Official Thread: 2020 Vote Fraud

Meanwhile, in Pennsylvania ...

Some Voting Machines In Fayette Co. Not Accepting Ballots
https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2021/05/18/some-voting-machines-in-fayette-co-not-accepting-ballots/
KDKA-TV (18 May 2021)

SOUTH UNION TOWNSHIP, Pa. (KDKA) — Elections officials in Fayette County are working to solve a problem dealing with voting machines not accepting ballots.

Numerous voters have contacted KDKA, reporting that their Republican ballots were not accepted.

The Fayette County Bureau of Elections has confirmed that precincts across the county are having issues with machines not scanning bar codes on all ballots, for both Republicans and Democrats.

Hutchison Elementary School, the polling location for South Union Township’s 3rd voting district, was among those having issues on Tuesday morning.

Chris Varney, Judge of Elections says they were initially under the impression that it was a problem with all ballots, but then determined it was only a problem with Republican ballots.

Varney says he was unaware of which specific precincts were dealing with the same issue, but that this same issue was happening in numerous locations across Fayette County.

The solution provided by Fayette County officials was to collect ballots from voters and store them in the back of voting machines — but not to scan any of them to ensure the process was handled in a fair manner.

It’s unclear when the problem with scanning the ballots may be resolved.
 
Not sure why people are so enamored by the forensic audit in Arizona and possibly other states. It's clearly evident that the results of all of them will still show Biden won (or at the very least it would show Trump won one of the states) because enough forensic evidence was destroyed to make it look like he still came out on top. Even if the audits did show Trump won, it wouldn't change the current situation.
 
Last edited:
Anti Globalist said:
Not sure why people are so enamored by the forensic audit in Arizona and possibly other states. It's clearly evident that the results of all of them will still show Biden won (or at the very least it would show Trump won one of the states) because enough forensic evidence was destroyed to make it look like he still came out on top. Even if the audits did show Trump won, it wouldn't change the current situation.
Click to expand...

Maricopa audit is down to the last 8 boxes. If forensic evidence was destroyed it could lead to de-certification. Biden only won the state by 11k votes. There is word coming out that in Maricopa alone there are 200k missing ballots compared to what should have been the total tally. So, yes, it's possible someone went in and destroyed some of the ballots. We will know shortly. 9 other states have sent delegates to observe and learn more about the process being undertaken in Maricopa.
 
Well, this'll all be settled when the audit results are released at the end of 2021.
 
:tears::tears::tears:

U.S. condemns Russia's election crackdown as Putin's party wins big majority
https://www.axios.com/russia-electi...ent-a22847f9-415e-4d3b-bbe0-efc7eba2bc6c.html
Zachary Basu (20 September 2021)

The State Department condemned the Russian government's crackdown on opposition groups during this weekend's parliamentary elections, saying in a statement Monday that the vote "took place under conditions not conducive to free and fair proceedings."

[...]

Major gains by opposition groups were erased Monday after the electoral commission added millions of online votes, a delayed count that drew calls of foul play for its lack of transparency.

[...]
 
"YOUR WELCOME" with Michael Malice #182: Mark Hemingway
Mark Hemingway's new book “Rigged” covers the many tools put in place to secure the Democrats' preferred results in the 2020 presidential election. Were some the most egregious tactics illegal and hidden behind the scenes, or were these maneuvers legal and done right in front of the public eye? Join the two as they discuss what happened, and what can be done in the future to restore a balance to the voting process and election results.
https://odysee.com/@MichaelMalice:6/your-welcome-with-michael-malice-182:0
 
Last edited:
Election Fraud Fortification

https://twitter.com/MattBatzel/status/1481792574956490753
DNYXgR8.png
 
Occam's Banana said:
Republicans celebrate the overturning of a Republican-passed vote-by-mail law.

Democrats celebrate that the same Republican-passed vote-by-mail law is likely to be upheld on appeal.

You just can't make this shit up ... :tears::tears::tears:

Court throws Pennsylvania’s mail-in voting law into doubt
https://apnews.com/article/pennsylv...ump-tom-wolf-31b4e7d0b16a996c63079c8aa3c3b121
Marc Levy (28 January 2022)

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A court declared Friday that Pennsylvania’s expansive 2-year-old mail-in voting law violates the state constitution, agreeing with challenges by Republicans who soured on the practice after former President Donald Trump began baselessly attacked it as rife with fraud in his 2020 reelection campaign.

Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration swiftly appealed to the state Supreme Court, immediately putting the party-line decision by a panel of three Republican and two Democratic judges on hold and stopping it from overturning the law.

Still, it throws Pennsylvania’s voting laws into doubt as the presidential battleground state’s voters prepare to elect a new governor and a new U.S. senator in 2022.

Just over 2.5 million people voted under the law’s expansion of mail-in voting in 2020′s presidential election, most of them Democrats, out of 6.9 million total cast.

Wolf’s office said its appeal means the lower court ruling has no immediate effect, and criticized Republicans as trying to kill the law “in the service of the ‘big lie’” of Trump’s baseless election fraud claims.

“We need leaders to support removing more barriers to voting, not trying to silence the people,” Wolf’s office said.

Trump and Republicans quickly lauded the decision.

“Big news out of Pennsylvania, great patriotic spirit is developing at a level that nobody thought possible. Make America Great Again!” Trump said in a statement through his political action committee.

The mail-in voting law has become a hot topic on the campaign trail, with nearly every Republican candidate for governor — including two of three state senators who voted for it — vowing to repeal it.

Even Republicans who avoid repeating Trump’s baseless election fraud claims have perpetuated the idea that Democrats cheated in the 2020 presidential election, routinely distorting the actions of state judges and officials as “unconstitutional” or “illegal” in settling legal disputes and questions over the mail-in voting law.

In Friday’s decision, the three Republican judges agreed with GOP challengers — including 11 lawmakers who actually voted for the law — and ruled that no-excuse mail-in voting is prohibited under the state constitution, until the constitution is changed to allow it.

The two Democrats on the panel dissented. The state Supreme Court — which will hear the appeal — has a 5-2 Democratic majority.

Pennsylvania’s attorney general, Josh Shapiro, a Democrat who is running for governor, said he is confident the state Supreme Court will uphold the mail-in voting law as constitutional.

He criticized the lower court’s opinion as “based on twisted logic and faulty reasoning” and “wrong on the law.”

Ultimately, any decision to throw out the law would not affect the millions of votes already cast under it in the past four elections.

In 2019, the Republican-controlled Legislature authorized no-excuse mail-in voting for all voters, expanding upon a provision in the state constitution that required the state to provide the option for voters in specific circumstances.

Those circumstances include being out of town on business, illness, physical disability, election day duties or religious observance.

Every Republican lawmaker, except one, voted for the legislation in a deal with Wolf, who had sought the mail-in voting provision. In exchange, Wolf agreed to get rid of the straight-ticket voting ballot option that Republicans had sought as a way to protect their suburban candidates from an anti-Trump wave in 2020′s election.

The constitution does not explicitly say that the Legislature cannot extend absentee voting to others.

However, Republican challengers say the constitution intended that absentee voting be strictly limited, citing a passage that says voters must live in an election district for at least 60 days where they “shall offer to vote.”

In the opinion, the three Republican judges agreed, saying that passage had been cited in two prior state Supreme Court decisions invalidating laws passed in 1839 and 1923 to expand absentee voting.

The dissenting Democrats say a separate provision of the constitution empowered lawmakers to provide no-excuse mail-in voting. That provision says elections “shall be by ballot or by such other method as may be prescribed by law.”

Raff Donelson, an associate professor of law at Penn State’s Dickinson Law School who teaches constitutional law, said he disagreed on a couple points with the majority opinion.

One point, Donelson said, is that it doesn’t make sense to read the constitution as restricting the right to cast an absentee ballot. On voting matters, that’s not how the constitution typically works, Donelson said.

Besides, the constitution seems to bluntly give lawmakers the power to prescribe voting by any method, and that cannot be negated by another provision in the constitution, he said.

In addition to baselessly attacking mail-in voting through much of 2020, Trump also later claimed, without evidence, that the election was stolen from him in critical battleground states including Pennsylvania.

An Associated Press investigation into potential cases of voter fraud in Pennsylvania and the five other battleground states where Trump disputed his loss to President Joe Biden in 2020 found a minuscule number of cases.

Election officials in 11 of the state’s 67 counties identified a total of 26 possible cases of voter fraud, representing 0.03% of Biden’s margin of victory. He defeated Trump in Pennsylvania by more than 80,000 votes.

In one post-election lawsuit in 2020, Republicans sought to invalidate the mail-in voting law and throw out all ballots cast under it in a bid to overturn Democrat Joe Biden’s victory in Pennsylvania.

The state Supreme Court threw it out, saying the plaintiffs “failed to act with due diligence” in waiting to challenge the law until after Trump lost the election.

The U.S. Supreme Court refused appeals to intervene.

BpB9fBi.gif
BpB9fBi.gif
BpB9fBi.gif
BpB9fBi.gif
BpB9fBi.gif
BpB9fBi.gif
Click to expand...

//
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Swordsmyth
Official Thread: 2024 Vote Fraud
12 13 14
Replies
270
Views
56K
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
PAF
Trump’s Brazil Tariff Isn’t America First – It’s Economic Authoritarianism
Replies
0
Views
14
PAF
PAF
PAF
Globalists Are Rebranding Their “Woke Capitalism” Agenda After Crushing Setbacks
Replies
16
Views
115
devil21
D
PAF
How Billionaires Who Sell to the U.S. Government Control the U.S. Government
Replies
1
Views
20
TheTexan
TheTexan
Intrepid
LEGACY MEDIA TRUMP HOAX LIST ***OFFICIAL THREAD***
Replies
6
Views
907
Madison320
M
Back
Top