HVACTech
Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2008
- Messages
- 3,736
See what I mean?
![]()
that was not an answer. it was evasion.
pure and simple word games.
why don't you explain it for us simpletons sir.

See what I mean?
![]()
that was not an answer. it was evasion.
pure and simple word games.
why don't you explain it for us simpletons sir.![]()
what is the difference between Anarchy, and Liberty? AF.
have you ever explained that? can you?![]()
that was not an answer. it was evasion.
pure and simple word games.
why don't you explain it for us simpletons sir.![]()
Emmanuel Kant said there were four kinds of government:
Law and freedom without force (anarchy). - What all humanity should strive for.
Law and force without freedom (despotism). What we have now.
Force without freedom and law (barbarism). What we are about to get.
Force with freedom and law (republic). What the original plan called for e.g. the DoI and Aoc, and what you would probably call "liberty".
No, but it failed at the task, making someone stop.
That said, I'm not of the idea it was powerless to stop it, especially with the Bill of Rights in place.
I think it has authorized this government, top to bottom, fair and square, legal beagle.
Can you? Haven't heard it yet.
on RPF's, the two are one and the same. conceptually.
in the larger world both are pretty much unknown subjects.
on RPF's, I would describe Liberty...
as "enlightened anarchy"
how would YOU distinguish them sir?![]()
why does the CONstitution not authorize lasers on stop signs?
THAT would work! right?
your logic fails me.. sir.![]()
in the larger world both are pretty much unknown subjects.
I agree with this.When peaceful change is made impossible, violent revolution is inevitable.
I realize youre calling for less name slinging and online hurting, but the root of the angst that exists on both sides will very soon spill over into the really real world, and the blood of many people will be spilled. We are failing to address the source of the anger, and that is, as a country, we have been $#@! on and dragged through the coals by our manipulative sociopathic warmongering representatives, who only really represent a continuation of the worst possible outcome. We have had it with people behind the scenes pulling strings. We are neck deep in corporations being given ever increasingly special treatment while human people are denied any path to a positive existence. We have empty pockets and see those who have something have achieved what they have by theft and coercion. We are held back by the laws that restrict us and enable them to behave the way they do.
Youre not going to simply "get rid of it". Its not just about Trump. It is about a buildup of "more of the same" from governments in general. That anger has been stoked and fed well before Trump, and will burn in the hearts and minds of the people long after Trump as long as the status quo maintains their stranglehold on the lifeblood of society. If you want to cast forth a meaningful change, then take this collective anger and redirect it to good use.
I agree with this too.Everything Mr.TV said here is correct. Trump isn't the problem. He's a symptom.
This too lolYou're no fun.
Stir the pot, rock the boat, rattle cages, yank chains, polarize, make waves, etc.. All in all, have a good fun educational time here.![]()
This too lol
Childish to do it, but that's what makes the interwebz fun lol
what is the difference between Anarchy, and Liberty? AF.
have you ever explained that? can you?![]()
Can you? Haven't heard it yet.
There is no answer, it's a trick question.
Liberty is user definable, from person to person and results may vary, while anarchy simply means "lacking a ruler".
All of this running around between us is from me supposedly "dissing" the constitution.
Sorry, but the faults are the faults.
The anti-feds pointed all these faults out, tried to warn everybody what was happening in Philadelphia, and what would happen in the future: that the fedgov would become a huge, all powerful, tyrannical monolith, the states would become vassals and the president would become an "almost" king exercising plenipotentiary powers with abandon.
They warned all of this would be authorized by the constitution then being debated.
Now, try and tell me all that has not happened and I'll call you delusional.