Official Thread: 2020 Vote Fraud

[showpan]

DOCUMENT: 64 PAGE LAWSUIT FILED IN GA BY TRUMP!! Hours ago, Big tech tried to prevent it from Electronically Filing before Midnight Deadline, but Trump predicted it, & served it Physically!!

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Trump-v.-Raffensperger.pdf

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Audio of Planned shut down at 10pm in GA. Go to 28 min mark.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...1-pm-led-team-count-stashed-suitcase-ballots/

 

[showpan]

Audio of Planned shut down at 10pm in GA. Go to 28 min mark.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...1-pm-led-team-count-stashed-suitcase-ballots/

AWESOME...I knew somebody would eventually bring this up. That guy is lying. You can actually see his nose getting bigger in the real video of this meeting in which he tries to debunk the Sate Farm video evidence that he admits he hasn't even watched it yet.
For one, they made an actual press release stating they were sending everyone home.
For 2, they have sworn affidavits stating they were TOLD to go home.
For 3, even if they left on their own, which they did NOT, the GA law is very clear that to continue counting without observers was ILLEGAL.
4, the State Farm video clearly shows the woman in purple running the same stack through 3 times!!!
5. the suitcases under that table were illegal because there is no chain of custody
8. They used a burst pipe as an excuse to send everyone home but now the truth has come out that it was a urinal had over flowed....lol

......there is more I'm sure I'm missing but you get the point. This guy lied and nothing has been debunked.


https://thefederalist.com/2020/12/0...unting-video-was-not-debunked-not-even-close/

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/pip...using-hour-delay-processing/story?id=73981348


BTW, this is the meeting with video, not just audio:

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

AWESOME...I knew somebody would eventually bring this up. That guy is lying. You can actually see his nose getting bigger in the real video of this meeting in which he tries to debunk the Sate Farm video evidence that he admits he hasn't even watched it yet.
For one, they made an actual press release stating they were sending everyone home.
For 2, they have sworn affidavits stating they were TOLD to go home.
For 3, even if they left on their own, which they did NOT, the GA law is very clear that to continue counting without observers was ILLEGAL.
4, the State Farm video clearly shows the woman in purple running the same stack through 3 times!!!
5. the suitcases under that table were illegal because there is no chain of custody
8. They used a burst pipe as an excuse to send everyone home but now the truth has come out that it was a urinal had over flowed....lol

......there is more I'm sure I'm missing but you get the point. This guy lied and nothing has been debunked.


https://thefederalist.com/2020/12/0...unting-video-was-not-debunked-not-even-close/

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/pip...using-hour-delay-processing/story?id=73981348


BTW, this is the meeting with video, not just audio:

I think the best part is they publicly lied about it. Proving They have zero credibility

 

[phill4paul]

USB handoff guy caught on video looking under table at hidden ballots, looking around to see who is looking at him, then doing a victory cheer.

[video]https://streamable.com/4je5vz[/video]

 

[showpan]

USB handoff guy caught on video looking under table at hidden ballots, looking around to see who is looking at him, then doing a victory cheer.

[video]https://streamable.com/4je5vz[/video]

I saw this too, sucks that we can't get those vids to show up in the threads with all of the youtube censoring and vids disappearing. Youtube is slowly declining as we speak just as twitter and FB is.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Rep. Daniel McCarthy Announces Arizona Legislators Invoked Article 2, Section 1 – Meaning Arizona is Officially a Contested Election

https://www.rightjournalism.com/vid...means-that-we-have-a-contested-outcome-in-ar/

 

[Brian4Liberty]

This really is because it wasn't even about Trump, it was about marijuana...lol....I hope they got the hard drives and USB's before they were wiped

Yeah, I keep hearing about "machines" being examined. That doesn't mean anything if they have been wiped, reset or modified since the election.

And who remembers when the FBI wanted to look at the DNC server used by the Awan brothers and Becerra gave them a fake server?

 

[showpan]

 

[phill4paul]

Yeah, I keep hearing about "machines" being examined. That doesn't mean anything if they have been wiped, reset or modified since the election.

And who remembers when the FBI wanted to look at the DNC server used by the Awan brothers and Becerra gave them a fake server?

That's been my thoughts on it. But, I'm not a computer guru so I have know idea if tampering can be found. Because I think we both know that these machines have already been tampered with to cover up everything.

 

[Sonny Tufts]

Rep. Daniel McCarthy Announces Arizona Legislators Invoked Article 2, Section 1 – Meaning Arizona is Officially a Contested Election

https://www.rightjournalism.com/vid...means-that-we-have-a-contested-outcome-in-ar/

There are 90 members in the AZ legislature -- 60 in the House and 30 in the Senate. Eight Senators and 20 representatives (the folks who signed the letter) have no authority to speak for all the rest, or even a majority of the rest, nor do they have the authority to decertify anything.

Move along; nothing to see here except political posturing.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

That's been my thoughts on it. But, I'm not a computer guru so I have know idea if tampering can be found. Because I think we both know that these machines have already been tampered with to cover up everything.

I am the farthest thing from an IT guy. I am at full capacity rebooting my computer. Forensic Files always talks about computer data and always says that erasing does not remove it only frees up space and the data remains until it is written over. I also think Col. Waldren has said that he can get the data from the machines but I am not sure.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

There are 90 members in the AZ legislature -- 60 in the House and 30 in the Senate. Eight Senators and 20 representatives (the folks who signed the letter) have no authority to speak for all the rest, or even a majority of the rest, nor do they have the authority to decertify anything.

Move along; nothing to see here except political posturing.

I am sure before too long we will not be talking about this anymore. It is easy to be on the side of the masses. Good thing you were not at the Alamo or someplace where it takes guts and courage to stand up against the machine or enemy. If you think everything was fine with this election, and the election should not be challenged, I would say you are not as astute as you claim to be. If this were Ron Paul, would your opinion be different?

 

[Sonny Tufts]

If you think everything was fine with this election, and the election should not be challenged, I would say you are not as astute as you claim to be. If this were Ron Paul, would your opinion be different?

Neither I nor any court has seen any evidence that would warrant a different result in the election. Trump does have a right to challenge, but not with baseless and incoherent claims. Now at the last minute we have the Texas AG and a group of AZ legislators pandering to the conspiracy-theorizing Trump supporters with empty rhetoric that will have no legal effect.

Trump knew there was a good chance he would lose, which is why he started all the "the election will be stolen" crap a long time ago. Given that he's a chronic and habitual liar (c'mon, Trumpies -- you KNOW he lies. "Alternative facts" indeed), it's a shame so many people believe his narrative.

 

[phill4paul]

Neither I nor any court

Well, that certainly settles it then.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Neither I nor any court has seen any evidence that would warrant a different result in the election. Trump does have a right to challenge, but not with baseless and incoherent claims. Now at the last minute we have the Texas AG and a group of AZ legislators pandering to the conspiracy-theorizing Trump supporters with empty rhetoric that will have no legal effect.

Trump knew there was a good chance he would lose, which is why he started all the "the election will be stolen" crap a long time ago. Given that he's a chronic and habitual liar (c'mon, Trumpies -- you KNOW he lies. "Alternative facts" indeed), it's a shame so many people believe his narrative.

People believe what they want to believe. I don't think I would be comfortable with a court that started out by calling the claims baseless, incoherent and conspiracy theories.

The "prove it" argument is legitimate. There is an accusation, and the burden of proof is on the accuser. Usually that accuser is government, and this principle is meant to protect people from runaway government. In this case, it is government that is accused, and playing defense.

An analogy of the burden of proof would be a national company like Walmart saying "$100 million of our merchandise was stolen last year." The response is "prove it".

So Walmart provides video of evidence of several shop-lifters. And the peanut gallery response is "that does not add up to $100 million".

Walmart next provides a video of a group of employees in a warehouse loading merchandise onto a truck. Response: "that does not add up to $100 million".

Walmart then says, a bunch of money was stolen by hackers into our systems. Response: "Prove it. Do you have video?"

Walmart then provides video of a mob looting an entire store. Response: "that does not add up to $100 million".

People will believe what they want to believe.

 

[Sonny Tufts]

Well, that certainly settles it then.

You know, when court after court after court (including at least one judge who was appointed by Trump) rejects the claims brought by Trump's lawyers, what is one to conclude? (a) The lawyers were incompetent (if so, Trump was even more incompetent in hiring them); (b) the lawyers were simply following Trump's instructions to litigate, litigate, and litigate and the merits of the cases be damned; (c) all of the judges (both trial and appellate) were part of a massive conspiracy; (d) there was no evidence to back up the claims; (e) other legal rules that would be applied to any other litigant -- e.g., the plaintiffs didn't have standing, the alleged claims didn't warrant the relief that the plaintiffs asked for, or the plaintiffs waited too long to complain.

Is it totally beyond your belief that the judges were just doing their job according to the law?

 

[phill4paul]

You know, when court after court after court (including at least one judge who was appointed by Trump)

Well..didn't need anything after. You admit that they were Democrat judges excepting one or possibly two "Trump" judges.

But, still kept reading...

Is it totally beyond your belief that the judges were just doing their job according to the law?

Aherm...
(a) The judges were incompetent ...
(b) the judges were simply following special interest, as opposed to common interest, instructions...
(c) all of the judges believe that they are tasked with being an activist judge which believe they create law instead of adjudicating parties challenges instead of remaining neutral
(d) there was witness testimony describing impropriety. Witness testimony is considered evidence. Always has been.
etc. etc.

 

[Contumacious]

Steny Hoyer is RETARDED, to the max. !!!!!!!!!!

 

[Sonny Tufts]

Well..didn't need anything after. You admit that they were Democrat judges excepting one or possibly two "Trump" judges.

But, still kept reading...



Aherm...
(a) The judges were incompetent ...
(b) the judges were simply following special interest, as opposed to common interest, instructions...
(c) all of the judges believe that they are tasked with being an activist judge which believe they create law instead of adjudicating parties challenges instead of remaining neutral
(d) there was witness testimony describing impropriety. Witness testimony is considered evidence. Always has been.
etc. etc.

And SCOTUS just declined to hear the appeal in the PA case. So Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Alito, Barrett, and Thomas are all part of the big bad conspiracy? Who knew?