PAUL VOTERS BEING TURNED AWAY AT ADELSON

[michaelwise]

The appearance of hiding voter fraud from prying eyes is the issue.

This is a great weapon the public has and we should learn how to use extensively. No pun intended.

Upload Videos to Facebook in Real Time Using ZionEyez Sunglasses

"Majority of social networking users use these sites to share different media specially videos with their friends and relatives. However, this involved a bit tedious exercise of recording the video manually through mobile or digital camera, then uploading the same through computers or smart phones. But now, you can upload the videos directly (as you record) to social networking sites as well as other video streaming sites like Qik, Live stream etc. ZionEyez has created this innovative sunglasses which can be used to record and upload videos directly to the social networking sites like Facebook in real time. This is done at click of a button and built in camera in ZionEyez sunglasses starts recording videos and transfers them via Bluetooth or WiFi. The whole operation is totally hands free and you don’t have to manually hold any thing and go through a pain of watching the scene being recorded through miniature screen. Rather, you can continue to enjoy the event, scene with your eyes and the same view as what your eyes see gets recorded and streamed."

http://www.hacktik.com/upload-videos-to-facebook-in-real-time-using-zioneyez-sunglasses.html/

 

[kylejack]

Regardless of the GOP being a private party a business, or organization CANNOT discriminate.

What law are you referring to? There's nothing that bans the GOP from discriminating on religion in the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

 

[dillo]

HE ALREADY VOTED EARLIER. This is for people who couldn't vote earlier in the day because of religious reasons. THIS IS NOT ILLEGAL, I saw the whole story, you guys are wrong, and that guy made a total fool of himself and likely gave us an even worse "crazy" rep than we have now, as much as we scream about other's not doing their research you guys are quick to be just like them.

Its not illegal to have a special caucas that caters to a certain group, however you cannot legally discriminate against someone based on relgion. They can have a non-Sabbath caucas but they can't tell non-jews they can't vote their.

 

[kylejack]

And for all of you that say it is a party decision you would be right if this was not all on taxpayer dime so it is not just private property and a private organization they have put a public thing paid for with public money to special caucuses and special rules and that should not be allowed

How's it on the taxpayer dime? Are you claiming that the GOP didn't pay to rent facilities at the college? What's your source?

 

[kylejack]

Its not illegal to have a special caucas that caters to a certain group, however you cannot legally discriminate against someone based on relgion. They can have a non-Sabbath caucas but they can't tell non-jews they can't vote their.

Which law?

 

[Dianne]

Time for a revolution... no joke guys and gals... the time has come to overthrow the corruption... dem yourself, and empower yourself to protect, defend the Constitution.


The United States is a banana republic, if you allow it to continue...

It is youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu !!!!!! youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu !!!!!! that can fight the true Mafia; the United States Owned, Controlled, Sactioned... news media and the organized crime ring that controls them..

 

[wowrevolution]

They are participating in a GOP event. Either they let the people in or all their votes get thrown out.

 

[UtahApocalypse]

Sorry, but that's just not true. The party can decide who they want to cater to. In this case they decided there was a significant enough Jewish and Seventh Day Adventist population to hold a late caucus.

What law are you referring to? There's nothing that bans the GOP from discriminating on religion in the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

So if I have a restaurant I can demand you to declare your religion before you eat there?

 

[kylejack]

So if I have a restaurant I can demand you to declare your religion before you eat there?

Title II of CRA 1964 bans your restaurant from discriminating on the basis of religion.

(b) Each of the following establishments which serves the public is a place of public accommodation within the meaning of this title if its operations affect commerce, or if discrimination or segregation by it is supported by State action:

(1) any inn, hotel, motel, or other establishment which provides lodging to transient guests, other than an establishment located within a building which contains not more than five rooms for rent or hire and which is actually occupied by the proprietor of such establishment as his residence;

(2) any restaurant, cafeteria, lunchroom, lunch counter, soda fountain, or other facility principally engaged in selling food for consumption on the premises, including, but not limited to, any such facility located on the premises of any retail establishment; or any gasoline station;

(3) any motion picture house, theater, concert hall, sports arena, stadium or other place of exhibition or entertainment; and

(4) any establishment (A)(i) which is physically located within the premises of any establishment otherwise covered by this subsection, or (ii) within the premises of which is physically located any such covered establishment, and (B) which holds itself out as serving patrons of such covered establishment.

 

[brandon13830]

So if I have a restaurant I can demand you to declare your religion before you eat there?

You also can't only allow Republicans into your restaurant. The GOP can do this with their caucus.

 

[LiveForHonortune]

To think our own government had the gall to point out the vote fraud in Russia. Ridiculous hypocrisy, guess that's why they love Newt.

 

[dillo]

Which law?

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII)
This law makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex. The law also makes it illegal to retaliate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit. The law also requires that employers reasonably accommodate applicants' and employees' sincerely held religious practices, unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the employer's business.

 

[ericthethe]

So if I have a restaurant I can demand you to declare your religion before you eat there?

Ron Paul would argue the owners have the right, yes.

 

[sailingaway]

Which law?

doesn't need one. Let the GOP explain why it IS ok to discriminate by religion, and bye bye GOP.

 

[sailingaway]

Ron Paul would argue the owners have the right, yes.

Not when this is supposed to be a representative republic and the parties have obtained a non representative government enforced monopoly. Busting that monopoly would be fine restitution.

 

[kylejack]

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII)
This law makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex. The law also makes it illegal to retaliate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit. The law also requires that employers reasonably accommodate applicants' and employees' sincerely held religious practices, unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the employer's business.

Title VII covers employment, not attending a caucus.

 

[Melissa]

How's it on the taxpayer dime? Are you claiming that the GOP didn't pay to rent facilities at the college? What's your source?

Maybe your right on the Caucasus but I have a primary and the parties make the rules for these and people would say they are allowed because they are private organizations but all the people working them and the machines are all paid by taxpayer as if it was a normal party election

 

[sailingaway]

Title VII covers employment, not attending a caucus.

explain that to rank and file GOP. Who believe they have 'representation' in the party.

 

[SCOTUSman]

They should have voted at the morning caucuses. There was no reason to wait until the night.

 

[wowrevolution]

If they turn away anyone it would be a straw poll, and not part of the GOP Caucus. Any registered republican is allowed to vote. If they turn any registered republican away they are a straw poll only.