Official Thread: 2020 Vote Fraud

https://x.com/BetteMidler/status/1792323638223352170
55R3S1z.png


https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-clinton-maintains-2016-election-160716779.html
l7mFukf.jpeg
Democrats be like "Clinton was exercising her free speech saying the 2016 election was stolen. As long as she doesn't actively try to overturn the election no crimes are being committed."
 
People who cry, kick and scream for others to rule over them. No matter the process, fair or not, is the outcome any different? Don't they deserve what they get?


http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...Hard-to-Find&p=7231209&viewfull=1#post7231209

YEA there’s a difference and no, people who voted legitimately do not deserve to watch an election be stolen. Does the other guy do it better? Who knows, but when elections are being stolen you can be sure that the illegitimate president is intent on destroying the rule of law.
 
YEA there’s a difference and no, people who voted legitimately do not deserve to watch an election be stolen.

Absolutely true.

Does the other guy do it better? Who knows, but when elections are being stolen you can be sure that the illegitimate president is intent on destroying the rule of law.

And what if they're both intent on that? Do you overthrow the Constitution just to install the other one, because he legit won the election? Is that a win for the public? It's not just an academic question. You're going to be offered that choice before this year is out.
 
YEA there’s a difference and no, people who voted legitimately do not deserve to watch an election be stolen. Does the other guy do it better? Who knows, but when elections are being stolen you can be sure that the illegitimate president is intent on destroying the rule of law.

How is there a difference "for others to rule over them", legitimate or not?

Oh, I see. People who want others to rule over them should have it done fairly & squarely.
 
Absolutely true.



And what if they're both intent on that? Do you overthrow the Constitution just to install the other one, because he legit won the election? Is that a win for the public? It's not just an academic question. You're going to be offered that choice before this year is out.

It's a legitimate question.

Short of people figuring out that the only solution is to shrug off fed/state, which they can certainly do...

I hate to even say this: but if some democrat [Biden, Kamilla, whoever] gets in, at least the base republicans will do everything that they can to raise havoc and oppose the socialist agenda. Under Trump, they will put big fat blinders on and give him a pass on everything, like they do every time a "republican" president holds office.
 
I hate to even say this: but if some democrat [Biden, Kamilla, whoever] gets in, at least the base republicans will do everything that they can to raise havoc and oppose the socialist agenda. Under Trump, they will put big fat blinders on and give him a pass on everything, like they do every time a "republican" president holds office.

Hard to argue with that.

The slight difference would be in the Supreme Court nominations. Instead of the next Marxist DEI nominee, we'd get a police state apologist instead. See? Most important election of our lifetimes!
 

Meanwhile in Texas:

Election fortification achievement unlocked.

File under "Elections, Most Secure Ever"

Texas Voting Machines UNMASK Voters
https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/texas-voting-machines-unmask-voters:1
{Actual Justice Warrior | 23 May 2024}

In this video I discuss a troubling report from Current Revolt that highlights a lawsuit against the Texas Secretary Of State about election security. According to the complaint many Texans detailed voting records are now accessible by the public with minimal effort due to a total failure in security at in person voting locations.

Sources:
 

Bette Midler hasn’t heard Hillary say 2016 was stolen from her because reporters agree with Hillary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50Ci3i0jHnM
{Jack Hunter | 21 May 2024}

Bette Midler recently asked “Can you imagine what would have happened if Hillary Clinton had claimed the election was stolen?”

Hillary has claimed this. Many times.

Why doesn’t Bette know? Because it would have to be reported. A BIG story.

It’s not a big story because reporters agree with Hillary.



Democrats don’t know Hillary Clinton is an election-denier. Just ask Bill Maher
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tc3VLmXKC4U
{Jack Hunter | 23 May 2024}

Democrats don't know that Hillary Clinton is an election denier because no one in mainstream media reports it.

Reporters AGREE with Hillary that the 2016 election was stolen from her. It's not news to them. So they don't bother to report.

So Dems are just kept in the dark.

Just ask Bill Maher.

 
Turns out mail-in-ballot fraud really does happen, after all. Whoodathunkit? They're even able to suss it out with fancy bells & whistles like "evidence", and everything - at least, when Republicans are the ones up to shenanigans, anyway. (Funny how that works, ain't it?)

Or maybe big-city Democrat machines really are just that squeaky-clean ... (LOL)

Massive Mail-In Voter Fraud Uncovered In New York.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uegOjHlqi8o
{Nate The Lawyer | 31 August 2024}

In a shocking turn of events, authorities have uncovered a voter fraud scheme that has rocked the 2023 Republican primary in Queens, NYC. Six campaign staffers, including the daughter of a former city council candidate, have been arrested and charged with illegally manipulating absentee ballots to sway the election results. This case raises serious concerns about the security of absentee voting and the integrity of our elections. How did they get away with it, and what does this mean for the future of mail-in voting? Join us as we dive into the details of this scandal and its implications for our democracy.

 
Back
Top