Peter Schiff on Glenn Beck at 5

No1ButPaul08

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2007
Messages
2,613
Let's hope he's actually on this time.

For some reason he wasn't on last time he was supposed to be when the Judge hosted. I would guess the Judge is hosting again today.

Remember when Glenn Beck had Peter on all the time in his final months at CNNHN? When he moved to Fox he's very rarely had Peter on. That goes for all of Fox News and FBN, Peter used to be on these shows all the time, now he is rarely on. He clearly loves being on TV so I'm sure it's not his choice.
 
Did great. I knew he was going to plug his Senate candidacy. I wish they would mention it in their introductions.
 
Did great. I knew he was going to plug his Senate candidacy. I wish they would mention it in their introductions.
Yeah, I was hoping the host would have brought up his Senate run, but glad Schiff was able to throw it in at the very end.

Edit: Schiff is still on for second segment!
 
My mom was walking in the room and she was listening to him and she goes "Man I agree with him, what is his name?"

Woohoo, too bad we dont live in CT so we could vote for him :(
 
Scheuer: "Annihilate them!"

:rolleyes:


edit: Scheuer was asked what motivates them. "Because we are the biggest supporters of tyranny in the Muslim world"
 
Last edited:
he dropped the bombshell.

thank god he said it..


he actually outed the fact that the US government is the largest supporter of tyranny in the middle east and that this plus a couple other neo-conish things are the reasons why they hate us, and that until we understand that and change policy we cannot defeat them..


I thought it was perfect to start out as hawkish and then go in that direction.. genius.

I love Michael Sheuer..
 
Last edited:
Very good performance by Scheuer, made me nod my head in agreement multiple times.

Edit: Anybody else see the guy almost get hit by a light? :p
 
Sorry..I don't get the 'annihilate them' comment. Although he said that about U.S. tyrannising them, how does that square with annihilating or am I missing something? I was not impressed with that aspect of the interview. I can't imagine RP calling for annihilation of the monster the US Empire created in the first place. "Hey it was our fault but we are going to annihilate you anyway?" I'm obviously missing the subtleties of the 'American turn of phrase.' (I hope!) Can someone please explain?
 
Sorry..I don't get the 'annihilate them' comment. Although he said that about U.S. tyrannising them, how does that square with annihilating or am I missing something? I was not impressed with that aspect of the interview. I can't imagine RP calling for annihilation of the monster the US Empire created in the first place. "Hey it was our fault but we are going to annihilate you anyway?" I'm obviously missing the subtleties of the 'American turn of phrase.' (I hope!) Can someone please explain?

here is the problem with the neocon philosophy- everytime they kill someone with their cia drones, they make more terrorist. the only way they can win is to annihilate everyone there. the alternative to mass regional genocide is schuerer's suggestion.
 
Sorry..I don't get the 'annihilate them' comment. Although he said that about U.S. tyrannising them, how does that square with annihilating or am I missing something? I was not impressed with that aspect of the interview. I can't imagine RP calling for annihilation of the monster the US Empire created in the first place. "Hey it was our fault but we are going to annihilate you anyway?" I'm obviously missing the subtleties of the 'American turn of phrase.' (I hope!) Can someone please explain?

As an American, you should advocate the swift and efficient annihilation of all threats posed against us. The government's only legitimate role is to protect its citizens from force, both domestic and abroad. If you're not advocating the swift and efficient destruction of our enemies, then you're either advocating the altruistic and sophomoric empirical strategy we engage in now, or pacifism - neither of which lead to anything but the further loss of American blood and treasure.
 
Back
Top