Primary Results June 5th - CA, MT, SD, NJ, NM (Delegate Allocation Rules in 1st Post)

MarcusI

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
909
Just wanted to start a thread for all incoming results... or would it be better to have one for each primary? I doubt it, so I started it right now.

Polls closing time in Eastern Time according to The Green Papers:

New Jersey 8 pm

New Mexico 9 pm

South Dakota 9 pm [NOTE: South Dakota is split between the Central Time Zone and Mountain Time Zone; the poll closing time of 9 pm ET is the time at which all polls throughout the State are closed]

Montana 10 pm

California 11 pm



Some notes on delegate allocation (according to Green Papers with annotations by me):

New Jersey:

All of New Jersey's 50 delegates to the Republican National Convention are bound to a presidential contender in today's New Jersey Presidential Primary.

- 50 delegates are bound to the presidential contender receiving the greatest number of votes in the primary statewide.

- The delegate candidates appear on the ballot as a slate on the same ballot line, column or row as that of their respective presidential candidate. It is possible, however, for a voter to choose a delegate slate supporting a presidential contender other than the one for whom he/she might vote for in the Presidential Preference portion of the ballot.

- The 3 party leaders, the National Committeeman, the National Committeewoman, and the chairman of the New Jersey's Republican Party, will by virtue of their position, attend the convention pledged to the winner of the primary.

[I think all early results will refer to meaningless presidential preference. But I doubt that there will be a great difference. So in the end there is no chance to turn around the popular vote. NJ's 50 will surely go to Romney, I expect]

New Mexico:

- 20 of 23 of New Mexico's delegates to the Republican National Convention are bound to presidential contenders based on the results of the voting in today's New Mexico Presidential Primary. [Other 3 are RNC delegates)

- 20 National Convention delegates are to be bound proportionally to presidential contenders who receive 15% or more of the primary vote statewide.

[So there could be Paul delegates "bound" to Romney after the NM GOP convention]

South Dakota:

-25 of South Dakota's 28 delegates to the Republican National Convention are allocated to presidential contenders based on the results of the voting in today's South Dakota Presidential Primary. There is a 20% threshold.

- In addition, 3 RNC will attend the convention as unbound delegates. The SD Republican Party informed the Green Papers that the automatic delegates have decided to vote for the winner of the primary.

[I think that the actual delegates will be chosen at the state convention, so there could be Paul supporters "bound" to Romney. Correct me if I'm wrong]

Montana:

- Montana has a 100% non-binding Presidential Primary. The primary has no effect on delegate allocation.

- The participants of the GOP state convention alone determine if presidential preference is to be a factor and, if so, how it is to be applied.

California:


- 169 of 172 of California's delegates to the Republican National Convention are pledged to presidential contenders in today's California Presidential Primary.

- 159 district delegates are to be bound to presidential contenders based on the primary results in each of the 53 congressional districts: each congressional district is assigned 3 National Convention delegates and the presidential contender receiving the greatest number of votes in that district will receive all 3 of that district's National Convention delegates.

- 10 at-large delegates (10 base at-large delegates plus 0 bonus delegate) are to be bound to the presidential contender receiving the greatest number of votes in the primary statewide.

- The selection of Presidential Nominating Convention Delegates to the Republican National Convention ... shall be chosen by the Presidential candidate who obtained the plurality of Republican votes within each Congressional district, and, for ... at large ... by the Presidential candidate who obtained the plurality of Republican votes statewide. [Standing Rules and Bylaws of the California Republican Party As Amended 20 March 2011 Article VI Section 6.01 (A)]

[So there is no real chance for Paul delegates "bound" to Romney, correct me if I'm wrong.]
 
Last edited:
They have been closed for 11 minutes and have not declared a winner yet? This is just odd:cool:
 
As usual, CNN has the first results

Romney 74%
Paul 14%
Santorum 5%
Gingrich 4%

Under 1% reporting
 
CA is right. If we win my district in CA, I will be preparing for Tampa.
 
Yep, correct. I will always write the state together with the results from now on, but until 9 pm ET there are only NJ results
 
do they use robots or are they ACTUALY CAPABLE OF COUNTING VOTES?
 
46th CD in CA

Paul +1 (me)

I hope we take a good chunk of the CD's here in California, i been seeing loads of Paul stickers and signs everywhere for the last few months.
 
46th CD in CA

Paul +1 (me)

I hope we take a good chunk of the CD's here in California, i been seeing loads of Paul stickers and signs everywhere for the last few months.

In L.A. I've seen only Paul and Obama stickers, literally NONE for anyone else (but yard signs for the redistricted congressional districts.) Unfortunately, L.A. is the media and lives by it. My only hope is that there aren't many Republicans here AT ALL.
 
According to Daily Paul these are Liberty candidates in NJ:

[] Vote for Robert Witterschein U.S. House Rep. Dist. 3

[] Vote for Patrick McKnight U.S. House Rep. Dist. 7

[] Vote for Joe Rudy Rullo U.S. Senate (statewide I believe)

[] Vote for Terry McGowan House Rep. Dist. 50

I cant find results for Witterschein and McKnight, but the other races:

Kyrillos , Joe GOP 5,493 65%
Brown , David GOP 1,175 14%
Rullo , Rudy GOP 937 11%
Qarmout , Bader GOP 834 10%

Smith , Chris (i) GOP 815 82%
McGowan , Terrence GOP 173 18%

Under 2% reporting in both races
 
In L.A. I've seen only Paul and Obama stickers, literally NONE for anyone else (but yard signs for the redistricted congressional districts.) Unfortunately, L.A. is the media and lives by it. My only hope is that there aren't many Republicans here AT ALL.

Well, i know there are a lot of Mormons that pushed to get the gay marriage proposition defeated last election here in CA, lets hope the stay home for the primary.
 
According to Daily Paul these are Liberty candidates in NJ:

[] Vote for Robert Witterschein U.S. House Rep. Dist. 3

[] Vote for Patrick McKnight U.S. House Rep. Dist. 7

[] Vote for Joe Rudy Rullo U.S. Senate (statewide I believe)

[] Vote for Terry McGowan House Rep. Dist. 50

I cant find results for Witterschein and McKnight, but the other races:

Kyrillos , Joe GOP 5,493 65%
Brown , David GOP 1,175 14%
Rullo , Rudy GOP 937 11%
Qarmout , Bader GOP 834 10%

Smith , Chris (i) GOP 815 82%
McGowan , Terrence GOP 173 18%

Under 2% reporting in both races

McKnight was not on the ballot in District 7, i voted there
 
Results are coming in faster now in NJ, CNN already declared Romney the winner... with 6% reporting.

Romney

82.5%

17,121


Paul

9.7%

2,014


Santorum

4.8%

1,005


Gingrich

3.0%

618
 
Back
Top