PPP is Slowly Leaking Their Post-Debate Polls - Ron Paul did not lose any ground in Iowa

In the poll earlier this week by Rasmussen it showed Mittens ahead in Iowa...so it isn't inconceivable that he will be leading in this one.
 
If Ron comes first in their poll i'm going to sue them for mental distress for that mittisnextinline. Jk
 
I'm hoping that Ron is first in Iowa, but I'm not trying to get my hopes up. I hate getting disappointed, I like pleasant surprises. Right now I'm going to assume Mitt 23 Ron 22 Gingrich 20 in Iowa. Mitt 33 Ron 22 Huntsman 11 Gingrich 8 in New Hampshire. Mitt 32 Gingrich 20 Ron 13 Nationally.
 
mitt is next in line, to newt being 3rd, means mitts 2nd. Or it means their next tweet will be about mitt.
 
The only people giving Ron grief are the typical sources: Levin/Hannity/Limbaugh..basically, neocon central.

Don't forget to email your local radio stations and ask to take these shills off the air.

+1!

guys, even if we take a small dip after the debate (and im NOT saying we will) its important to not get too high or too low. We've come a long way and we are winning this thing! Stay the course and keep a level head.

I agree. I could easily be wrong, but I think the last debate will cause a brief dip, followed by a surge over the course of weeks. When Ron is provocative, it can hurt him, but in the mid-term and long-term it educates.

And a dip may not even be noticeable. "Faux News" is a cliche anymore, Bachmann was clearly shown to be misinformed while Ron was up on the latest intelligence, and the Leno appearance went very well.
 
Given the facebook data that's been posted, I think there not be a (real) dip - certainly not one big enough to be detectable by a poll with the kind of margin of error this one will have.
 
Given the facebook data that's been posted, I think there not be a (real) dip - certainly not one big enough to be detectable by a poll with the kind of margin of error this one will have.

I think you're right. :)
 
The campaign needs to back off the Newt ads, or will be spending money to push up Romneyl a guy who got 30,000 votes in 2008. Why aren;t we hitting Romney yet?
 
The way I am reading it, since they tweeted:

Iowa looking like something close to a 3 way tie between Paul, Mitt, Newt. Perry and Bachmann still clearly in a lower tier

Means Ron is in FIRST by a few points ahead of Romney in second and Newt in third.
 
The campaign needs to back off the Newt ads, or will be spending money to push up Romneyl a guy who got 30,000 votes in 2008. Why aren;t we hitting Romney yet?

What are you going to say about Romney that people don't already know?

I suggest that it is 3 weeks to the caucus and half that time is holiday cheer. It is time to go non-stop positive, excepting perhaps a swiftboating type ad on the day before or of the caucus. Its time to bring out the ads with babies, carol, rand and the smiling doc himself, Ron.
 
The campaign needs to back off the Newt ads, or will be spending money to push up Romneyl a guy who got 30,000 votes in 2008. Why aren;t we hitting Romney yet?

I think because Newt's decline happened fast, a lot faster than I expected. He is still not lower-tier, but the trend is clear. Newt is the slimiest individual in the race.
 
The way I am reading it, since they tweeted:



Means Ron is in FIRST by a few points ahead of Romney in second and Newt in third.


yes, but i think that was tweeted yesterday, which was after the first day in a 3 day polling series so that very well could change.
 
Back
Top