Patriot Act Extension FAILS

In 2010, 10 Republicans in the House opposed.

Today, 26.

Small progress, but progress.

I wonder how the vote will be in the Senate.
 
These are the 26 GOP Nay votes.

So far, I only see one or two "tea party" people.

Amash
Bartlett
Bishop (UT)
Broun (GA)
Campbell
Duncan (TN)
Fitzpatrick
Gibson
Graves (GA)
Heller
Hultgren
Johnson (IL)
Jones
Kingston
Labrador
Mack
Marchant
McClintock
Paul
Rehberg
Roe (TN)
Rohrabacher
Schilling
Schweikert
Woodall
Young (AK)
 
Unbelievably, my rep John Campbell (R) voted no! He used to be pretty much a serious neocon. He also surprised me by voting with RP on something else recently.
 
Thanks to your dedicated efforts, the motion to suspend the rules and pass the extension of three PATRIOT Act provisions failed tonight in the House of Representatives!

Does this mean the terrorists have won? :p
 
So wait, the Patriot Act was not extended and thus is not able to be used anymore? Or were just certain things not added?
 
So wait, the Patriot Act was not extended and thus is not able to be used anymore? Or were just certain things not added?

I believe some key survelliance provisions were not extended. Someone correct me if I'm wrong here...
 
These are the 26 GOP Nay votes.

So far, I only see one or two "tea party" people.

Amash
Bartlett
Bishop (UT)
Broun (GA)
Campbell
Duncan (TN)
Fitzpatrick
Gibson
Graves (GA)
Heller
Hultgren
Johnson (IL)
Jones
Kingston
Labrador
Mack
Marchant
McClintock
Paul
Rehberg
Roe (TN)
Rohrabacher
Schilling
Schweikert
Woodall
Young (AK)

McClintock is fairly Tea.
 
So wait, the Patriot Act was not extended and thus is not able to be used anymore? Or were just certain things not added?

They wanted to extend it through a quick procedure or something like that. I think they can still vote for it through the regular procedure.

But I am not sure. I might be wrong.
 
Last edited:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_of_the_rules_in_the_United_States_Congress
Suspension of the rules is a procedure generally used to quickly pass non-controversial bills in the United States House of Representatives.
A motion to suspend the rules is in order on Mondays and Tuesdays and towards the end of a session of Congress and may only be made by the Speaker of the House or their designee, though it is customary for committee chairs to write the Speaker requesting a suspension. Once a member makes a motion to "suspend the rules" and take some action, debate is limited to 40 minutes, no amendments can be offered to the motion or the underlying matter, and a 2/3 majority of Members present and voting is required to agree to the motion.

http://rules.house.gov/singlepages.aspx?NewsID=91
Items to be considered under suspension of the rules:
# H.R. 514, A bill to extend expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 and Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 relating to access to business records, individual terrorists as agents of foreign powers, and roving wiretaps until December 8, 2011.

LOL apparently they didn't realize this was a controversial issue.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top