Official Thread: 2024 Vote Fraud

My offspring and classmates were given those too, along with a sample ballot several years back. When Ron Paul was "written in" the teacher got angry because Mitt Romney wasn't selected and my offspring was told to do it over again.

So, I marched down to the school and had it out with "teacher", to which I was called a "trouble-maker" for not setting the proper example of "party unity". Boy did that teacher regret me going down to that school.

By the time my offspring graduated, ballots didn't mean a thing anymore lol :up:


Teach them young and teach them early! Turn out that vote!!!
 
I'm looking forward to some really good cheating this election season

michael-jackson-eating-popcorn.gif
 
Yeah, how about that?

But, just to make sure... Trump and Kamala BOTH know not to tamper with the FED, IRS, elimination of any of the 3 letter agencies, etc... right? I just want to make sure that my vote really, really counts.
 
Per the thread topic, it doesn't.

HTH

oxymoron /ŏk″sē-môr′ŏn″/
noun
A rhetorical figure in which incongruous or contradictory terms are combined, as in a deafening silence and a mournful optimist.


But, just to make sure... Trump and Kamala BOTH know not to tamper with the FED, IRS, elimination of any of the 3 letter agencies, etc... right? I just want to make sure that my vote really, really counts.

HTH
 
oxymoron /ŏk″sē-môr′ŏn″/
noun
A rhetorical figure in which incongruous or contradictory terms are combined, as in a deafening silence and a mournful optimist.

HTH

Asking for reassurances - even ironically or sarcastically - that your vote "really, really counts" from someone who started a thread about anticipated/expected "vote fraud" isn't oxymoronic - it's superfluous.
 
Asking for reassurances - even ironically or sarcastically - that your vote "really, really counts" from someone who started a thread about anticipated/expected "vote fraud" isn't oxymoronic - it's superfluous.

As superfluous as is the OP. I see no evidence of voter fraud in the pic that he provided. Other than the yellow highlight, it is not filled out, nor was it submitted, at least as far as I know. What I do know is, based on the text in that tweet, a teacher handed this page to a 16 year old student and asked that it be returned. Voter fraud? An assignment, perhaps?

Superfluous. The thread title along with the body "A thread and repository" would have sufficed, along with any material/data that would suggest voter fraud, or an attempt, had occurred. I can print the same thing out, highlight it in yellow, and post it here too. It doesn't mean anything, certainly not when left blank.
 
As superfluous as is the OP. I see no evidence of voter fraud in the pic that he provided. Other than the yellow highlight, it is not filled out, nor was it submitted, at least as far as I know. What I do know is, based on the text in that tweet, a teacher handed this page to a 16 year old student and asked that it be returned. Voter fraud? An assignment, perhaps?

Superfluous. The thread title along with the body "A thread and repository" would have sufficed, along with any material/data that would suggest voter fraud, or an attempt, had occurred. I can print the same thing out, highlight it in yellow, and post it here too. It doesn't mean anything, certainly not when left blank.

*sigh* Sure. Okay.

But what does any of that have to do with the pointlessness of asking someone (AF, in this case) who presumably does see or suspect it as evidence of "vote fraud" whether your vote will "really, really count" under such presumed circumstances? The whole point of "vote fraud" (merely suspected or actually real) is to discount votes.
 
Last edited:
*sigh* Sure. Okay.

But what does any of that have to do with the pointlessness of asking someone (AF, in this case) who presumably does see or suspect it as evidence of "vote fraud" whether your vote will "really, really count" under such presumed circumstances?

I don't know, just popping off I guess. I tend to do that sometimes :sorrow:

I guess when I read such things, all of the information and data that I have accumulated in my mind always goes back to the fundamental. How can any election be fraud-free when the folks at the top commit such "fraud" [using the term loosely] at the RNC, DNC, State Level, Courts... but then I'm supposed to worry about an unfilled page that was probably, though not proven, to be an assignment for school.

I get that people want their votes to count and they should work any/all angles to ensure that it is honest. But, typically in the meantime and going forward, everything else is brushed to the side and ignored [such as what I outlined in the above paragraph], which in my mind doesn't make a bit of sense.

So, my question that you initially pointed out to me was kind of like, ok, so individual voter ballot fraud does exists, now what? And what choices do we really have?

But, I digress, you are correct, I should be worrying about other things that I should be worrying about ;-)
 
Maybe the Florida election police will catch 21 this time instead of the 20 they did in 2020. Voter fraud is a made up issue.
 
Experts project that anywhere between 1.5 million and 2.7 million illegal alien invaders are likely to vote in the 2024 elections.
The Biden regime has flooded the country with millions of illegal aliens thanks to it, porous border, security, and interior enforcement policies
.“A 2014 academic journal found that 6.4% of noncitizens voted in 2008,” Kerri Toloczko, executive director of Election Integrity Network and senior advisor to the Only Citizens Vote Coalition, said to the conservative media outlet The Washington Stand. “There are about 24 million noncitizens in the U.S. right now. If they voted only at the same rate of 6.4% this year as they did in 2008, they would account for 1.5 million votes.”
Because of lax border security measures and sketchy election integrity laws in certain states, more illegal aliens could be expected to vote in this election cycle


“Based on the increased noncitizen activity at state DMVs, and the work of left-wing voter registration activists, this 6.4% could be much higher than it was in 2008. We could be looking at over two million unlawful noncitizen votes,” she continued.
Back in June, the United States House of Representatives published a 22-page report highlighting illegal aliens voting in the US. Currently, 17 cities in California, Maryland, and Vermont in addition to the District of Columbia let non-citizens vote in elections. Although non-citizens are only supposed to vote in local elections, several irregularities have been reported.
Toloczko called attention to cases of foreigners on lawfully voting in American elections. “The federal government recently indicted a group of noncitizens from 15 different countries on federal voting charges. Texas recently purged 6,500 noncitizens from its voter rolls — 30% of whom had voting records,” Toloczko said.

Illegal immigration in the United States has gotten completely out of hand. According to research by Yale University, roughly between 16 million to 29 million illegal aliens reside in the United States. Mind you, these are figures projected before Joe Biden was installed in office towards the end of January 2021. These numbers will have likely ballooned after the Biden regime decided to leave the mass migration floodgates open.


Passing strong election integrity laws is not enough. As long as immigrants — both legal and illegal — are allowed to enter the US at will, elections in the US will be forever rigged in favor of the Democrat Party — the anti-white party. Now more than ever, immigration restriction measures must be implemented.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/exper...-illegal-aliens-could-vote-in-2024-elections/
 
Illegal immigration in the United States has gotten completely out of hand. According to research by Yale University, roughly between 16 million to 29 million illegal aliens reside in the United States. Mind you, these are figures projected before Joe Biden was installed in office towards the end of January 2021. These numbers will have likely ballooned after the Biden regime decided to leave the mass migration floodgates open.

So they're using "scientific wild-assed guesses" from four years ago instead of trying to find out the real numbers. And then throwing in the old, and if a bigger percentage than usual vote, well...

Fearmongering. What kind of fool looks for alternative civic information from a site called...?

 
Back
Top