PPP teases with NH tweets

[jclay2]

Guys we are still favored by 50% over huntsman to get second in New Hampshire. Don't start worrying yet.

 

[Number19]

What does born mean? How would you define life if not at conception? How do you protect life at all if not immediately after conception?

Birth has always been defined through the millenia as that moment when the baby exits the womb and takes its first breath of life. I'm not discussing the meaning of "life". I'm discussing the Constitution and the Law. This has direct implications for my own campaign and upcoming debates.

 

[jclay2]

Chris Matthews blatantly said he wanted to push Ron Paul out of the discussion and see Huntsman take second. They are also citing false polls. It's pretty obvious what they're doing.

Probably getting another tickle in his legs over huntsman.

 

[PaulConventionWV]

Birth has always been defined through the millenia as that moment when the baby exits the womb and takes its first breath of life. I'm not discussing the meaning of "life". I'm discussing the Constitution and the Law. This has direct implications for my own campaign and upcoming debates.

I edited my post to include that saying that all persons "born" are protected under the 14th doesn't negate or deny rights to those not born yet. You can define life as beginning at conception, and the 14th would apply just as much as it did before.

 

[Liberty74]

theres still time these polls were taken before the i went comment i have faith this could really help Ron Paul in the long run and in this primary. alot of people saw that and alot of people are gonna talk about it

You are assuming too much. Herding sheep and getting voters doesn't work with a one liner in a debate. A lot of them were getting one liners in and making decent points. Are they all going to surge now. See your thinking here?

We are up against a power force people. Bottom line, Ron Paul needs to get aggressive and aggressive like right now. You don't let CNN release a fake poll and you don't allow the Huntsman ad take you down either. You get out in front of the BS and lies while taking the story down before it gets legs to take you down.

 

[happyphilter]

Two days is more than enough for Huntsman to surge into second. Have we learned nothing from Iowa?

 

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

The only surge there will be if there is one is diebold. Huntsman got freakin' 1% in Iowa, Paul got 22x his votes!

 

[otherone]

I don't think placement affects things at all. Paul continues even at 3rd, the media destroys Huntsman, and the next 'surge' candidate is put forward. As long as Romney's coronation is delayed, Paul has a chance. What I'm most concerned about is percentage support. I don't think Paul's support is 'fair weather', and a 20%+ showing means the movement is solid.

 

[Ronulus]

Two days is more than enough for Huntsman to surge into second. Have we learned nothing from Iowa?

Apparently not. Yet at the same time how can we stop this when people view the pundits so highly. For some reason people believe these anchors know their stuff and would only support someone that was going to win or was the best candidate. So they vote for who they are told.

 

[Korey Kaczynski]

I see, you're an '11-er.

As an 07 I chuckled.

 

[Sublyminal]

I don't placement affects things at all. Paul continues even at 3rd, the media destroys Huntsman, and the next 'surge' candidate is put forward. As long as Romney's coronation is delayed, Paul has a chance. What I'm most concerned about is percentage support. I don't think Paul's support is 'fair weather', and a 20%+ showing means the movement is solid.

We can win this thing, we just need NH to be smart enough not to fall for the MSM fake surge.

 

[Carehn]

As an 07 I chuckled.

I wish I could say I was an 07er.

 

[abstrusezincate]

The good news is nobody watches MSNBC.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

Huntsman is gone after this week, good riddance.

Santorum is gone after SC, or FL. He's out of gas.

Gingrich is gone after FL or certainly after super Tuesday.

Perry's heart is not in it and could quit anytime after SC, but Bilderberg control probably ordered him to stay put. He has the money, and may have been promised a "comeback kid" surge or a VP slot. His job will be to serve as a firewall for Mitt, to split the anti-Romney vote that might go to Paul.

Only 8% of the delegates will be decided by early February. Only 28% will be distributed even after super Tuesday. Hang in there, folks, this is a marathon war of attrition to get the 72% of delegates still unbound after early March, and the 72% of GOP voters who don't really want Mitt.

 

[PaulConventionWV]

The good news is nobody watches MSNBC.

Why is that good news? Dr. Paul did great!

 

[Sublyminal]

I wish I could say I was an 07er.

If I wasn't in Iraq at that time, I could say I was an 07'er...

 

[Sublyminal]

Huntsman is gone after this week, good riddance.

Santorum is gone after SC, or FL. He's out of gas.

Gingrich is gone after FL or certainly after super Tuesday.

Perry's heart is not in it and could quit anytime after SC, but Bilderberg control probably ordered him to stay put. He has the money, and may have been promised a "comeback kid" surge or a VP slot. His job will be to serve as a firewall for Mitt, to split the anti-Romney vote that might go to Paul.

Only 8% of the delegates will be decided by early February. Only 28% will be distributed even after super Tuesday. Hang in there, folks, this is a marathon war or attrition to get the 72% of delegates still unbound after early March, and the 72% or GOP voters who don't really want Mitt.

LOL I forgot Perry was still in it.

 

[Number19]

My intent was not to hijack the thread, but to ask LibertyEagle to expand on his understanding of Ron Paul's position of supporting the questioned legislation. I would expand my question to include the Senior Moderator, sailingaway - both of whom's opinion I've respected over the past years.

 

[Liberty74]

Apparently not. Yet at the same time how can we stop this when people view the pundits so highly. For some reason people believe these anchors know their stuff and would only support someone that was going to win or was the best candidate. So they vote for who they are told.

You put out a press release to counter the BS. It's real simple. The Clinton team back in 1992 was very effective at doing it, controlling the story and making sure it didn't receive any legs. You can't control everything but you TRY.

 

[otherone]

It's not pundit's opinions that sway voters....it's when pundits spout pseudo-facts in their opinions....like claiming Huntsman is surging, when in fact, the tail is wagging the dog AGAIN.