Piers Morgan is a scumbag

Statistics can be made to say anything you want, if you do it right. If only those people buried right now had, had a way to protect themselves they may be alive today.
yeah man ... like in those smart clint eastwood movies, right?
that's how reality works.

1342131750_ronald_reagan_riding_a_velociraptor_by_sharpwriter-d55rsh7.jpg
 
Last edited:
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson

But of course vienna would rather see the American people dis-armed, and semi-auto guns confiscated. and to hell with all the soldiers who fought and died to craft and maintain the Constitution.

What chaps my ass is Piers Morgan giving his hollow disclaimer that he 'respects' the 2nd amendment. I suggest this throw back to King George's army is a lying POS but he is getting the attention he wants and needs....lol...

I'm pretty sure he hasn't got the balls to go one on one with Ted Nugent for an hour on primetime CNN.
 
your problem is the tyranny of your neighbours who are commiting mass murder in alarmingly short intervalls. not the tyranny of your government.
and if ted nugent is your intellectual role model then i know who i'm talking too.
 
your problem is the tyranny of your neighbours who are commiting mass murder in alarmingly short intervalls. not the tyranny of your government.
and if ted nugent is your intellectual role model then i know who i'm talking too.

Ted would have Piers biting the edge of the table with his eyeballs circling inside his head. Piers is a mental midget. You know it, i know it, and most any lucid thinking adult knows it.

I don't agree with Ted on many things, but he speaks for me on the gun issue.
 
Last edited:
I hate how people like Piers use the inflated numbers to bolster their argument. People love to make it sound like American's are nothing but gun toting killers. It sure does make your numbers sound higher when you add in the suicides and gang related killings.
 
yeah man, he is a real american. with guns and guts and stuff.
not one of those gay european communists.
 
yeah man, he is a real american. with guns and guts and stuff.
not one of those gay european communists.

hahaha...geez...biting the rug already?...we just got started.

Lets have that 'conversation' i keep hearing about WE need to have, and this starts with the Jews in Nazi Germany. Take the guns, get on the train. You approve of this apparently.
 
well ... reading this forum ... those stereotypes about the us aren't all wrong i guess.
 
Is there some reason why so many of you watch TV?

The herd watches TV. It is the weather forecast for where the country is heading.

It gives you the ability to understand your neighbors, friends, family and co-workers since that is where they likely got their government talking points from.
 
Last edited:
they have to consider that already. but if they are armed too and surprise you and start to shoot as soon as they enter the room then they won ...
but still .... in reality ... not in your fantasy land ... in reality ... the statistics make a clear argument.
america is doing terribly compared to the other western countries.
over here there are less guns and less killings with guns. that's the reality. if you prefer to live in fantasy land than this is your decision.

Yeah, better to let them finish killing the room and then themselves long before the cops show up to bag their body than them only killing a fraction of the room before taking a bullet from someone who is allowed to carry and is in the room or nearby.

Your fantasy is better because if america added the strict no gun laws of Europe all the criminals will turn in their guns and america will be gunless in no time. THREAT AVERTED. Exactly because of what you mention, (there are less guns over there) you can't even compare Europe to the US because there are so many existing firearms in the country that any law to restrict law abiding citizens from possessing weapons won't hinder the supply out there for the criminals by any substantial amount.

Where is the example of a country that had guns aplenty (about a gun for ever person in the population) that went to strict gun control? Those are the only stats that could help your argument...if they were favourable.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, better to let them finish killing the room and then themselves long before the cops show up to bag their body than them only killing a fraction of the room before taking a bullet from someone who is allowed to carry and is in the room or nearby.

Your fantasy is better because if america added the strict no gun laws of Europe all the criminals will turn in their guns and america will be gunless in no time. THREAT AVERTED. You can't even compare Europe to the US because there are so many existing firearms in the country that any law to restrict law abiding citizens from possessing weapons won't hinder the supply out there for the criminals by any substantial amount.

Where is the example of a country that had guns aplenty (about a gun for ever person in the population) that went to strict gun control? Those are the only stats that could help your argument...if they were favourable.
there were wars and civil wars in nearly all european countries within the last 100 or 200 years.
jugslavia was the last one.
but there is also politics and regulation.
 
no. i will leave it to you missusing the holocaust and all it's dead and tortured for this discussion.

got it. You approve of people not being able to defend themselves from a tyrannical government. You are truly a lost soul.
 
got it. You approve of people not being able to defend themselves from a tyrannical government. You are truly a lost soul.
you disgusting person will go on with this absurd claim that the jews could have prevented the holocaust if they would have had enough guns?
do you have no decency in your body?
do you ever think before making such absurd statements?
england, france, poland and the rest of europe combined couldn't stop the nazis. but a bunch of armed jews in german cities would have stopped the ss from coming after them.
i can see sigmund freud and arnold schönberg fighting the sa with their rifles. just like you rednecks would have done it, ey?
 
Last edited:
you disgusting person will go on with this absurd claim that the jews could have prevented the holocaust if they would have had enough guns?
do you have no decency in your body?

oh?...not true?....are you telling me it was a good idea for the Jews not to have guns?...i wonder how many NAZI's would have been killed, or perhaps just perhaps the holocaust would never taken place...you going to tell me otherwise?...geez...your mindset is breath taking.
 
Back
Top