And for those of you with wead-connections, are you putting front and center our disgust with the preaching to the choir and the surface-level off-the-cuff rally speeches? And should Wead ever respond to this most important objection which I doubt he will, would you please post his response.
We insist on speeches and forums with well thought out detailed plans for achieving specific goals as well as Q&A's with undecided voters at churches, synagogues, mosques, bowling alleys, sports books, racetracks. We want to see Ron go head-to-head with the people.
He could go for broke and make this all worthwhile and maybe even avert one of these maniacs from being the one with their finger on the button. But I think if anything was going to change, it would have happened by now. Kind of like what some people say about the government, if it really was ever going to be abolished, it would have happened already.
Like I said before, I think that just about all of Ron's constituencies have their individual statist-blind spots which cause them to be happy when Ron is NOT talking and visible. Some don't want him talking in front of the fundy christians about Iran, some don't want him talking about immigration in front of the rednecks, etc. And so we seldom get Ron un-muffled.
I've also been suggesting--but nobody seems to care of course--to use this once-in-a-century platform to showcase all of Ron's fact checkers and foreign policy experts and journalists who can document the lies of the military-media complex. This ain't happening and I know it ain't going to happen either, but I just want to go on the record after Rick Santorum starts WWIII of having proposed a simple way it all could have been stopped.