Prediction: Ron Paul will not run in 2012

[nbhadja]

Reagan was 76 in office. You've got no idea what you're talking about.

Reagen was 69 when he was elected into his 2nd term and 73 years old when he was finished.

Ron Paul is will be 77 years old in 2012 and in 2020 he will be 85 after 2 terms of presidency.

So:

Reagen= 65 -73 years old during presidency
Paul= 77 years old- 85 years old during presidency

Big difference- 12 years.





He looks 60ish. You exercise more than you do, lol.

Nothing will be able to convince the sheep otherwise, 77 years old is 77 years old to them.


Full of crap. They've used up their BS. Health issues? Sorry champ, that's McCain. Maybe you should stop projecting. Ron Paul is healthy as far as I see.

The media is composed of 100% crap. They will never run out of bullshit because they are bullshit. Go ask the sheeple what they think of a 77-85 year old president. It does not matter if RP is 100% healthy, the public still will fear his age.



How I Won in the Election by John Sophocleus

.........

 

[trey4sports]

Mike Gravel was 78 when he ran last year...nobody made a big deal out of his age.

Gravel was 78?!
i thought early 60's.... he didnt look 78

 

[Truth Warrior]

I have better hopes for Ron than that. He's earned it My SWAG is no POTUS run in 2012 for Ron.

 

[Feelgood]

Pretty accurate prediction, since Ron Paul has already stated he has no intentions of running.

 

[Conza88]

.........

Your empirical analysis is retarded. Your premises are flawed. There is a difference between winning and running (spreading the message)

You would be good to learn the difference.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_United_States_Senators_by_age

"As of January 24, 2009, 1 Senator is in his 90s, 3 are in their 80s, 19 are in their 70s, 36 are in their 60s."

Hence, you are full of it. You completely and dismally missed my point entirely.

Check your premises. I suggest you actually listen to the audio at the end of the post and then you might get a clue.

Mike Gravel was 78 when he ran last year...nobody made a big deal out of his age.

Gravel was 78?!
i thought early 60's.... he didnt look 78

.........

 

[JoshLowry]

I hope Sanford runs and wins!!!! I will even donate to his campaign and put up yard signs. I may even volunteer.

Ahh! My heart! *head asplodes*

 

[nbhadja]

Your empirical analysis is retarded. Your premises are flawed. There is a difference between winning and running (spreading the message)

You would be good to learn the difference.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_United_States_Senators_by_age



Hence, you are full of it. You completely and dismally missed my point entirely.

Check your premises. I suggest you actually listen to the audio at the end of the post and then you might get a clue.

.........

You were wrong on the Reagen thing, you told me I was clueless about it yet it was YOU who was 12 years off.

Spreading the message is done by votes primarily. If you only get a small percent of the votes you are not gonna get much coverage and majority of the country (outside of Ron Paul/freedom lovers) will not vote for a 77 year old. It is hard to deny that.

Plus Ron Paul will still campaign for whoever he endorses if he decides to do that.

And senators are a different story. It is not like running for the Republican nomination/president.

The first black senator we had was in 1870. Today we finally got a half black man as president for the 1st time.

We have had women senators since 1932.

Its a different thing in running for the senate.






___

 

[Conza88]

You were wrong on the Reagen thing, you told me I was clueless about it yet it was YOU who was 12 years off.

Your premise is flawed, and thus so is your conclusion. Your numbers mean nothing. Better luck next time.

Spreading the message is done by votes primarily.

No it's not.

If you only get a small percent of the votes you are not gonna get much coverage and majority of the country (outside of Ron Paul/freedom lovers) will not vote for a 77 year old. It is hard to deny that.

No it's not. You've pulled that conclusion completely out of your ass.

Your only basis is AGE.

YOU go pwned on the age factor, the American people have voted for a fcken 90 year old, 80 year olds and 70 year olds. Your point, again - fails remarkably.

Plus Ron Paul will still campaign for whoever he endorses if he decides to do that.

And senators are a different story. It is not like running for the Republican nomination/president.

Different position, practically exact same process. The differentials are miniscule and to some how contrast them as completely different is idiotic and fallicious. You've merely said so - yet presented no argument.

Go figure.

The first black senator we had was in 1870. Today we finally got a half black man as president for the 1st time.

We have had women senators since 1932.

What has this got to do with anything?

Its a different thing in running for the senate.

Still based on the American people voting on AGE. Which is what your whole BS conclusion is based on.

Fail.

___

___

 

[BlackTerrel]

Running will be good. With all this time to plan now and the Internet taking over even more of the MSM he will get even much more attention in 2012. I don't see the downside...

 

[Conza88]

Running will be good. With all this time to plan now and the Internet taking over even more of the MSM he will get even much more attention in 2012. I don't see the downside...

He may be running for the President of the North American Union? lol... jks

 

[eok321]

I tink we all know by now that ron does'nt play games so when he says running is not part of his intentions at this point i think we have to believe him.

My guess is that he has someone lined up to run with the support of the CFL.

Personally i would prefer Johnson as his track record looks fairly bullet proof and he's a good speaker.

The problem is going to be getting all the Paul supporters to row in behind 1 candidate which will no doubt be impossible.

 

[trey4sports]

RP needs to run in 2012, he will be a firs tier candidate and the Revolution will be in full swing.

 

[speciallyblend]

RP needs to run in 2012, he will be a firs tier candidate and the Revolution will be in full swing.

exactly

 

[PowerOfLiberty]

He ran.

 

[The Northbreather]

Oh yes he did!

 

[RonPaulFanInGA]

Ron Paul didn't run in 2012, for his House seat.

Amazing predictive powers!