Just got finished watching the show. For the most part, Paul held his own. He started and finished strong, but was a little weak in the middle. He was strong in his discussion of Israel, foreign policy, immigration, drugs, civil rights and slavery, using facts and historical precedents to back up his opinions He was pretty weak once again when talking about the budget. He needs to give more specific dollar amounts (cutting out the income tax will bring the budget down by x dollars, bringing the troops home from overseas bases will save us y dollars, etc.) instead of being so vague. He was incredibly weak on earmarks, so much so that I will be researching this on my own to see if Paul's laughter was from the outlandishness of the claims or due to his incapability of putting together an argument against the claims. I enjoyed the fact that he was more openly hostile about not running third party, stating that they just raised $10 million and asking Russert if he questioned any of the other candidates about that.
All in all, I believe this interview will gain him a few votes (though not many), but won't cost him any.