Paul vs others chart

Alright. My version. I cleaned it up, fixed a few issues, reworded, etc (took out the very wierd "certain poeple" thing). Removed John Cox (who?).

Can someone confirm that you CAN bring a "voting guide" with you into the booth on election day?

http://rapidshare.com/files/84703066/2008_Presidentail_Comparison_Chart.xls.html

P.S. Sorry to bump an old thread, but these are GREAT to flood places with. Quick and cheap (b/w) to print.
 
Just wondering: Has anyone actually fact-checked to see if all of the positions stated for the other candidates are accurate? I would hate to be canvassing with this and have someone tell me that their favorite candidate's positions are misrepresented, undermining my credibility.

Anyone double-check the other positions?
 
this one need to be fixed. put Hillary on it because at my university and everyone is cheering for Hillary. If I post it up on my campus and they would said why I omitted Hillary and put Paul on spot.
 
this one need to be fixed. put Hillary on it because at my university and everyone is cheering for Hillary. If I post it up on my campus and they would said why I omitted Hillary and put Paul on spot.

What University. A Hillery supporter got boo'd in Poli Sci here in Texas...Paul got chatter and a few cheers.

also, my chart has Hillary.
 
I can easily add or take away anything in the chart. I think the PDF I made earlier is already pretty much dead on. Much more and it becomes overkill IMO. Applying the KISS concept is the way to go. A good idea, if youre going to use these for canvassing, is to fold it over from right to left, covering the candidates, and only leaving the YOU column open. They can read thru it, check off what they are for, and the open it and compare their answers to everyone elses.

Just a thought.
 
this one need to be fixed. put Hillary on it because at my university and everyone is cheering for Hillary. If I post it up on my campus and they would said why I omitted Hillary and put Paul on spot.

Did you read it? Hillary is on the list. :rolleyes:
 
I'm sorry but most of these charts are a joke.

the stances are not neutral and the single line of check marks by our guy really tip off that the presentation is loaded.

It's much better if the phrasing is flipped around a little and Paul is negative some times - let people think for themselves. They will anyway and recognize at least some of these charts as pure propaganda.

You can tell at a glance what the person presenting the information's agenda is at a glance and that's going to turn peoples minds off to that candidate. Let them compare and think for themselves.

-n
 
Back
Top