OH - Haitian migrants eating cats?

[Swordsmyth]

I'm willing to bet that Mexico would issue some sort of document to these people to help make their problem our problem.

You don't have to bet, they do it constantly.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Did gangs take over apartment complexes in Colorado? Is it still a problem? Why is that not the discussion?

It is, and Trump is going there to highlight it.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Because verfifed stories that can bring people together aren't as fun as unverified stories that pull people apart.

It is verified, and the reason it's not "Officially verified" is because the officials are in on it. (intelligent people know that in times like ours official denials are confessions)

The mayor of Springfield, Ohio is making millions by replacing a third of the population of his town with Haitian immigrants

https://x.com/718Tv/status/1835831012644810864

 

[Swordsmyth]

So they don't want a bunch of gringos coming down there and $#@!ing the joint up...imagine that?

And that's why we must use them as a dumping ground when we expel the unamericans foreign and domestic, they've earned it.

 

[Swordsmyth]

It is verified, and the reason it's not "Officially verified" is because the officials are in on it. (intelligent people know that in times like ours official denials are confessions)

The mayor of Springfield, Ohio is making millions by replacing a third of the population of his town with Haitian immigrants

https://x.com/718Tv/status/1835831012644810864

Any questions?

The “Republican” Springfield Mayor who doesn’t want Trump visiting his city is a Democrat donor. pic.twitter.com/l4SNfLtXBJ — Natalie Winters (@nataliegwinters) September 19, 2024

https://twitter.com/nataliegwinters/status/1836757460754846205

Makes you wonder about lots of other people.

 

[jmdrake]

Any questions?

The “Republican” Springfield Mayor who doesn’t want Trump visiting his city is a Democrat donor. pic.twitter.com/l4SNfLtXBJ — Natalie Winters (@nataliegwinters) September 19, 2024

https://twitter.com/nataliegwinters/status/1836757460754846205

Makes you wonder about lots of other people.

Any intelligent person knows that you don't get on national TV and push a video that's already been debunked as your "proof" whether you are right or not. As I talked about in [MENTION=40029]PAF[/MENTION]'s recent thread, had Trump and Vance talked about the money, as you are doing now, they would have been on solid ground. Go with the things you can absolutely prove. But I get it. You're unwilling to admit that anyone on team Trump ever makes a mistake.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Any intelligent person knows that you don't get on national TV and push a video that's already been debunked as your "proof" whether you are right or not. As I talked about in @PAF's recent thread, had Trump and Vance talked about the money, as you are doing now, they would have been on solid ground. Go with the things you can absolutely prove. But I get it. You're unwilling to admit that anyone on team Trump ever makes a mistake.

LOL
I've said Vance may have made a mistake by citing a particular case, you won't admit all the other cases that are real and you cling to the official denials by the liars who are importing the pet stealers and eaters.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Reports of shoplifting and vehicle theft increased considerably in Springfield, Ohio, following the arrival of thousands of Haitian refugees, according to data obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation through a records request.

https://dailycaller.com/2024/09/16/...ants-poured-into-ohio-town-police-data-shows/


But trust us, they'd NEVER steal people's pets to eat, NEVER NEVER NEVER!

 

[A. Havnes]

Whoever told her that is a liar.
Invaders do not have any rights, let alone a 2A right to be armed.

Open treason is not a good look.

I’m going to have to disagree here. The right to bear arms is considered a natural right. It’s not a privilege granted by any government, it’s inalienable and only brought up in the bill of rights for the same reason as all the others: to demonstrate that our government recognizes that and was formed not to regulate these natural rights but to safeguard them. They aren’t American rights.

 

[Swordsmyth]

I’m going to have to disagree here. The right to bear arms is considered a natural right. It’s not a privilege granted by any government, it’s inalienable and only brought up in the bill of rights for the same reason as all the others: to demonstrate that our government recognizes that and was formed not to regulate these natural rights but to safeguard them. They aren’t American rights.

Invaders have no rights here.
They have them in their homecountries, but not here.

And I can remember when the pro-invader people argued it wasn't an invasion because they weren't armed. (even though that doesn't make it not an invasion and many were armed)

 

[acptulsa]

Are you getting all your politics from cartoons now?

 

[Swordsmyth]

Are you getting all your politics from cartoons now?

It would be an improvement over where you get yours if he was.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Invaders have no rights here.

That is a pretty bold statement.

If an "invader" has no rights, why are asylum laws on the books?

 

[acptulsa]

It would be an improvement over where you get yours if he was.

Why don't you just tell the world where I do get my politics? That way I can look it up and post all the differences between that and where I stand, exposing your delusional condition for all to see.

That is a pretty bold statement.

If an "invader" has no rights, why are asylum laws on the books?

A real American also considers it heresy against God.

Like Coolidge said, if all men are endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights, that's final.

 

[Swordsmyth]

That is a pretty bold statement.

If an "invader" has no rights, why are asylum laws on the books?

Because we can choose to grant them privileges.
Just as we can choose to show mercy and deport them instead of shooting them.

 

[acptulsa]

Because we can choose to grant them privileges.
Just as we can choose to show mercy and deport them instead of shooting them.

Let's try this again, alleged Christian.

Which part of "all" and "unalienable" mean the opposite of what everyone thinks they mean?

You figure shooting them is just as justified as deporting them, do you? "Thou shalt not kill" doesn't apply if someone steps over an imaginary line in the sand? How do you square that with, "Give unto Caesar what is of Caesar, and give unto God what is of God"? Because that imaginary line is of Caesar, not God. You can see that, right?

 

[Swordsmyth]

Let's try this again, alleged Christian.

Which part of "all" and "unalienable" mean the opposite of what everyone thinks they mean?

You figure shooting them is just as justified as deporting them, do you? "Thou shalt not kill" doesn't apply if someone steps over an imaginary line in the sand? How do you square that with, "Give unto Caesar what is of Caesar, and give unto God what is of God"? Because that imaginary line is of Caesar, not God. You can see that, right?

You need to read the Bible, it's full of GOD aiding people to kill invaders to drive them from their lands.

It also says this:
[h=1]John 10:1[/h] “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.”

 

[TheCount]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitian_Revolution

Maybe you should read the things that you quote.

Dessalines had specifically stated that France is "the real enemy of the new nation." This allowed certain categories of whites to be excluded from massacre who had to pledge their rejection to France: the Polish soldiers who deserted from the French army; the group of German colonists of Nord-Ouest who were inhabitants before the revolution; French widows who were allowed to keep their property;[134] select male Frenchmen;[138] and a group of medical doctors and professionals.

First they just killed every white they could, including anti-slavery allies, then when the extermination was all but complete some of the survivors were spared on a subjective basis

National and political loyalties being a subjective basis according to what you said in this post.

You realize that this is exactly my point, right? That whatever you think of the Haitian's actions, yours are the no different.

If Haitians are stupid and evil, then you are stupid and evil.


Well, at least you and I agree on something.

 

[acptulsa]

You need to read the Bible...

You keep making ASSumptions thinking you're making an ass out of me with them. But you only make an aSS out of yourself -- over and over.

...it's full of GOD aiding people to kill invaders to drive them from their lands.

God is the Potter. He has that right.

You don't.

Read your own Bible. Start with the first three Commandments. Show me where God issued you written orders to kill people.

It also says this:
[h=1]John 10:1[/h] “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.”

Yet you figure you can get to heaven by ignoring Jesus (except to occasionally twist His words to suit your purpose) and listening to zerohedge instead.

All right. Let's ignore the plain fact that He was making an analogy and take it at face value. Where does Jesus say it's hunky dory to be the one to escalate thievery to killing? Are you claiming Jesus not only didn't say turn the other cheek, but upped the bet on Hammurabi and said, a life for a tooth and a life for an eye?

 

[Swordsmyth]

Maybe you should read the things that you quote.

Maybe you should try not deceptively editing quotes.

It said this:

The 1804 massacre was carried out against the remaining white population of French colonists[SUP][130][/SUP] and loyalists,[SUP][131][/SUP] both enemies and traitors of the revolution,

All French were slaughtered no matter what side they took or if they didn't take a side.
And other whites got killed at the same time.

By the end of April 1804, some 3,000 to 5,000 people had been killed[SUP][137][/SUP] practically eradicating the country's white population.

National and political loyalties being a subjective basis according to what you said in this post.

You realize that this is exactly my point, right? That whatever you think of the Haitian's actions, yours are the no different.

If Haitians are stupid and evil, then you are stupid and evil.


Well, at least you and I agree on something.

Those spared were not spared because of national or political loyalties, which are not subjective, people were killed regardless of them until it was decided to subjectively spare some and pretend it had to do with that.

What I am proposing is not the wholesale slaughter of the invaders or the domestic traitors, I am proposing they be evicted alive.
The Haitians wantonly murdered and enslaved the whites.
There was a reason many were reluctant to participate and the fanatics had to force them to.

You can try to twist things all you want, but everyone can see it's a lie.