Pharmacies Push Untested Flu Shot on Pregnant Women

donnay

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
42,534
Pharmacies Push Untested Flu Shot on Pregnant Women

Infowars.com
January 23, 2014

Flu season is underway, and vaccines are being pushed as the only safe choice for avoiding a sometimes deadly bout with the flu, especially for pregnant women. But what you aren’t being told may come as a shock. The safety of the flu vaccine has never been tested on pregnant women or their developing fetus. We went undercover to two of the nation’s largest walk-in flu shot pharmacies to see if they think these mercury-laden vaccines are “safe and effective”.

 
4,250% Increase in Fetal Deaths Reported to VAERS After Flu Shot Given to Pregnant Women

By Christina England
vactruth.com

Documentation received from the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) states that between 2009 and 2010 the mercury-laden combined flu vaccinations have increased Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting Systems (VAERS) fetal death reports by 4,250 percent in pregnant women. Eileen Dannemann, NCOW’s director, made abundantly clear that despite these figures being known to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the multiple-strain, inactivated flu vaccine containing mercury (Thimerosal) has once again been recommended to pregnant women as a safe vaccination this season.

Outraged by the CDC’s total disregard for human life, Ms. Dannemann accused the CDC of ‘willful misconduct,’ saying that they are responsible for causing the deaths of thousands of unborn babies. She stated that the CDC deliberately misled the nation’s obstetricians and gynecologists and colluded with the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) to mislead the public by advertising the flu vaccine as a safe vaccine for pregnant women when they knew fully well that it was causing a massive spike in fetal deaths.

In a letter to Dr. Joseph Mercola, Ms. Dannemann wrote:


“Not only did the CDC fail to disclose the spiraling spike in fetal death reports in real time during the 2009 pandemic season as to cut the fetal losses, but also we have documented by transcript Dr. Marie McCormick, chairperson of the Vaccine Safety Risk Assessment Working Group (VSRAWG) on September 3, 2010, denying any adverse events in the pregnant population during the 2009 Pandemic season.” [1]

HIDING LIFE-OR-DEATH EVIDENCE

Because the H1N1 pandemic vaccine had never been tested on the pregnant population, and to lessen the intensity of fears of the unknown risks, Dr. Marie McCormick of the CDC was employed to keep track of all adverse events during the 2009 pandemic season, including those adverse events in the pregnant population. Dr. McCormick was responsible for sending monthly reports to the Secretary of the Health and Human Services (HHS), citing any suspicious adverse events.

According to Ms. Dannemann, NCOW has been unable to obtain access to these monthly reports. After sending a Freedom of Information Act request to the CDC, she was told that she may have to wait 36 months to access what should be published public reports.


Continued...
 
]Nice to see Dr Mengele here advocating for using pregnant women as lab rats, isn't it?


My bad. I meant Mercola. (Same thing though.)
 
]Nice to see Dr Mengele here advocating for using pregnant women as lab rats, isn't it?


My bad. I meant Mercola. (Same thing though.)

Dr. Mengele was considered the Angel of Death. Dr. Mercola is the hero trying to rescue people from death--big difference. But I wouldn't expect you to make that connection because of your Stockholm Syndrome.
 
You're the one advocating it, so you should ask yourself.

You are here insisting that there should be trials that intentionally expose pregnant women, both vaccinated and not, to the flu. That's either sick or absolutely crazy to anybody with half a brain.


After a little Googling, I know why they don't do that, and I know how they determine the safety in lieu of those ghoulish experiments you're advocating for. I also know that's why it took a lot longer for the advice to use it on pregnant women to develop.

Your sources are implying that no studies have been done, which isn't true. And the study they're insisting should be done won't ever be done because it's a horrific concept. No ethical researcher in the world would do what they're suggesting.

Here's a study: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/16/h...nefits-of-flu-vaccine-for-pregnant-women.html
 
Last edited:
You are here insisting that there should be trials that intentionally expose pregnant women, both vaccinated and not, to the flu. That's either sick or absolutely crazy to anybody with half a brain.


After a little Googling, I know why they don't do that, and I know how they determine the safety in lieu of those ghoulish experiments you're advocating for. I also know that's why it took a lot longer for the advice to use it on pregnant women to develop.

Your sources are implying that no studies have been done, which isn't true. And the study they're insisting should be done won't ever be done because it's a horrific concept. No ethical researcher in the world would do what they're suggesting.

Here's a study: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/16/h...nefits-of-flu-vaccine-for-pregnant-women.html

I am insisting people use their critical thinking cap. Mercury s still in Flu vaccines and mercury is dangerous in any amount--period.
 
The dose makes the poison - period.

It's not only that. The single dose flu shot doesn't even contain therimisol.


DonnaY just has to have at least one horribly frightening headline every day. She does not care one iota if it is actually true.
 
It's not only that. The single dose flu shot doesn't even contain therimisol.


DonnaY just has to have at least one horribly frightening headline every day. She does not care one iota if it is actually true.


I wasn't talking about the FluMist--but the FluMist has a live virus in it and not recommended for pregnant women.
 
I wasn't talking about the FluMist--but the FluMist has a live virus in it and not recommended for pregnant women.

Sigh. I wasn't talking about FluMist either. In fact, I specifically said "shot."

The single dose SHOT does not contain thermisol.
 
Mercury is a poison and there is no denying that fact, but dumbasses continue to insist on ronpaulforums of all the places that it is safe depending on the dose. Also, learn the difference between metallic and organic mercury before you spout more bullshit. Why don't you go and guzzle mercury and be done with it?
 
Mercury is a poison and there is no denying that fact, but dumbasses continue to insist on ronpaulforums of all the places that it is safe depending on the dose. Also, learn the difference between metallic and organic mercury before you spout more bullshit. Why don't you go and guzzle mercury and be done with it?

Hahahah! No need to get angry, bro. Let me help you with some toxicology.

A single atom of mercury is not dangerous. That's a fact. Two atoms of mercury are not dangerous. That's a fact. A single molecule of an organic mercury compound is not dangerous. Fact. When the dose of mercury increases to the point that it is dangerous depends on many factors. But by far the most important factor in the toxicity of mercury, as with virtually all toxic substances, is the dose. I can ingest cyanide with perfect safety if the dose is low enough and I kill can myself with water if the dose is high enough. This is science rather than emotion. Try it, you might like it.

Now, keep in mind that I am not advocating the deliberate ingestion of mercury (even for people who disagree with me). Nor am I advocating flu vaccines. But statements like "______ in any amount is dangerous" are simply false and should be corrected.
 
This does not support your statement that mercury is dangerous in any amount. It isn't. You are very interested in environmental and food toxicity, and that is a good thing. But if you want to avoid being mislead by hysterics, you really need to understand that toxicology is all about dose.

Injecting “trace amounts” of toxins

How different is it if you eat a lot of mercury, or you inject just a little? This is the argument which comes from most vaccine enthusiasts; “if it’s just a trace amount, it doesn’t matter.” The same advice would come from the FDA, except for the fact that they consider trace amounts non-existent and they still label trace amounts of mercury as thimerosal-free. So let’s do the math now. Let’s add up all the heavy metals in the routine “consumption” process most go through, including flu shots, vaccines, boosters, food, water, lotions, cosmetics, deodorants and so on, and you have a major problem.

Injecting mercury, aluminum, monosodium glutamate and formaldehyde sends a massive shock wave through your system, and jolts your central nervous system. Your immune system basically “freaks out” as the toxic injection completely bypasses the digestive system all together. Add in the fact that most shots are combination shots and given in close succession,especially to children and infants, and the problems are compounded exponentially.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/preserv...nd-flu-shots-still-contain-deadly-toxins.html
 
Hahahah! No need to get angry, bro. Let me help you with some toxicology.

A single atom of mercury is not dangerous. That's a fact. Two atoms of mercury are not dangerous. That's a fact. A single molecule of an organic mercury compound is not dangerous. Fact. When the dose of mercury increases to the point that it is dangerous depends on many factors. But by far the most important factor in the toxicity of mercury, as with virtually all toxic substances, is the dose. I can ingest cyanide with perfect safety if the dose is low enough and I kill can myself with water if the dose is high enough. This is science rather than emotion. Try it, you might like it.

Now, keep in mind that I am not advocating the deliberate ingestion of mercury (even for people who disagree with me). Nor am I advocating flu vaccines. But statements like "______ in any amount is dangerous" are simply false and should be corrected.

A single drop of organic mercury in an average size swimming pool makes it unsafe to swim in, but it must be okay to inject directly into children and pregnant women. The "scientific" journals approved the use of organic mercury for many decades and yet the pro-vaxxers sill want us to only believe the bullshit they continue to spew out. They lost all credibility, but we should believe them because they must be telling us the truth now. Fuck all scientific journals which previously told us that mercury and its derivatives are safe to use.
 
A single drop of organic mercury in an average size swimming pool makes it unsafe to swim in, but it must be okay to inject directly into children and pregnant women. The "scientific" journals approved the use of organic mercury for many decades and yet the pro-vaxxers sill want us to only believe the bullshit they continue to spew out. They lost all credibility, but we should believe them because they must be telling us the truth now. Fuck all scientific journals which previously told us that mercury and its derivatives are safe to use.

You quote my post but your response has nothing to do with what I posted. I have ventured no opinion at all on the safety of the flu vaccine.
 
Nothing here refutes the idea that the toxicity of mercury is dose-dependent.

Mercury accumulates in the kidneys and cross the blood brain barrier. From vaccines to fish and to cosmetics and dental fillings. So if it is does-dependent as you say, how would one know if they had too much?


We know that certain forms of mercury, such as methylmercury and phenylmercury, are highly lipid soluble, which makes the brain especially susceptible to mercury accumulation. These forms of mercury are found in vaccines as the preservative thimerosal. Once in the brain, it tends to attach itself to protein structures, especially to the cell membrane, where it can disrupt membrane functions.23 By binding to the cell membrane, mercury changes the membrane’s fluid-like quality, making it stiffer and causing the cell to age faster.24 The brain is unique in that neurons depend on special microscopic tube-like structures within the cell, appropriately called neurotubules, for their function. These neurotubules are manufactured by the cell from a substance called tubulin. We know that mercury interacts with tubulin causing it to unravel. Studies in rats have shown that doses of mercury corresponding to those seen in humans can cause a 75 percent increase in tubulin inhibition. Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 53

http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/2013/12/08/thimerosal-mercury-sacrificing-your-health-for-profit/

 
Back
Top