OH - Haitian migrants eating cats?

My only point is that Springfield had a noticeably large feral cat problem years ago, now they are all gone.. ever since the Haitians came.


I see no possible way to construe this as anything other than a positive reason to welcome the Haitians and thank them for helping to solve this problem.
 
Last edited:
In this thread: Trumpkins literally cannot admit that their orange savior has ever been wrong about anything.

Or even Vance, all of the sudden. Six months ago none of them gave a damn what he said, or even knew who he was.
 
Here's something interesting I just learned.

It wasn't illegal to eat cat and dog meat in the US until 2018, when Trump signed a law banning it.
https://www.wrdw.com/content/news/P...t-Illegal-in-the-United-States-503308841.html

I don't know if that was discussed here at the time, but I totally missed it when it happened. Just another example of Trump's tyrannical ways.

Now I'm beginning to understand why the Trumper's are so inexplicably up in arms about this. They're not just incentivized to support their leader's dumb remarks, they also are incentivized to defend his dumb law.

Also, as a point of order, this whole thread should be in the Freedom Living forum.
 
Last edited:
Or even Vance, all of the sudden. Six months ago none of them gave a damn what he said, or even knew who he was.
He has been Chosen and will remain anointed and above fault until one day he is inevitably cast aside by the great orange one.

See also: The horrid mess that was Trump's entire cabinet.
 
It wasn't illegal to eat cat meat in the US until 2018, when Trump signed a law banning it.
https://www.wrdw.com/content/news/P...t-Illegal-in-the-United-States-503308841.html

I don't know if that was discusser here at the time, but I totally missed it when it happened. Just another example of Trump's tyrannical ways.

Now I'm beginning to understand why the Trumper's are so inexplicably up in arms about this. They're not just incentivized to support their leader's dumb remarks, they also are incentivized to defend his dumb law.

..
 
Last edited:
Your post has nothing to do with Springfield, Ohio or even whether cats/dogs/ducks/geese were stolen/eaten.
It's all about:

1.) your sense that people are proven to be racist when they acknowledge how problems have been increased by the unanticipated influx of a particular imported group of people - and all you are willing to recognize about those people is their skin tone - nothing else! - as if that's the only thing that matters about them. (Isn't that kind of racist?) It's not accurate to assume everyone thinks like that!

2.) your belief that anyone who thinks that citizens of Springfield are being cruelly wronged, can only believe that Trump is a god who is always right and will solve all problems.

Trump isn't God. He's very flawed. He’ll merely cause a lot less damage than the alternative.
That's all.
---
Proverbs 26:4-5
4 Do not answer a fool according to his folly,
or you yourself will be just like him.
5 Answer a fool according to his folly,
or he will be wise in his own eyes.


And this point you and [MENTION=10908]dannno[/MENTION] have contradicted your own stupid selves. And you've been caught in a falsehood about the cat pictures I posted. You're running around i circles like cultists.

And [MENTION=28167]Occam's Banana[/MENTION], consider this. If Trump had not skipped the primary debate and if all of the others had decided to gang up on him and all talk about Stormy Daniels twice each and Trump responded each time then finally said "Can we quit talking about Stormy Daniels" and the moderator said "But you've mentioned Stormy Daniels more times than anybody" what would you say to that? I know what I would say. You can't just look at the number of times someone mentions something but you have to look at the number of initiations of a subject verses the number of responses. That is if you want to have an honest analysis. I don't spend that much time responding to [MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION]'s "taking things from white people" thread because even though I think it's slanted, at least in general it's based on actual facts, and when I can debunk something he'll be honest about it and not try to claim a chicken on a grill looks like a cat and then when I post a picture of a cat say "But that's not what a Haitian skinned cat looks like" and then when I post a picture of a cat prepared for food come up with some other lie to try to pretend facts aren't facts. And people wonder why black folks don't stick with the GOP. :rolleyes: I remember Tony Brown joining the GOP way back in the day then leaving it because of all of the blatant racism he ran into even though he kept the same political positions. Even Candace Owens recently admitted on Twitter that she was encouraged to attack her own people.
 
And people wonder why black folks don't stick with the GOP. :rolleyes: I remember Tony Brown joining the GOP way back in the day then leaving it because of all of the blatant racism he ran into even though he kept the same political positions. Even Candace Owens recently admitted on Twitter that she was encouraged to attack her own people.
A silly data point means what exactly? The absurd notion that racism is a problem in the republican party. Victimhood is for the weak
 
Trump isn't God. He's very flawed. He’ll merely cause a lot less damage than the alternative.
That's all.
---


Flawed? No. It is by design.

Less damage??? Then, explain to me how "Bait and Switch", which leads to the same expanse of government growth/control, is "less damaging" than the "alternative" who is up front and open about it.
 
Flawed? No. It is by design.

Less damage??? Then, explain to me how "Bait and Switch", which leads to the same expanse of government growth/control, is "less damaging" than the "alternative" who is up front and open about it.
Because to me [at least], "Bait and Switch" is far more devious and destructive because the people have been hood-winked.
 
Your post has nothing to do with Springfield, Ohio or even whether cats/dogs/ducks/geese were stolen/eaten.
It's all about:

(Nonsense drivel by a Trumpkin who can't stand that he got busted)
---

Welcome to the ignore list along with [MENTION=73146]tebowlives[/MENTION].
 
I see no possible way to construe this as anything other than a positive reason to welcome the Haitians and thank them for helping to solve this problem.

As long as you admit they are eating the cats, each person in the community can decide what they think about that, if that's how they want to solve the problem, and if all the other problems in the community (including their personal pets being eaten) are worth such a solution.
 
Last edited:
As long as you admit they are eating the cats, each person in the community can decide what they think about that, if that's how they want to solve the problem, and if all the other problems in the community are worth such a solution.

I don't see any need for me to admit that at all. My point applies whether they're eating them or not. But if they are, then good. It's a win-win.

Trumpers are so caught up in criticizing this that they haven't even taken a step back to ask themselves what's even wrong with it if it's true.
 
I don't see any need for me to admit that at all. My point applies whether they're eating them or not. But if they are, then good. It's a win-win.

Trumpers are so caught up in criticizing this that they haven't even taken a step back to ask themselves what's even wrong with it if it's true.

LOL, that was my point. YOU don't have a problem with them eating strays. Other people might. I don't have a huge problem with it personally.

I edited my post right when you posted this.. one of the problems being that they are eating their pets, not just the strays. That was the primary complaint. Evidence of such being that they "fixed" the problem of stray cats by eating the strays, then once those were gone they turned to people's pets.

The other problems are all the other problems happening in the community.. is it worth them being there because they fixed a stray cat problem when there are so many other problems happening there? I highly doubt a single person would say well, it's good they are here eating our stray cats and driving up housing costs and flipping over cars and killing people because man, that stray cat problem really sucked.

You seem to be completely missing the point.
 
LOL, that was my point. YOU don't have a problem with them eating strays. Other people might.

Those other people need to learn to mind their own business.

Trumpers calling 911 because they saw someone eating something they think is gross are just as bad as people who called Walz's tip line on their neighbors for not social distancing during COVID.
 
one of the problems being that they are eating their pets, not just the strays. That was the primary complaint.

Then quit talking about all this other nonsense that doesn't even in the slightest bit reflect poorly on the Haitian immigrants and focus on that.

The whole point of the Trumpers bringing up all this other stuff is so that they can play these games where they can show evidence of somebody eating a goose and claim that counts as evidence of somebody else stealing their neighbors pet.

And also, when you're doing that, keep in mind that each case only pertains to the actual individuals involved in that case, and nobody else. If you actually find a solid example of somebody who stole somebody's pet, and the thief was a Haitian, then that counts as one Haitian stealing a pet, not "the Haitians" stealing pets.
 
Last edited:
I don't see any need for me to admit that at all. My point applies whether they're eating them or not. But if they are, then good. It's a win-win.

Trumpers are so caught up in criticizing this that they haven't even taken a step back to ask themselves what's even wrong with it if it's true.

Yeah, it's just "Trumpers". :rolleyes:

Do they not have pets on the planet you come from? Clearly you have not lived in the US (or Canada).

 
Back
Top