Paul 3rd 21% of the vote

Sevryn45

Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
58
Look at the big pie chart, they erased his name but add up the numbers they all equal to 21%.

Also they are not updating his numbers live anywhere, he's not far behind Romney.... we might have a chance to get 2nd.

Were close to beating Romeny, he's at 23% were close to 21% we might beat him.
 
Look at the big pie chart, they erased his name but add up the numbers they all equal to 21%.

Also they are not updating his numbers live anywhere, he's not far behind Romney.... we might have a chance to get 2nd.

Were close to beating Romeny, he's at 23% were close to 21% we might beat him.

Link?
 
Look at the big pie chart, they erased his name but add up the numbers they all equal to 21%.

Also they are not updating his numbers live anywhere, he's not far behind Romney.... we might have a chance to get 2nd.

Were close to beating Romeny, he's at 23% were close to 21% we might beat him.

That blank pie unfortunately includes more then just Paul in it. So I don't think that your numbers are right :(
 
Look at the big pie chart, they erased his name but add up the numbers they all equal to 21%.

Also they are not updating his numbers live anywhere, he's not far behind Romney.... we might have a chance to get 2nd.

Were close to beating Romeny, he's at 23% were close to 21% we might beat him.

No. Giuliani is missing as well. 10% + 11% = 21%.
 
Look at that pie chart, Paul's name is the one that is blanked out, that blanked out pie has 21% that's paul..... add up the numbers.
 
I'm starting to get seriously annoyed at that chart. they can put in Richardson at 2% on the dem chart.
 
It's on CNN, it's there chart not mine. The missing pie = 21% or it did when i counted up all the votes to 100% at that time. Maybe the missing chart is more the RP that i dunno.
 
Back
Top