sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
And Iowa Republican is crowing over it: http://theiowarepublican.com/2013/r...air-races-former-paul-backers-thwarted-again/
The vote totals weren't even close and the turnout from the RP people was embarrassing. I'm getting the impression the organizational aspect has either completely failed or RP regulars are just one trick ponies. Show up for one convention and then never exert effort again. This is where the establishment is smart, just wait out the noobs and they'll go back to bed. With Woods' tour coming up he can inspire the ideas of liberty but hopefully C4L will be there steering these recruits into action. My only downside to this tour and Paul's campus appearances is that while there are orgs there to sign people up to get engaged, a hearty portion of each speech on the issues needs to stress that the ideas of liberty are meaningless w/o organizational mobilization.
I get the whole individualist mentality turn out routine but staying engaged is a must especially if one is an educator first and foremost. Events like these are when ideas are showcased and spread to others of like minds. Spreading libertarian ideals to those that aren't engaged is less meaningful than doing so to those that are. People can preach on about how tight their libertarian chastity belt is but if they don't show up nothing matters. That's why sometimes the sentiment comes across that the libertarian engaged politicos must network w/ teocons and social conservatives over their purified brethren because you have to formulate a winning plan w/ those that are likely to show up and get busy. The establishment of both parties is the enemy but certain elements of the purified it seems would rather be at odds with their politico cousins instead all in the name of keeping the message pure. I suppose there's value in the that to some extent but if that's the end-all be-all to that element's pursuit, then it becomes worth less (not worthless). I didn't really want to go here but in the end, couldn't avoid it. So I'll close with: ideals w/o mobilization to activism are worthless.Or they could individually turn out when there is a cause they consider worth the effort. Not seeing someone on the horizon they personally find worth the effort does not make you a one trick pony.
This seems to have been a really large drop off, though.
You are so right, if I could give you 10 +reps for this I would. Speaking for us here in MA, it is extremely frustrating how, apart from our "inner circle" of loyal activists, most liberty people don't show up to anything that doesn't have Ron Paul's name attached to it. It seems like they were so stuck in this idea that Ron Paul was the only person who could restore our liberty and now that he lost the world is over. It's amazing how much this movement can accomplish when we are motivated, but we need to get away from this hero-worshipping bullshit and start mobilizing on the local level.
We need to start helping liberty people understand this. Any thoughts on how that can be done effectively?
You are so right, if I could give you 10 +reps for this I would. Speaking for us here in MA, it is extremely frustrating how, apart from our "inner circle" of loyal activists, most liberty people don't show up to anything that doesn't have Ron Paul's name attached to it. It seems like they were so stuck in this idea that Ron Paul was the only person who could restore our liberty and now that he lost the world is over. It's amazing how much this movement can accomplish when we are motivated, but we need to get away from this hero-worshipping bullshit and start mobilizing on the local level.
We need to start helping liberty people understand this. Any thoughts on how that can be done effectively?
I get the whole individualist mentality turn out routine but staying engaged is a must especially if one is an educator first and foremost. Events like these are when ideas are showcased and spread to others of like minds. Spreading libertarian ideals to those that aren't engaged is less meaningful than doing so to those that are. People can preach on about how tight their libertarian chastity belt is but if they don't show up nothing matters. That's why sometimes the sentiment comes across that the libertarian engaged politicos must network w/ teocons and social conservatives over their purified brethren because you have to formulate a winning plan w/ those that are likely to show up and get busy. The establishment of both parties is the enemy but certain elements of the purified it seems would rather be at odds with their politico cousins instead all in the name of keeping the message pure. I suppose there's value in the that to some extent but if that's the end-all be-all to that element's pursuit, then it becomes worth less (not worthless). I didn't really want to go here but in the end, couldn't avoid it. So I'll close with: ideals w/o mobilization to activism are worthless.
Last I heard, my county is meeting in the next few days. I already RSVP'd that I most likely will not attend. I have surgery tomorrow. I doubt if I'll make it. It's not the only meeting I've had to miss this winter. I am hopeful that it will be the last, though.
I disagree that it is hero worship, what I see is people motivated by any candidate with those consistent views, expressed along with the message. If there isn't a candidate there with that persona, they may not be as motivated. I think it is self defeating to beat people up as hero worshiping since they just dislike you and want to be around you even less. It is just a character attack.
Think about what might motivate them.
It isn't people's fault that they aren't motivated by McCain, or any other candidate who doesn't appeal to them.
But I think you're misunderstanding my point - I guarantee you there will be energy for Rand's campaign in 4 years, even in spite of the fact that there are people with objections to him (although those seem to be fading). People are mesmerized by the top of the ticket, but as soon as those "sexy" big-ticket races are over, those people disappear. The most important work is not done during the campaign, the most important work is done in the years leading up to the campaign.
I don't know that that is as important as people make out, the 'top' of the ticket. Particularly to our sort. If I were there I'd be trying to find a more junior person who is really engaging. What about Leah Cole?
Leah is great - but believe it or not, most of Leah's organization has come from the social conservatives (who in this state are our anti-establishment allies). Other than the 10 or so liberty people in this state who are really active and have been increasing our standing within the party, we have a hard time mobilizing people.
I'm not just talking about campaigns here. I'm talking about conventions and state committee meetings and things like that where we really need to make our mark.
Were they aware of the fact that Gunny was running?
I know what you are saying. I'm saying people might be more motivated, if you care, if you make a star of a junior candidate, who is really good. Make them the example of the change people would be creating.
--
edit, look, I don't know your situation where you are. It just seems self defeating to gripe about people not being motivated rather than to try to find the principles people were fighting for in genuine candidates at whatever level, to ask people to turn out.