One True Path to Liberty®

[Origanalist]

And I still haven't got my order....

 

[Sola_Fide]

Is this sold on Rand's webstore?

 

[francisco]

epic thread is epic.

has the NSA sequestered Occam in a "secure" location??

 

[Origanalist]

Is this sold on Rand's webstore?

If it's not it should be.

 

[francisco]

Is this sold on Rand's webstore?

Too "inside baseball" for the general public. RPF is the 1% that would "get it".

 

[Origanalist]

epic thread is epic.

has the NSA sequestered Occam in a "secure" location??

Could be, he's not been around that I'm aware of.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Will my One True Path to Liberty® make it so I am always right and everyone else is always wrong? I need something that protects me from other ideas.

Too late, you didn't purchase soon enough and have been caught speculating.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?471555-A-lawful-and-peaceful-revolution

Brought to you by truepathtechnologies unlimited as described in the framing documents.

Could be, he's not been around that I'm aware of.

No way!

He's as free as a bird and occupied with entertaining sheep.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Perfect.

 

[HVACTech]

There is only One True Path to Liberty®! Get yours today!

Imagine the pride and satisfaction you'll feel knowing that your One True Path to Liberty® is the only path to freedom you or anyone else will ever need!

With One True Path to Liberty®, you can rest assured that you'll have the only genuine approach to freedom that can possibly be of any use or value!

Easy to store! No messy dialectics! Comes with our official Certificate of Authenticity - available only with genuine One True Path to Liberty® products!

One True Path to Liberty® comes in a variety of models, including Purist, Gradualist, Absolutist, Utilitarian, Anarchist, Minarchist and many, many more!

Accept no substitutes! Supplies are limited! Order your One True Path to Liberty® now!

I am happy that I got to see this post!
my friend is now on the advanced course at Hillsdale college.

http://lp.hillsdale.edu/constitutio...=drtv&utm_content=website&utm_campaign=con101

I will not take the course untill he has finished. so far, my education is holding up pretty good. against his.
he alerted me to just what an "anti-federalist" is....
and that has caused me some friction around here.

myself, I find the disparity between "one true path to Liberty" and your Bastiat sig line amusing...

is the one true path to Liberty, an understanding of what "Law" is?

and just how does one understand the meaning of this 3 letter word?

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

I am happy that I got to see this post!
my friend is now on the advanced course at Hillsdale college.

http://lp.hillsdale.edu/constitutio...=drtv&utm_content=website&utm_campaign=con101

I will not take the course untill he has finished. so far, my education is holding up pretty good. against his.
he alerted me to just what an "anti-federalist" is....
and that has caused me some friction around here.

myself, I find the disparity between "one true path to Liberty" and your Bastiat sig line amusing...

is the one true path to Liberty, an understanding of what "Law" is?

and just how does one understand the meaning of this 3 letter word?

If that made you happy, this out to have you ROTFFLYAO. Not adaptation I'm posting, but how it was used in the "constitutional threat" thread to counter the group effort to ridicule the prime constitutional intent of the purpose of free speech within the plan for a lawful and peaceful revolution.

Yes! Cease being influenced by covert agents pretending to care about the constitution and liberty. You too can envision a constitutional republic and assure the tyrants of Walmartia cannot complete their plot of dominance!

End that putrid smell around your television, newspaper and computer, especially while while logged into forums. Even this one.

With your dedicated use of this fully lawful plan, personally guaranteed by Thomas Jeffereson himself, you will proudly and safely walk the
One True Path to Liberty®!

Accept no fakes, experience the breathless feeling of hope investing in the fact that all Americans, even morons and young children can readily accept without hesitation!

Rest assured that all of your pissing and moaning will amount to a new golden age for Americans, if not all of humanity when freedom of speech gains an official purpose! Your One True Path to Liberty® package contains simple easy to understand steps that assure Americans can lawfully, completely control government, even abolish it if our steps to liberty are not carefully followed by the wanna-be despots now yanking your chain.

See free speech gain profound purpose.

See your carefully cast vote finally mean something!

End the scurrilous corrupt funding of political campaigns forever.

Accept no substitutes, no empty plans, only invest in this path carefully carved out of the framing documents for you and your loved ones to follow into our glorious future.

OB's post is satire, my adaptation is also, but it's satire of a lame and unconstitutional effort to bash the notion of using the constitution to defend itself and secure liberty.

What is ironic, is that what OB uses satirically, nonsensically in an effort to bash a lawful and peaceful revolution in an environment where everyone is essentially defining reasons we need a revolution; is pretty much factual and reasonable in my adaptation.

And fact that no one will even try to argue that free speech does not have the purpose I find logically by breaking down the framing documents, proves it. By their own unaccountability the veracity of the plan for a lawful and peaceful revolution is completely viable.

Now that's irony.

 

[HVACTech]

If that made you happy, this out to have you ROTFFLYAO. Not adaptation I'm posting, but how it was used in the "constitutional threat" thread to counter the group effort to ridicule the prime constitutional intent of the purpose of free speech within the plan for a lawful and peaceful revolution.

Yes! Cease being influenced by covert agents pretending to care about the constitution and liberty. You too can envision a constitutional republic and assure the tyrants of Walmartia cannot complete their plot of dominance!

End that putrid smell around your television, newspaper and computer, especially while while logged into forums. Even this one.

With your dedicated use of this fully lawful plan, personally guaranteed by Thomas Jeffereson himself, you will proudly and safely walk the
One True Path to Liberty®!

Accept no fakes, experience the breathless feeling of hope investing in the fact that all Americans, even morons and young children can readily accept without hesitation!

Rest assured that all of your pissing and moaning will amount to a new golden age for Americans, if not all of humanity when freedom of speech gains an official purpose! Your One True Path to Liberty® package contains simple easy to understand steps that assure Americans can lawfully, completely control government, even abolish it if our steps to liberty are not carefully followed by the wanna-be despots now yanking your chain.

See free speech gain profound purpose.

See your carefully cast vote finally mean something!

End the scurrilous corrupt funding of political campaigns forever.

Accept no substitutes, no empty plans, only invest in this path carefully carved out of the framing documents for you and your loved ones to follow into our glorious future.

OB's post is satire, my adaptation is also, but it's satire of a lame and unconstitutional effort to bash the notion of using the constitution to defend itself and secure liberty.

What is ironic, is that what OB uses satirically, nonsensically in an effort to bash a lawful and peaceful revolution in an environment where everyone is essentially defining reasons we need a revolution; is pretty much factual and reasonable in my adaptation.

And fact that no one will even try to argue that free speech does not have the purpose I find logically by breaking down the framing documents, proves it. By their own unaccountability the veracity of the plan for a lawful and peaceful revolution is completely viable.

Now that's irony.

your writing style is similar to Osans.

TRUST me my friend. I KNOW how to baffle people with bullshit.
this is why I can tell when someone else is doing it.

you have OCD with "free speech". in fact, you use your free speech, to talk about free speech.
obfuscation much?

And fact that no one will even try to argue that free speech does not have the purpose I find logically by breaking down the framing documents, proves it. By their own unaccountability the veracity of the plan for a lawful and peaceful revolution is completely viable.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

your writing style is similar to Osans.

That can't be accurate because his style circles around reinforcing his unaccountability.

I'm accountable.

TRUST me my friend. I KNOW how to baffle people with bullshit.
this is why I can tell when someone else is doing it.

You will have to prove that to retain credibility with the lurkers.

you have OCD with "free speech". in fact, you use your free speech, to talk about free speech.
obfuscation much?

There is no free speech on dot com.

I use my speech here very carefully to expose those that do not want its purpose known and accepted as prime constitutional intent. I expose them by presenting exactly how the framing documents define the purpose, despite the fact such purpose is not directly stated.

So here is the question you need to answer to demonstrate your reasonable accountability to your pretense of supporting the constitution.

What did the framers intend to serve the purpose of adequately uniting the people to have the power to alter or abolish government powerful enough to be destructive to unalienable rights IF free speech was not intended to serve that purpose?

There is an alternative answer and that is to state the framers DID NOT intend for the people to be able to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights.

What shall it be?

 

[HVACTech]

That can't be accurate because his style circles around reinforcing his unaccountability.

I'm accountable.



You will have to prove that to retain credibility with the lurkers.



There is no free speech on dot com.

I use my speech here very carefully to expose those that do not want its purpose known and accepted as prime constitutional intent. I expose them by presenting exactly how the framing documents define the purpose, despite the fact such purpose is not directly stated.

So here is the question you need to answer to demonstrate your reasonable accountability to your pretense of supporting the constitution.

What did the framers intend to serve the purpose of adequately uniting the people to have the power to alter or abolish government powerful enough to be destructive to unalienable rights IF free speech was not intended to serve that purpose?

There is an alternative answer and that is to state the framers DID NOT intend for the people to be able to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights.

What shall it be?

sir, that WAS the purpose of our Constitution.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

sir, that WAS the purpose of our Constitution.

That does not answer the question. It imposes circularity. It is ambiguous. It is evasion.

I will ask again in case you are confused.

What did the framers intend to serve the purpose of adequately uniting the people to have the power to alter or abolish government powerful enough to be destructive to unalienable rights IF free speech was not intended to serve that purpose?

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

The constitution did not enable unity. It was the product of unity. Article V enabled the right to "alter or abolish" in a codified form directed by the states, respecting the structure of the Articles of Confederation, but it did not enable the unity to have those states acting to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights.

That requires unity of the people.

There was social sabotage at very high levels between 1776 and 1792. Loyalists gathered to limit the empowerment to the people by demanding the most brief of statements that were free of philosophical content which the people relate to more readily than mechanistic language of law.

That was the "Greater Meaning Of Free Speech", which "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" were derived from. The loyalists were able to truncate that in the Declaration of Independence and ALTOGETHER eliminate those principles and values from the First Amendment in 1792!!!!

Therefore this is the draft of the proposed revision to the First Amendment I recommend.

REV. Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; Congress shall see that nothing abridges the freedom of speech and the primary methods or systems of it shall not be abridged and be first accessible for the purpose of the unity of the people in order to alter or abolish government destructive to their unalienable rights, or with its possible greater meaning through understanding one another in; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Congress shall see that nothing abridges freedom of the press in its service to the unity of the people; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances or defense of this constitution.

I know that ugly covert group of agents is waiting to pounce on you for agreeing and accepting this obvious purpose of free speech. Ignore them, everyone should. We are separate and free from their masters.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

sir, that WAS the purpose of our Constitution.

That does not answer the question. It imposes circularity. It is ambiguous. It is evasion.

I will ask again in case you are confused.

What did the framers intend to serve the purpose of adequately uniting the people to have the power to alter or abolish government powerful enough to be destructive to unalienable rights IF free speech was not intended to serve that purpose?

So is it confusion? Is it stupidity? No, not either.

HVAC's behavior and all those asked this question indicates they are making a pretense of constitutional defense. They are not here to participate in constitutional defense. They are here to prevent focus on functional strategy, effort, unity upon doing so.

They pretend that repetitive indulgence upon the sensationalist aspects of government destructive to unalienable rights is defense if the constitution and rights.

It's true people need to know there is a threat to the constitution, but at a point, another agents posts hopelessness upon resorting government under the constitution then al but one or two wholeheartedly agree and recommend arming against it.

Pure manipulation.

 

[acptulsa]

The constitution did not enable unity.

Of course it did.

Without the Constitution, this land mass was nothing but gaggle of colonies founded by the British and unable to stand against British wrath. Even the Articles of Confederation and a war just won failed to accomplish that.

Do you listen to questions before you blather your prepackaged response, and revert to blindly and loudly selling your One True Path to Liberty (TM)?

 

[Ronin Truth]

Thanks, but I already know a couple of pretty good ways to get to Liberty, MO.

HINT: www.mapquest.com

 

[acptulsa]

Thanks, but I already know a couple of pretty good ways to get to Liberty, MO.

HINT: www.mapquest.com

Congratulations.

Now comes the hard part. You have to come up with a good reason to go.

 

[Origanalist]

Congratulations.

Now comes the hard part. You have to come up with a good reason to go.

Here ya go. https://www.municode.com/library/mo/liberty/codes/code_of_ordinances