OH - Haitian migrants eating cats?

[dannno]

No they didn't *have to* pass that law. They may have passed such a law. But it's pretty ridiculous. That's like saying the US *had to* pass a law against drinking raw milk. As long as they're not harming anyone else, it's none of the government's business what anybody eats.

Do you have a farm with chickens or cattle? Do you mind if immigrants steal your animals and eat them?

You TDS people are the most irrational people on the planet.. you sound like a bunch of leftists..

First you say "those weren't cats!"

Then you say "it's totally fine if they want to eat cats, I'm a libertarian blah blah blah"

Not even considering a lot of the cats they ate allegedly belonged to other people..

Your brain is broken. The media literally broke your brain.

 

[TheCount]

Do you have a farm with chickens or cattle? Do you mind if immigrants steal your animals and eat them?

Now they're eating cows???

 

[dannno]

This is a point in favor of letting them eat cats and geese that they have to catch on their own.

I think you forgot the part about giving them tens of thousands of tax dollars.

Your.
Brain.
Is.
Broken.

 

[dannno]

Now they're eating cows???

I'm sure they steal them "legally" from the store using our tax dollars.

 

[jmdrake]

That chicken is being held by somebody, not resting on the grill.. it looks nothing like what is on the grill, the body is round instead of elongated.

I've shown you pictures of dead skinned cats and pictures of skinned chickens with their feet still on them. Anyone with an IQ greater than 10 can tell which one looks more like whats on the grill.

 

[jmdrake]

Lol, dude.. that literally looks exactly like what is on the grill, with head and tail removed,

The cat picture looks NOTHING like what's on the grill.

 

[jmdrake]

This is not the way a Haitian skins a cat for cooking. Examples were shown in in earlier posts. (Though I think most of them have been removed at the source?)
This photo looks like a cat that's been prepared for dissection by a biology student. Schools purchase them in bulk. It's not the same.

LOL. Any made up excuse will do. [MENTION=10908]dannno[/MENTION] says that looks exactly like whats on the grill. You said it doesn't look like the way Haitans prepare cats for food. One or both of you is clearly wrong. You can't get your made up story straight.

 

[Invisible Man]

I think you forgot the part about giving them tens of thousands of tax dollars.

This whole thread you've been harping on them eating cats. Now you want to make it about tax dollars?

If it's about tax dollars, then, once again, that's a point in favor of letting them eat cats.

You're trying to have your cat and eat it too.

 

[Invisible Man]

Do you have a farm with chickens or cattle? Do you mind if immigrants steal your animals and eat them?

Theft is already illegal.

It was also already illegal in Chile.

The law in question had nothing to do with anybody stealing anything.

 

[jmdrake]

This whole thread you've been harping on them eating cats. Now you want to make it about tax dollars?

If it's about tax dollars, then, once again, that's a point in favor of letting them eat cats.

You're trying to have your cat and eat it too.

So much else to talk about and yet Trumpskiites seem insistent on trying to spin J.D. Vance's bvllshyt straw into gold. Now one says "The skinned cat picture looks exactly like whats on the grill" and the other says "It doesn't look like what's on the grill because that's not the way Haitians skin cats."

 

[PAF]

No they didn't *have to* pass that law. They may have passed such a law. But it's pretty ridiculous. That's like saying the US *had to* pass a law against drinking raw milk. As long as they're not harming anyone else, it's none of the government's business what anybody eats.

+ REP

Do you have a farm with chickens or cattle? Do you mind if immigrants steal your animals and eat them?

You TDS people are the most irrational people on the planet.. you sound like a bunch of leftists..

First you say "those weren't cats!"

Then you say "it's totally fine if they want to eat cats, I'm a libertarian blah blah blah"

Not even considering a lot of the cats they ate allegedly belonged to other people..

Your brain is broken. The media literally broke your brain.

If anybody, from this country or other, comes on to your private property and takes or EATS anything from your private property, there are already laws for that. It is called theft.

I don't need or want any additional laws which permit or deny what animals I am allowed to eat or drink on my own property. You TDS people are the most irrational people on the planet.. you want a law for everything.. you sound like a bunch of leftists. Oh wait. You are a bunch leftists.

 

[Occam's Banana]

So much else to talk about and yet [...]

... and yet you have made 140 posts about it so far - which is almost 3 times as many as dannno (51), over 30 posts more than anyone else (AF @ 106), and nearly 1/5th (20%) of the entire thread.

 

[jmdrake]

... and yet you have made 140 posts about it so far - which is almost 3 times as many as dannno (51), over 30 posts more than anyone else (AF @ 106), and nearly 1/5th (20%) of the entire thread.

Probably because I've been the main person pushing back against the obvious bvllshyt. It's a tough job but somebody should do it.

Edit: And it's funny that the same debunked lies get regurgitated in the same thread as if they haven't already been debunked.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Probably because I've been the main person pushing back against the obvious bvllshyt. It's a tough job but somebody should do it.

Sure. That's fine. That's what places like RPFs are for, so post away.

But it's more than a little strange (not to mention hypocritical) to be the most prolific poster on a subject - by a large margin - while simultaneously complaining about how "insistent" other people are being when there is "so much else to talk about".

 

[jmdrake]

Sure. That's fine. That's what places like RPFs are for, so post away.

But it's more than a little strange (not to mention hypocritical) to be the most prolific poster on a subject - by a large margin - while simultaneously complaining about how "insistent" other people are being when there is "so much else to talk about".

You are free to your opinion. I happen to disagree with it. Someone can simultaneously be exasperated about something and still respond to it. For example I have through the years defendant Ron Paul against charges of racism because of the newsletters while at the same time wishing people would quit bringing them up. Was I wrong on that? I dont think so. You are free to disagree with me though.

 

[Valli6]

LOL. Any made up excuse will do. [MENTION=10908]dannno[/MENTION] says that looks exactly like whats on the grill. You said it doesn't look like the way Haitans prepare cats for food. One or both of you is clearly wrong. You can't get your made up story straight.

You posted a picture of a dead cat that still had the fur left on it's head, face and paws. it looked like a specimen intended for dissection, not cooking. Earlier in the thread there were several videos/photos of hatians preparing dead cats they intended to eat - did you see them? I'm not making it up. They removed all the fur. In that respect, they were different from the picture you posted.

 

[jmdrake]

The truth that is in your face that you are lying about is the fact that you put up a video as "proof" that was already debunked by [MENTION=58229]TheCount[/MENTION] as a fvcking white man in Springfield Florida who was eating the cat and when I called you out on your BS you slithered away like a snake only to come back to try to back up [MENTION=10908]dannno[/MENTION] on his bvllshyt about an unnamed chicken farmer and surgeon. You were also shown to be full of shyt with your "New American" article that relied on a Twitter post of a supposed court document that didn't have a header page so nobody can indepedently verify if the case even exists. Even sealed cases can at least be looked up with their case number even if you can't go into the case and read the document.

You're so full of shyt! The chicken farmer IS NOT NAMED! The "surgeon" is not named! More heresay bullshyt that would never hold up in court.

Edit: Hell. I'll go a step further and show you why you're full of shyt. From the article I posted.

[video]Rufo did not respond to a request for comment on Saturday. The Vance campaign declined to comment on the record. An expert at the National Chicken Council did not reply to inquiries. However, a source close to Vance told The Independent that they do not believe the carcasses seen on the grill are chickens. A visual comparison of skinned cats prepared for laboratory use and whole-plucked chickens suggested the animals in the video are almost certainly not feline.[/video]

So let's compare a photo of what JD Vance was saying was a cat being grilled with the photo of a cat skinned for disection.

verses:

The JD Vance "cat" looks more like chicken than actual skinned cat.

And note that the claws in the JD Vance "cat" are pointing exactly the same way as actual chicken claws. So your anonymous "expert" was full of shyt.

That's nice. Fauci was all over the map. So was Trump. Also from Fox News:

https://www.foxnews.com/world/8000-chinese-nationals-came-into-us-after-trump-travel-ban-coronavirus

Trump’s initial travel ban included any non-U.S. travelers coming from China, and excluded anyone coming from Hong Kong or Macau in late January.
​

So...what good is a China travel ban when Hong Kong is part of China?

Back to the subject at hand, more proof that J.D. Vance's "grilled cat" video is actually chicken.

Actuall cat meat from China.

The stupid video JD Vance posted:

Chicken that still have their feet on them.

This video shows a farmer cutting the feet off of the a chicken at 9:00 in.



Here are the parts of a chicken.

In the J.D. Vance chicken (what you falsely cal cat) grilling video you can clearly see the "shank" at the end of the chicken legs which gets notibly skinnier than the hock / thigh part of the chicken. Note you can also see the rear facing "claw" just like on the chicken image. Note you never see four legs on any of the chickens in the J.D. Vance chicken grill video. You do see something that looks like a chicken wing on one of them. Also the legs are sticking straight up just like in the farmer prepping a chicken video which is different from how the cats are in the cat disecction image I gave you as well as the cat meat image. And note that tails are suspiciously missing on the JD Vance chicken transcats. Did they have bottom surgery? Sure, manx cats don't have tails (they do have a little tail nub) but those cats aren't that common.

You posted a picture of a dead cat that still had the fur left on it's head, face and paws. it looked like a specimen intended for dissection, not cooking. Earlier in the thread there were several videos/photos of hatians preparing dead cats they intended to eat - did you see them? I'm not making it up. They removed all the fur. In that respect, they were different from the picture you posted.

I also posted photos of cats prepped for food. I've requotted them some of them for your convenience. They don't look like what was on the JD Vance grill.

 

[Occam's Banana]

You are free to your opinion. I happen to disagree with it. Someone can simultaneously be exasperated about something and still respond to it. For example I have through the years defendant Ron Paul against charges of racism because of the newsletters while at the same time wishing people would quit bringing them up. Was I wrong on that? I dont think so. You are free to disagree with me though.

No one said or implied that you are "wrong" to respond to something.

But when you post significantly more (and more often) about something than anyone else does, and then also complain that others are posting too much about that something (instead of something else), then you are being hypocritical - regardless of how "right" you might be about that something.

 

[jmdrake]

No one said or implied that you are "wrong" to respond to something.

But when you post significantly more (and more often) about something than anyone else does, and then also complain that others are posting too much about that something (instead of something else), then you are being hypocritical - regardless of how "right" you might be about that something.

Again I disagree and I explained my disagreement and you refused to acknowledge my explaination so I'll agree to disagree with you. But I will reiterate it. It's not at all hypocritical to respond to misinformation and at the same time complain about the volumn of misinformation you have to respond to. Again I give you the example of the the claims of Ron Paul being racist.

 

[Occam's Banana]

It's not at all hypocritical to respond to misinformation and at the same time complain about the volumn of misinformation you have to respond to.

It is when the volume of one's responses so greatly exceeds the volume of that to which one is responding (especially when the bulk of those responses are merely repetitions of previous responses).