gop-primary/nm

New Mexico Primary
0.1% reporting (1/1541)

Romney
71.4%
15

Santorum
9.5%
2

Paul
9.5%
2

Gingrich
9.5%
2

 

[MarcusI]

More results from NEW MEXICO (CNN):

11%
reporting

Romney
79%

Paul
9%

Santorum
8%

Gingrich
4%

 

[sailingaway]

First numbers for NM according to Google
http://www.google.com/elections/ed/us/results/2012/gop-primary/nm

New Mexico Primary
0.1% reporting (1/1541)

Romney
71.4%
15

Santorum
9.5%
2

Paul
9.5%
2

Gingrich
9.5%
2

In which alphabet does Santorum come before Paul? Or Gingrich?

I'd hoped for better

 

[Gray Fullbuster]

Santa being Paul in SD.

Oh lord.

 

[MarcusI]

I hope that goes up, we need 20% for delegates, as I understand it.

At least for "bound" delegates. I think they don't elect the delegates at the primary as in NJ.

 

[Keith and stuff]

I hope that goes up, we need 20% for delegates, as I understand it.

I wouldn't count on RP getting 20% in a place like SD. If it was a caucus, absolutely. However, it isn't a caucus, it is a closed primary.

Ron Paul is currently in 3rd in a 2 man race in SD. I fully expect Ron Paul to finish 2nd, though. There were other candidates no longer in the race in 2008 and Ron Paul ended up soundly defeating the candidates that were not in the race. Hopefully, that happens again.

 

[oldpal]

Is western SD any better for us? Stuck at 12.6%

 

[MarcusI]

Santa being Paul in SD.

Oh lord.

Will be hard battle, I suppose, between Santa and Paul in SD. Both around 13%, Paul leading 1,780 to 1,737.

At least this will probably be the worst state for Romney since media declared the race over. 65% overall, 5,5% voting "uncommitted" in a four-man-race, some counties under 50% Romney.

 

[Paulite]

sd a state ron paul lead in the polls. diebold

 

[MarcusI]

Also in NEW MEXICO a tight race between Paul and Santorum for 2nd Place.

15% reporting (CNN)
1,517 Paul
1,458 Santorum

 

[SilenceDewgooder]

and how many absentee ballots have been accounted for?

 

[MarcusI]

Wanna hear some good news after this SNAFU?

According to Daily Paul:

[] Vote for Stacey Nelson State rep Dist 19 SOUTH DAKOTA

20/26 precints reporting

Nelson 37%
Schoenfish 28%
Putnam 23%
Hofer 11%

 

[CPUd]

I thought they weren't using the machines in SD?

 

[kathy88]

McKnight was not on the ballot in District 7, i voted there

Kyrillos is my ediatricians son. (I'm in my 40s) kinda weird. Don't live in NJ anymore.

 

[SilenceDewgooder]

I wonder how the nation would react if Paul won the popular vote in Utah.

 

[MarcusI]

Daily Paul:

[] Vote for Ernie Otton (state Senate) (dist 6) SOUTH DAKOTA

Precints 10/12

Otton 56%
Abdallah 44% (okay, with this name...)

[] Vote for Jason Long, and Isaac Latterell (house) (dist 6) South Dakota

(I dont know why they say you should vote for both, but: )

Latterell 37%
Nusz 23%
Otten 22%
Long 18%

 

[Aratus]

Walker just won in Wisconsin