Official Thread: 2020 Vote Fraud

[Contumacious]

PA is wobbling

The Pennsylvania issues are exactly the same as those resolved in Bush v Gore (2000).

Republicans win.



Oh yeah babe


.

 

[showpan]

The Pennsylvania issues are exactly the same as those resolved in Bush v Gore (2000).

Republicans win.



Oh yeah babe


.

yep, and the fact that Alito agreed to hear the case means he knows it too. PA will fall and GA will definitely go to Trump. It won't stop there either, they are all like dominos at this point.

 

[showpan]

They keep denying the whole GA video but they even told ABC they left at 10:30 that night...lol

 

[showpan]

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

They keep denying the whole GA video but they even told ABC they left at 10:30 that night...lol

Democrats denying that and fact checking saying Republicans don't know how elections are run or standard protocol. No one was sent home people just decided to leave. That is what they say.

 

[Sonny Tufts]

yep, and the fact that Alito agreed to hear the case means he knows it too. PA will fall and GA will definitely go to Trump. It won't stop there either, they are all like dominos at this point.

Alito set December 9 as the date for the State to respond by. Guess what December 8 is? It's the safe-harbor date by which a State's certification of electors becomes binding. It seems even Alito sees no merit in the application.

3 USC § 5

If any State shall have provided, by laws enacted prior to the day fixed for the appointment of the electors, for its final determination of any controversy or contest concerning the appointment of all or any of the electors of such State, by judicial or other methods or procedures, and such determination shall have been made at least six days before the time fixed for the meeting of the electors, such determination made pursuant to such law so existing on said day, and made at least six days prior to said time of meeting of the electors, shall be conclusive, and shall govern in the counting of the electoral votes as provided in the Constitution, and as hereinafter regulated, so far as the ascertainment of the electors appointed by such State is concerned.

 

[tod evans]

 

[showpan]

Alito set December 9 as the date for the State to respond by. Guess what December 8 is? It's the safe-harbor date by which a State's certification of electors becomes binding. It seems even Alito sees no merit in the application.

All this means is that by Dec 8th, PA can no longer change it's mind and frankly, we don't want them to so they can drag this out any longer although Alito did ask for a quick decision. It would be better for SCOTUS to rule against all their corrupt judges and let congress decide rather than continue arguing with communists. Of course PA legislators still have a chance to do the right thing before hand. Once the electoral votes are certified by the states, then they get passed to congress who then decides to accept them or not. All you have to do is have one member of Congress and one from the Senate to object based upon SCOTUS ruling and then they get to decide on who gets the electorate votes regardless of who the state has certified. See the Mo Brooks video a couple posts back.

note added: PA has already gone home for break

 

[Sonny Tufts]

Once the electoral votes are certified by the states, then they get passed to congress who then decides to accept them or not. All you have to do is have one member of Congress and one from the Senate to object based upon SCOTUS ruling and then they get to decide on who gets the electorate votes regardless of who the state has certified.

Brooks doesn't know what he's talking about. Under 3 USC § 15 once a state has certified its electors the only grounds on which Congress can refuse to honor an elector's vote is that the vote wasn't "regularly given" (e.g., the elector was bribed) In other words, rejection can't be based on alleged irregularities in the selection of the electors.
See http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...d-by-US-House-of-Representatives-via-the-12th

Moreover, both the House and the Senate must vote to reject an electoral vote, and the vote in the House is by roll call, not by state delegation. Since the Dems control the House, no votes for Biden will be rejected.

 

[showpan]

Brooks doesn't know what he's talking about. Under 3 USC § 15 once a state has certified its electors the only grounds on which Congress can refuse to honor an elector's vote is that the vote wasn't "regularly given" (e.g., the elector was bribed) In other words, rejection can't be based on alleged irregularities in the selection of the electors.
See http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...d-by-US-House-of-Representatives-via-the-12th

Moreover, both the House and the Senate must vote to reject an electoral vote, and the vote in the House is by roll call, not by state delegation. Since the Dems control the House, no votes for Biden will be rejected.

In breaking news, internet attorney keyboard general tells elected official how to do his job...lol...declares Biden winner

Looks like you won't be getting your wish for communist rule this year comrade.

 

[showpan]

BREAKING: Trump Team Alleges That A Forensics Examination Of Dominion Machine From Ware County,Georgia Found EVIDENCE Of Trump Votes Being Switched To Biden

Today more allegations came from Jody Brownlow Hice who serves as a U.S. Representative for Georgia’s 10th congressional district since 2015 as he made another huge announcement.
He says that yesterday they learned that a forensics examination of a Ware County, GA Dominion Voting Systems machine found votes were switched from President Donald Trump to Joe Biden!
Just a few hours earlier this morning attorney Lin Wood also confirmed the same news, he said that the Dominion voting machines were “updated” with the algorithms developed to steal votes from President Donald Trump.
He said that Governor Brian Kemp Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger knew about this.

https://redstatenation.com/breaking...dence-of-trump-votes-being-switched-to-biden/

 

[showpan]

Look at all those ballots around 2:06 with no return address on them.

She thought she was cool going live on FB....lol


https://thedonald.win/p/11QlB9uBWP/georgia-counter-nearly-confesses/c/

 

[showpan]

 

[nbhadja]

Alito set December 9 as the date for the State to respond by. Guess what December 8 is? It's the safe-harbor date by which a State's certification of electors becomes binding. It seems even Alito sees no merit in the application.

Existing legal challenges can still change things until December 14th even after the December 8th deadline. This is an existing legal challenge. Alito is one of the good guys. I think the SC will merge this PA case with the other cases. Trump will win 5-4. The story was written perfectly with RGB's death right before the election.

 

[showpan]

Existing legal challenges can still change things until December 14th even after the December 8th deadline. This is an existing legal challenge. Alito is one of the good guys. I think the SC will merge this PA case with the other cases. Trump will win 5-4. The story was written perfectly with RGB's death right before the election.

should have just let him live in his libtard fantasy world...lol

 

[Contumacious]

Bwahahahahahahahahaha

That's her alright.


.

 

[showpan]

 

[eleganz]

libertarian and former CEO of overstock Patrick Byrne today confirmed he has been funding a team of white hat hackers since before the election to reverse engineer the election fraud. He solicited donations to https://defendingtherepublic.org which is Sydney Powell's legal defense fund. He said he has been providing "missing pieces" to her.

 

[showpan]

libertarian and former CEO of overstock Patrick Byrne today confirmed he has been funding a team of white hat hackers since before the election to reverse engineer the election fraud. He solicited donations to https://defendingtherepublic.org which is Sydney Powell's legal defense fund. He said he has been providing "missing pieces" to her.

He came out weeks ago....lol

 

[showpan]

PA is on the docket. So much for safe harbor.


https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html