OFFICIAL : Meet The Press thread : Sunday Morning!!

I saw a lot of people say Ron did great. I thought he had his ass handed to him. I watched it in horror. It was the worst Ron Paul interview I have seen to date. I have not watched Tim before, so don't know if that is par for the course, but he seemed brutal.
 
James Ostrowski from LRC seems to think that Ron did fantastic. In his words, an A+++
 
I haven't had cable in years, so I haven't seen much of the new series. I hear good things mostly.
 
I shook my head when I saw a quote from Dondero, lol. What a joke that guy is.

Dr. Paul did fine. It was a tough interview.

I really liked when Russert pressed him about the independent run, and the last thing Paul got out was, "Why don't you ask John McCain that question when he comes on." That was awesome because there are whispers of McCain/Leiberman trying something like that.
 
Oh man, some guy is shouting out Ron on the Chris Matthews show!


Chris has a segment on "best move" of 2007. Ron Paul was not given as a choice, but the last guy went out on his own, and said Ron anyway!

Props to that guy, whoever he is.

Andrew Sullivan. He endorsed Ron for the Republican nomination.
 
He knocked the curve balls out of the park and left Tim scurrying to throw the next ones. Tim tried to make him look incompetent, but while Ron Paul may be getting on in years he is far from ready for the pasture. Unless it's the White House lawn, that is. :D
 
No, he made Ron Paul look pretty bad. My parents who are undecided think it's going bad so far. We're just biased.
 
So how did Ron do and how did the interview go on a scale of 1-10?

I don't think you are going to be able to find any two people who will give you the same score. It is by far RP's most "forceful" interview but at the same time Tim is a professional and very very good at his job. RP takes a lot of hits from things he is quoted as saying during the '88 campaign.

One plus is that he gets plenty of time to explain why he takes the positions he does.
 
Hell, I knew how many troops were overseas, and Im not running for president.

Since Blackwater's mercenaries, the CIA and other civilian subcontractors are not included in any estimates of the total US occupation force, no, you don't know the numbers. You're probably off by 6 figures.

Black ops money, oil companies' involvement, details of the 14 permanent bases, the total number of the American presence, troops from other countries that are there at the behest of the US, etc., etc., are not common knowledge. When RP says we should come home, he means we should come home. As commander-in-chief he would deal with the withdrawal in detail with the joint chiefs and the various intelligence agencies involved to make that happen.

His knowing the exact numbers or the exact withdrawal plans for Tim Russert's (or anyone else's) gratification is irrelevant, and not an appropriate question, IMHO.

The same goes for the elimination of the IRS. Since the military's massive budget is intertwined with many agencies and includes trillions of 'lost' dollars, it would be lunacy to describe the exact timetables for such an historic achievement.

It suffices to say that the plan would be to drastically cut military and other Empire expenditures (which a President can move unilaterally to do) before turning to domestic spending cuts which can only be achieved by consensus and working with Congress.

Do you really think Russert would have allowed the proper time to discuss these issues?

Bosso
 
What? He got owned on the earmark issue.

I think he did a good job considering there isn't really a good way to handle that.

He laughed about it and basically said that he is just trying to get his constituents money back for them.
 
Back
Top