Paleoconservative Radio

[PaleoConPrep]

I'm sick of listening to mainstream talk radio. Are there any Paleoconservative/Old Right radio shows?

 

[dannno]

Does it have to be am/fm radio? What about podcasts?

Tom Woods? Gary North?

 

[PaleoConPrep]

Podcast would be great.

 

[Southron]

The Mike Church Show, The Political Cesspool.

 

[Rad]

Scott Horton would be Old Right (Libertarian): http://scotthorton.org/

He has serious discussions with his interviewees. I've learned a lot from them.

 

[erowe1]

I don't really listen to any. But check out Free Talk Live:
https://www.freetalklive.com/

Also, check out all the audio that's available at mises.org.
https://mises.org/

All of these would be much more along the lines of the Old Right (i.e. libertarian), as opposed to paleoconservative.

 

[nobody's_hero]

Though he considers himself an independent, I'd recommend Jerry Doyle on this list.

http://www.trn1.com/the-jerry-doyle-show-senator-rand-paul-joins-jerry-to-talk-about-the-presid

 

[paleocon1]

Does it have to be am/fm radio? What about podcasts?

Tom Woods? Gary North?

Neither is a paleocon.

 

[juleswin]

Neither is a paleocon.

Paleocon/old right.

Tom Woods is definitely old right guy

 

[Rad]

The only Paleocon radio host I can think of is the Southern Avenger and he doesn't do that anymore: https://youtu.be/2PH2l_EIPI0

He was good at it. What happened to Charles Goyette?

 

[Christian Liberty]

Gary North is a theonomist

 

[William Tell]

I'm sick of listening to mainstream talk radio. Are there any Paleoconservative/Old Right radio shows?

Liberty Roundtable with Sam Bushman is the main show that comes to my mind.
http://www.libertyroundtable.com/

Some of the other shows at these links may appeal to you in addition to that one.

http://libertynewsradio.com/
http://gcnlive.com/

 

[Tywysog Cymru]

Chuck Baldwin had a radio show in the past, I don't know if he still does though.

 

[erowe1]

Neither is a paleocon.

The OP said either paleocon or Old Right.

 

[Tywysog Cymru]

The OP said either paleocon or Old Right.

Just wondering, what's the difference?

 

[erowe1]

Just wondering, what's the difference?

The Old Right is a libertarian-conservative movement of the early 20th century that opposed welfare and warfare. A lot of champions of the Old Right, like Albert Nock, Garet Garrett, H. L. Mencken, and Rose Wilder Lane, are still read and revered by libetarians.

Paleo-conservatism is a later 20th century movement that carries over some things from the Old Right, especially noninterventionism. But all-in-all it's more of a big government movement, rather than a small government one.

I think the Old Right got its name to distinguish it from what was considered the New Right in the 1960's, being more interventionist, like Buckley and Goldwater. Interestingly, by today's standards, the old New Right would fit much better in the libertarian wing of the GOP than anywhere else, and the Old Right was even more libertarian than that. Where the Old Right still lives today is in what most people now call libertarianism.

And I think paleocons got their name to distinguish themselves from neocons, for much the same reason--noninterventionist versus interventionist foreign policy.

 

[Tywysog Cymru]

Paleo-conservatism is a later 20th century movement that carries over some things from the Old Right, especially noninterventionism. But all-in-all it's more of a big government movement, rather than a small government one.

From what I've observed, it depends on the individual Paleocon. The Paleocons who rabidly support Donald Trump would fall into that category. On the other hand, Chuck Baldwin is a Paleocon who I would take over "libertarians" like Gary Johnson any day.

I used to consider myself a paleocon, but then my views on immigration and tariffs changed and now I'm a libertarian. I still consider the principled paleocons to be allies.

 

[erowe1]

From what I've observed, it depends on the individual Paleocon. The Paleocons who rabidly support Donald Trump would fall into that category. On the other hand, Chuck Baldwin is a Paleocon who I would take over "libertarians" like Gary Johnson any day.

I used to consider myself a paleocon, but then my views on immigration and tariffs changed and now I'm a libertarian. I still consider the principled paleocons to be allies.

Yeah, I see Chuck Baldwin as more libertarian. And I think his own political orientation has shifted a lot over the years. He used to be at the very heart of what was known as the religious right, and today he openly criticizes that movement. Here's what he posted on Facebook just today:

I was there. I was on the inside. I witnessed it up close and personal.
The rank and file were sincere. But those higher up only wanted a seat at the king's table and increased wealth and influence--and they were willing to compromise EVERYTHING to get it.
The so called Religious Right gave us the Bush/Clinton Crime Family. It put the neocons in power--and they have retained power even during Democrat administrations. It gave us preemptive war. It gave us perpetual war. It created the Muslim wars. It gave us the Patriot Act, NDAA, and Military Commissions Act. It gave us DHS. It gave us a burgeoning Police State. And it continues to contribute to the demise of liberty in our land.
Call me all the names you want: but I was there. I was on the inside. I witnessed it up close and personal. America's pastors and churches were, and are, MOST responsible for the collapse of liberty and constitutional government in America.
Forget politics. Fix the pulpits and you'll fix the country.

 

[William Tell]

From what I've observed, it depends on the individual Paleocon. The Paleocons who rabidly support Donald Trump would fall into that category. On the other hand, Chuck Baldwin is a Paleocon who I would take over "libertarians" like Gary Johnson any day.

I used to consider myself a paleocon, but then my views on immigration and tariffs changed and now I'm a libertarian. I still consider the principled paleocons to be allies.

You understand more correctly what Paleocons are, Erowe does not. Trump does not fit in with traditional Paleocon views, although some who identify as Paleocons unfortunately support him.

 

[erowe1]

You understand more correctly what Paleocons are, Erowe does not. Trump does not fit in with traditional Paleocon views, although some who identify as Paleocons unfortunately support him.

I'm not the one who identified Trump with traditional paleocon views. It was the person you claimed more correctly understood paleocons who did that.

What did I say about paleocons that you think was incorrect?