NerveShocker
Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 1,444
agreed
This is a good opportunity to team up with leftists.
I'm sure FireDogLake would love to join the coalition.
Yeah maybe we can remind them they're the "anti-war" party.
agreed
This is a good opportunity to team up with leftists.
I'm sure FireDogLake would love to join the coalition.
Not to rain on anyone's parade, but I never thought blimps were a good allocation of resources, and I think Tom Woods agrees ;P![]()
I understand on the surface it can seem that way but the blimp generated millions in publicity. We had media trackers to confirm this at a minimum. I don't think Tom knew that when he made his comment in the "For Liberty" movie. I think most people don't know that.
But just for discussion... doesn't getting a minimum of 4 times the money spent in publicity mean it was in fact a success?
Yeah, this blimp is definitely good for liberty.
I made the suggestion on the site for the blimp to say "END THE FED" on one side and "END THE WAR" on the other side.
But just for discussion... doesn't getting a minimum of 4 times the money spent in publicity mean it was in fact a success?
Walt, it was never about winning arigged horsepolitical race.
Apples and baseballs.
In fact, I see evidence of the contrary, Ron Paul is on the MSM several times a week now... Show me the evidence that the Blimp had nothing to do with that, b/c I recall seeing it on the LOCAL news.
I cannot show you evidence the blimp "didn't do" something, but it would be silly to say that the blimp had more to do with Ron Paul's publicity today, compared to the bills, his other speeches and what he's done AFTER giving up running for President.
if it was never about winning a rigged race, then I guess anybody who sent money to Paul's campaign (or any liberty candidates today) with any type of expectation it was a serious candidacy were CONNED. (wanna bet if these campaigns said "Hey, let's raise money and show how to stick it to them, we promise we won't spend it, and when its over, you can have it back" they'd raise much more?)
and JUST WHO WERE THEY "CONNED" BY?
NOT RON PAUL, THAT IS FOR SURE!
Get lost bloodseeker. YOU SUCK.
Why not Ron Paul?
How about everybody in the campaign who've happily accepted the contributions (if their mentality wasn't a serious run)?
Who are you to say it was never to win in a rigged race (who do you speak for)?
Let's address your FIRST ATTACK.
DIEBOLD.
Now give all us "ron paul people" YOUR history...
lmao...
my advice is get out while you are sill ahead, I am on #1.
ok, so because DIEBOLD, don't vote, is that correct?
does Ron Paul & his campaign share your views about DIEBOLD? Or does Ron Paul ask "can we translate this alleged spam and internet presence into votes"?
who cares about all these bills, PACs, tea parties or media coverage (according to you)? in the end VOTE COUNTERS rig it all, isn't that right?