wecandoit
Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2007
- Messages
- 256
There won't be official word until very late Monday or early Tuesday, when it'll be too late to organize a barage of phone calls or email protests.
They have learned their lesson.
Does anyone think the idea of banning Ron Paul from future debates ended with the 10K plus signature petetion to the MI GOP? Do you think the head of the MI GOP was the only one who felt this way? or that their desire to ban RP was reversed due to the petition, or was it increased?
They feel they can't afford a repeat of the South Carlina debate where the talking heads scoffed and dismissed RP only to see him with 36% of the text voting shortly after. What followed was probably the biggest surge of campaign contributions any candidate has seen yet.
Fox news was hopping mad, the MSM was hopping mad, as was the GOP.
By excluding Ron Paul at the last second, they would avoid a similar embarassment, and wouldn't have to worry about any more debate appearances from RP for a long time, if ever.
Understand, I want to be very wrong about this prediction.
I make this prediction to soften the blow of the deflation of our efforts they want to acheive and to reinterate what I've been saying. In order to get Ron Paul elected here is what we must do.
* Forget the polls, the media, and most likely the debates.
* Don't allow them to deflate our efforts or expectations.
* We have to be the press, inform everyone we can about RP, and what is happening.
* Make sure that those who want Ron Paul, will VOTE for Ron Paul, in the early primaries
*And then the biggest hurdle of all, do everything we can to prevent and expose voter fraud, to make sure votes for Ron Paul are tallied.
Folks, it's going to be a knock down, drag out, bloody fist fight for 7 more months.
Paul HAS to win or do very well in NH,Iowa, etc.
When he does, the man behind the curtain, the great and powerful OZ( the media) will be exposed, and it will be downhill from there.
They have learned their lesson.
Does anyone think the idea of banning Ron Paul from future debates ended with the 10K plus signature petetion to the MI GOP? Do you think the head of the MI GOP was the only one who felt this way? or that their desire to ban RP was reversed due to the petition, or was it increased?
They feel they can't afford a repeat of the South Carlina debate where the talking heads scoffed and dismissed RP only to see him with 36% of the text voting shortly after. What followed was probably the biggest surge of campaign contributions any candidate has seen yet.
Fox news was hopping mad, the MSM was hopping mad, as was the GOP.
By excluding Ron Paul at the last second, they would avoid a similar embarassment, and wouldn't have to worry about any more debate appearances from RP for a long time, if ever.
Understand, I want to be very wrong about this prediction.
I make this prediction to soften the blow of the deflation of our efforts they want to acheive and to reinterate what I've been saying. In order to get Ron Paul elected here is what we must do.
* Forget the polls, the media, and most likely the debates.
* Don't allow them to deflate our efforts or expectations.
* We have to be the press, inform everyone we can about RP, and what is happening.
* Make sure that those who want Ron Paul, will VOTE for Ron Paul, in the early primaries
*And then the biggest hurdle of all, do everything we can to prevent and expose voter fraud, to make sure votes for Ron Paul are tallied.
Folks, it's going to be a knock down, drag out, bloody fist fight for 7 more months.
Paul HAS to win or do very well in NH,Iowa, etc.
When he does, the man behind the curtain, the great and powerful OZ( the media) will be exposed, and it will be downhill from there.
Last edited:


