Even if true, I have no idea what any of this ^^^^ has to do with anything I said - which was merely that Trump isn't going to do jack shit, and that the sooner his ardent supporters realize this and stop hoping for change by working within the system, the better.
I repeat: Trump isn't going to do jack shit.
He isn't going to go after Hillary.
He isn't going to "drain the swamp."
He isn't going to "smash the establishment."
He isn't going to do any of the things the cuck-baiting alpha-suckers fap over.
And if he tries, he will discover, as Gail Wynand did in The Fountainhead, that "You don't run things around here" ...
I'm not sure you're addressing my point.
As I noted in the first sentence of my reply, I don't know what your point was.
It seemed to be about the Bushes and Hillary and assorted other things (Sarah Palin?) that had nothing at all to do with anything I had said.
You're saying 1) he won't try and 2) he will fail if he tries. Those are 2 different things.
No. You need to read more carefully.
I did not say "he won't try" to do X (though I won't be surprised if he doesn't).
I said "he isn't going to do" X (and that if he tries, he will fail).
Those are two different things.
I would like to recommend the attempts to drain the swamp. Applaud those, provided I like the idea.
His voters have reason to believe that Trump will be trying to drain the swamp. I would like to see the swamp drained. What you're saying is garden variety cynicism?
I'm just saying it's would be interesting to see how that will go. Trump might be fighting with the swamp dwellers, and that would be fun to see.
What I am saying is garden variety realism. Even if Trump tries to "drain the swamp" (whatever that vague platitude is supposed to mean), he will not do so. None of these perennial "drain the swamp"
intifadas (term limits, campaign finance reform, lobbyist reforms, etc., etc., etc.) have ever worked, and none of them ever will. Even on those rare occasions when they actually pass in some form, they only serve to rearrange the deck chairs. They only treat the symptoms and do absolutely nothing about the disease. The disease is the vast and overweening power of the federal government. Until a radical and extreme "power-ectomy" is performed, trying to "drain the swamp" is like trying to empty the ocean with a bucket. And there is nothing in Trump's "platform" (such as it is) that indicates he has even the slightest interest in seriously and significantly curtailing the power of the federal government. Just the opposite, in fact - his "planks," if they are to be taken seriously, would require the maintenance and increase of federal power.
Trump isn't going to fight any swamp dwellers. He is going to make deals with them. That is what he does; he is a deal-maker. He has told you this.
Oh, who knows how things will turn out.
But it will be nice to have a non-puppet in the White House. As Lew Rockwell says: because he is his own man, at least there's some chance that Trump might actually do something good (!!!). As the perpetually optimistic little boy in Angels in the Outfield says: "It could happen!" I know, I know, maybe the Cubs could even win the World Series, too -- but it's theoretically possible.
Maybe Wayne Allen Root, the one prominent(ish) libertarian to be good to Trump instead of nasty, will have some place or influence in a Trump administration.
So, yeah. It will be nice to have a non-puppet in the White House.
It is also really very, very nice to have:
3. Two political dynasties destroyed
2. The corrupt, useless, loser GOP, Inc. and Conservative Thinktanks, Inc., both severely weakened
and, #1, the most delicious and important of all:
1. The main stream media utterly discredited, crushed, and destroyed.
*shrug* Also non-responsive. I didn't say anything at all about what it is or is not "really very, very nice to have."
All I said is that Trump is not going to do any of the wild-eyed, grandiose things that have already been credited to him as if they were
fait accompli.
But as for those "really very, very nice" things you think you have now: I think they are just the same sort of enthusiastic but empty hyperbole.
The deep state and its accoutrements (the lapdog media, political "dynasties," etc., etc.) are not going to go away or stop doing what they do merely because a bunch of people put some marked-up pieces of paper into boxes one day. In fact, such diversions are immensely useful as "pressure valves" - which is why the system indulges the charade in the first place.
The singers may change, but the song remains the same ...