Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 117,653
Sure it can.
You just don't have legal justification to use deadly force anymore.
You just don't have legal justification to use deadly force anymore.
Wait a minute, it's illegal to follow someone you think is suspicious because the police tell you it's "unnecessary"? I'm not buying that on several levels.
And if Zimmerman's account of the incident is true, why doesn't he have the right to meet deadly force with deadly force? Of course, my belief is that ANY physical assault can justifiably be met with lethal self-defense, but even if you believe the response should be proportional, are you telling me that getting punched in the face and then having your head repeatedly slammed into the pavement isn't a potentially lethal attack? When people have their head slammed into the pavement, they can suffer serious concussions and even death. In the realm of hand-to-hand combat, that's the most serious kind of attack short of trying to snap someone's neck or something. And if someone is already punching you in the face and slamming your head in the pavement, what would make you presume they weren't going to continue the attack? The idea that Travyon Martin's assault (if Zimmerman's account is true) isn't ALSO lethal is RIDICULOUS -- of course it was! If you get your head slammed into pavement hard enough you have a decent chance of dying, just as you do if someone shoots you in the torso.
Another thing that is RIDICULOUS about this case -- that the "stand your ground" law is getting drawn into criticism here. Because again, if Zimmerman's account is true, he was PINNED TO THE GROUND getting beaten up, so the issue of the Stand Your Ground law absolving him of a "duty to retreat" is totally irrelevant because retreat was not an option! The only relevance is in his initial confronting of Travyon, but there's nothing illegal about confronting someone in a public space!