Peter Thiel at RNC: ‘Fake culture wars’ distract from broken economy

jct74

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 20, 2010
Messages
14,304
Peter Thiel at RNC: ‘Fake culture wars’ distract from broken economy

Peter Thiel at RNC: ‘Fake culture wars’ distract from broken economy

by Mike Murphy
July 21, 2016




Billionaire Silicon Valley venture capitalist Peter Thiel dismissed “fake culture wars” in a speech endorsing Donald Trump at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland on Thursday night, saying they distract from the real problems facing America.

“I am proud to be gay,” said Thiel, a co-founder of PayPal PYPL, and an outspoken libertarian. “I am proud to be a Republican,” he continued, despite a recently adopted Republican Party platform that is avidly opposed to same-sex marriage, and which critics have called the most anti-LGBT platform in history. Thiel was the first openly gay man to speak at the RNC since 2000.

“I don’t pretend to agree with every plank in our party’s platform. But fake culture wars only distract us from our economic decline,” Thiel said.

“When I was a kid, the great debate was about how to defeat the Soviet Union. And we won. Now we are told that the great debate is about who gets to use which bathroom. This is a distraction from our real problems. Who cares?”

...


read more:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/pe...-wars-distract-from-broken-economy-2016-07-21
 
Odd thing to hear at Trump's coronation, seeing as how his entire campaign was driven by fake culture war nonsense.
 
Odd thing to hear at Trump's coronation, seeing as how his entire campaign was driven by fake culture war nonsense.

Trump did not reignite the culture wars. He didn't really tackle religious topics, which was wise of him.
 
You are making shit up. The southern republicans are the anti-gay culture warriors.

Who said anything about gays?

The culture war is broader than that.

Every time Trump said something "unPC" he was throwing red meat to one side of the culture war.

Its specific content was usually racialist or nationalistic.
 
Who said anything about gays?

The culture war is broader than that.

Every time Trump said something "unPC" he was throwing red meat to one side of the culture war.

Its specific content was usually racialist or nationalistic.

Ya, but he was throwing red meat to the correct side of the culture war, even if all those on that side of it are not correct about everything.
 
Most of the issue he raised is aligned with Ron Paul. Stupid wars, blowback, hinted on inflation/the fed with the bubbles, fake culture wars. It's like he just replaced the name Ron Paul w/ Donald Trump. And the amazing thing is that the audience loves it! Nothing else to say except Ron Paul's legacy lives on!
 
Most of the issue he raised is aligned with Ron Paul. Stupid wars, blowback, hinted on inflation/the fed with the bubbles, fake culture wars. It's like he just replaced the name Ron Paul w/ Donald Trump. And the amazing thing is that the audience loves it! Nothing else to say except Ron Paul's legacy lives on!

Agree, but question is why has Peter Thiel fallen for Trump's façade while Ron Paul has not.
 
Agree, but question is why has Peter Thiel fallen for Trump's façade while Ron Paul has not.


Seems to me that this was an extremely self-serving speech. I'm not sure if you caught what he was selling, but he was talking about huge government investments in updating their technology. Mixed into his Ron Paulisms was nothing but an out-stretched palm waiting for the payback.

I just lost respect for Thiel.

Listen to the speech again and tell me you don't hear it. He was wearing his cronyist hat last night.
 
Seems to me that this was an extremely self-serving speech. I'm not sure if you caught what he was selling, but he was talking about huge government investments in updating their technology. Mixed into his Ron Paulisms was nothing but an out-stretched palm waiting for the payback.

I just lost respect for Thiel.

Listen to the speech again and tell me you don't hear it. He was wearing his cronyist hat last night.

This point and LatinsForPaul point (on why Ron Paul has not fallen on Trumps facade) are definitely legitimate concerns. And yes, I did hear the hint of big government spending. I would like to think though that it wouldn't be sweetheart deals (e.g. we shouldn't tolerate incompetence in government.)

Do you remember what Ron said in the past about taking the trillions we spent overseas on our military adventures? That he suggested that we stop that, take half of it to pay down the debt and the rest on our domestic infrastructure. If this moves the needle back some, I think that's a good thing. There is no one else standing up on this.
 
This point and LatinsForPaul point (on why Ron Paul has not fallen on Trumps facade) are definitely legitimate concerns. And yes, I did hear the hint of big government spending. I would like to think though that it wouldn't be sweetheart deals (e.g. we shouldn't tolerate incompetence in government.)

Do you remember what Ron said in the past about taking the trillions we spent overseas on our military adventures? That he suggested that we stop that, take half of it to pay down the debt and the rest on our domestic infrastructure. If this moves the needle back some, I think that's a good thing. There is no one else standing up on this.

Ugh, it's still cronyism. In lobbyist-speak, Thiel is saying, "Quit giving money to the MIC special interests and give it to my special interest!"

Of course he thinks his own special interest is more important - they all do. And they all make the same case.
 
Thiel's speech was good. Too bad he didn't get behind Rand. Makes no sense to me.

He got rich by investing in things that win. Rand couldn't win. Thiel is taking a gamble now. But the government money he'll sweep up through technology upgrades might be worth it.

Or yeah, he might have just fallen for the phony Trump-is-anti-establishment crap. But I don't think he would have won so big in investments without seeing behind a lot of erected facades.
 
Ya, but he was throwing red meat to the correct side of the culture war, even if all those on that side of it are not correct about everything.

In terms of policy, what they are correct about?

Restricting immigration? Protectionism?
 
Back
Top