LOL. Nice word there. What does "systemic" mean these days, in post-modern, Critical Theory terms?
No, it is not systemic if you want to indict the entire process of voting. Valid, legal, fair and unbiased elections do occur, and are occurring in some places. But as I said, fraud is not a "single" method. Democrats have modified the voting process in many states that they control, with the obvious goal of using it to their advantage. But there are other simultaneous methods of vote fraud. If you want to call that "systemic" only because they modified the process in an attempt to manipulate the results, then it might qualify.
And back to your use of the word "systemic". The post-modern, SJW, CRT use of the word is to indict and blame the entire system and everything that comes from it, as well as collectively demonizing people based upon race. If you want to apply it in that way to this election, then it would be required to accuse every single Democrat of being corrupt, and everything they touch being corrupt, and they all must acknowledge and admit their guilt, and work tirelessly until they die to atone for their sins. I wouldn't go that far.
Exactly, there isn't some evil cabal plotting to change the results nationwide. There are surely many who mail in fake ballots, crooked election workers and officials here and there etc. I don't think it makes any significant difference.
It is taking place in key Democrat controlled districts, counties and states. Yes, some Democrats and aligned cronies at the top do want "to change the results nationwide". And it does make a significant difference.
This is worth watching, if you'd like to hear Ron Paul's perspective:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?550290-Election-2020-Mob-Rule-Has-Arrived