OLD THREAD FROM MARCH:Two officers believed shot near Pentagon

Guy had one idea I like:
Mr. Bedell's ambitions went beyond seeing marijuana legalized. On his Wikipedia user page, he wrote of his hopes of seeing "billions and billions of carefully cultivated, highly valuable cannibis plants growing through the United States with complete security of property." He envisioned the plants being used as a part of a new monetary system tied to the value of a gram of cannabis.

From:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100....html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsSecond
 
sooner the better in my opinion. The longer we wait, the worse it will be. Every year that goes buy the police get more federalized, more draconian laws get passed, and more police grid gets up. Everyday that goes by makes it harder to survive what we all know is coming. We are waking people up, but not as fast as they are building a tyrannical grid.

Either wait 100 years till i'm long dead and gone, or get it over with now.

+1776
 
Stop right there.

What of the other (witness identified) people involved in OKC? The ones that weren't arrested?
The ones that masterminded?.
The ones that planted explosives inside the building?

That whole story is still being passed off as something like the truth and the name McVeigh is brought up constantly.
McVeigh Was a Government operative. Period.....

I more mean in the practical sense. McVeigh is enshrined as the symbol of right-wing extremism, thus why the comparisons are so rampant. Further acts like these will merely be thrown atop that pile, regardless of the truth.

And here it is . . . he tried to "self-medicate with marijuana" . . .

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35716821/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/

The only thing that's in mortal danger from a pothead is a bag of sun chips.
 
sounds like his parents sold him out, reporting him to the police and trying to get him put in a mental hospital
 
I just heard on the radio that the shooter had driven across country from California. That said it's way to early to know what to think about this. (*cough* MKULTRA *cough*)

Agreed, but I'm leaning towards what Mike Rivero wrote at WRH:

http://whatreallyhappened.com/

Given that the majority of people no longer trust the official story of 9-11 it seems likely that anyone reaching their breaking point and shooting at the Pentagon (or crashing a plane into the IRS) has already decided that the government should not be trusted on anything that it says.

The government and media are going to spin this latest attack as a condemnation of anyone who fails to believe as the government orders them to believe I think this only reminds all Americans that they are not alone in wondering just what really happened (cheap plug) on 9-11.

I know that some people will insist this is a staged false-flag event, but like Joe Stack who crashed a plane into the IRS, this reads to me like a genuine case of an American who has just had enough, has reached their breaking point, and a government propaganda machine doing their usual "how can we use this to our advantage?" process.

The reason I do not think this is a false flag attack is that s6aged false flag terror is directed at innocent lives, lots of them, to maximize the psychological shock value. In both the IRS and Pentagon cases, public opinion has little sympathy for the targets.

False flag attacks have to have a live perpetrator, someone to put on trial, like Tim McVeigh, or even better to remain at large, like Osama bin Laden, to continue to fan the flames of public outrage and build public pressure to exact a revenge against the intended patsy. In both the IRS and Pentagon cases, the perpetrators are already dead, cutting off any possibility of revenge. Closure is forced on these events before then even get going.

Before the American revolution started in earnest it was preceded by numerous small actions in which angered colonials shot and killed British soldiers at random. The reason the British panicked at the intersection of Devonshire and State streets on March 5, 1770 was their awareness that the colonials had been shooting and killing their comrades.

It appears we are in the same phase here.
 
Agreed, but I'm leaning towards what Mike Rivero wrote at WRH:

http://whatreallyhappened.com/

The reason I do not think this is a false flag attack is that s6aged false flag terror is directed at innocent lives, lots of them, to maximize the psychological shock value.

Hmmm, I dunno, I think this is mostly for the purposes of increasing legislation targeted at people like us. The IRS and Pentagon incidents have been presented to the public, but they don't seem to be pushing them as hard as they can because they aren't trying to convince the public of anything, they just need to have an excuse for congress to pass more laws. It's not the loss of life, it's the potential for the loss of lives that they will address congress with.

I'm not convinced this was staged, but I'd put the probability of it being staged pretty high.
 
I'm going to have to say this is sad. It's sad for lotsa reasons but more than anything its a cryin shame we cant get organized enough to throw 435 people out of office and get some real people in there to find out whats goin on, clean some shit up.

FYI folks, this guy was actually a registered Democrat, go figure.

All, we are puttin together somethin real special in LA with RestoreLA.us , please consider joinin the fight, got a bunch of real winners here that are gonna turn things around in a big way, voting regular people into office and taking it back.

Yippee Ki
 
The guy comes up on them . . . dressed as to not cause attention . . .
starts saying something, but gets two shots off that pretty much miss, very superficial.

Of course he's hit in the head . . .
as is the problem in these cases . . . the LEO can pretty much just say whatever they want now . . .
and after any video cameras at this entrance have been edited -
it will show enough for another Congress hollow resolution as a "terrorist".
 
Back
Top