Official: Lew Rockwell Converts Naomi Wolf

Incredibly provocative and informed book!

Hi. I want to recommend this book which focusses on monatary policy and US and British Foreign policy against the rest of the World

I have read lots and lots and still learned a lot of new stuff, I know this is not a very good review but I am holding a baby and my wife is yelling at me but I just have to say please check this one out I will try to be more specific later.


A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order. Be sure to look at the 2004 edition. Incredible book even for those who have read a lot!!!!!!!!
Here is one review

Craig Stern (Flagstaff, AZ USA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order (Paperback)
I first ran across this book referenced in a footnote about three years ago and tried to track it down. First I tried to purchase it, but found that it was out of print and used copies were going for $100.00+ on the internet. I found this curious since it was relatively recent (1993) and, given its topic, was certainly of tremendous interest to US readers, even before the events of 9/11 and the subsequent Gulf War II. I was fortunate to find it in my university library and have since read it several times.
I am tempted to go 'on and on' about this book, especially since it is not easily available for people to read. Nor does anyone seem to feel that they can (or are able to?) republish what should be a 'best seller' in the current geopolitical climate and circumstances. Engdahl, whose personal background includes engineering and law (Princeton), working in Texas oil industry, and international economics (University of Stockholm), does a penetrating and eloquent job of sorting out the complex web that connects the controlling interests of international politics with the goals and objectives of global oil and financial interests, these having merged in the last century into the powerful and dominant hegemony of an Anglo-American consortium.

There are so many revelations that are so well documented that one has to slow down and completely reorientate his or her conception of and attitude toward recent history. His tone is neither particularly vindictive nor is it conspiratorial. It looks at people and events and provides plausible motives and methods that are not part of the conventional awareness. For example, (fact) the British navy decided in the late 19th century to change their primary fuel source from coal to oil, thereby (objective) needing to secure access to oil reserves, basically in perpetuity. (result) British agreements for oil resources with the Sheikh of Kuwait date from 1899. (fact) Oil then comes to supplant coal as the primary energy source for all of the industrializing world, and a decade later Germany threatens to become the leading industrialized nation in Europe and (objective) needs a secure source of oil, so they begin construction on the Berlin to Baghdad railway intending to capitalize on agreements to import Iraqi oil. (question) How does Britain meet this emerging geopolitical threat. (objective) Block Germany's access to Middle East oil. (result) Curiously WWI begins with an out-of-the-way assassination in Croatia that just happens to occur near the route of that railway. War ensues and not only is the B-to-B railway cut off, but Germany loses all colonial power in the Middle East.

Shortly after WWI the leaders of the seven major western oil companies meet and agree to not compete with each other but to cooperate, and in 1928 drew up the Red Line agreement that gave virtually control of virtually all Middle East oil to the Anglo-American cartel. Even France's portion was minimalized to Turkish reserves. The Anglo-American consortium came to be known as the Seven Sisters and over the course of the ensuing decades become more and more infused with global banking and financial interestes, i.e., Rockefeller, J.P.Morgan, the Warburgs, the Rotheschilds, Brown Harriman, etc., coming to dominate the world economy by controlling the primary energy source. It is "all about oil" and has been since the turn of the century.

Engdahl's references are extensive and substantiate his disturbing interpretation of history, like the intentional suppression of the German Mark after WWI and the intentional manipulation of the OPEC oil embargo of the 1970s as a premise to artificially inflate global energy costs (a Bilderberg target objective), thereby making BritPetr North Sea oil exploration efforts solvent and bankrupting the debt burdened Third World.

Engdahl's revelatory insights go up through Gulf War I and one can only speculate as to his thoughts on the current Bush administration's economic/tax policies, the Iraq intervention, and their relationship to consolidating control of the global economy into the hands of a few staggeringly wealthy individuals and corporations. This book should be IN PRINT

http://www.amazon.com/Century-War-Anglo-American-Politics-World/dp/074532309X
 
Until one is willing to evaluate all motive alternatives for each vector-leader then
one will continue to be stuck in vector-leader-worship and not be able to
develop the most logical conclusion to the set of facts at hand. It is important to
break free from the assumptions that the leaders in ones particular vector
represent the vectored-group's interests. Why can one so clearly see this with
Obamabots but not see it when it applies to ones own vector?

three cheers for the thread-winner.
 
You seem very aware and I will not say you are absolutely wrong. What I will say is that you can not let paranoia and jadedness cloud your judgement and alienate those who may really be having the curtain of deception lifted.

“Sometimes paranoia's just having all the facts.”

- William S. Burroughs


Until one is willing to evaluate all motive alternatives for each vector-leader then
one will continue to be stuck in vector-leader-worship and not be able to
develop the most logical conclusion to the set of facts at hand. It is important to
break free from the assumptions that the leaders in ones particular vector
represent the vectored-group's interests. Why can one so clearly see this with
Obamabots but not see it when it applies to ones own vector?

three cheers for the thread-winner.

Who pretty much contends Lew is working for the NWO...

My takeaway from this discussion is to remain vigilant in my critical thinking, even
when the information is coming from a "trusted leader." Seems like sage advice to me.
 
There appears to be none, which is precisely how it is supposed to work:
Vector-leaders capture vector-followers and develop trust relationships that
stifle the follower's critical thinking.

I am not a paleo-conservative. Lew Rockwell ain't my leader and he ain't stifiling my critical thinking. :rolleyes:

Of course you think you have no constraints. That is precisely the goal of the psychology.

More bullshit... :rolleyes: There are none, because I have none. If I do, point them out. You've failed so far...

And what are the sources of your inputs? Do you know who is behind those sources....and their motivations? Have you honestly and thoroughly analyzed the inputs, or do you rely on trust when receiving inputs from vector-leaders?

Lmao... who is behind the people who are attacking the status quo? Who are screaming from the roof tops, to reject the two party system, to not vote? No not give your consent to criminal actions? Who promote the Austrian school, praxeology and the truth? Those who hate the state for what it is, not what it proposes to be... What are their motivations?

Ummm... LIBERTY.. how about, wanting to be left the f--- alone? What about wanting a better society, peace, prosperity, truth and wisedom? Have I thoroughly analyzed the "inputs"... yes, and quite honestly, it'd appear - more than you have.

The full complexity of the psychological game being played on you and the real
face of those actors who perpetrate these games.

Do you really think betrayal is always done by actors who look like the bad-guy?
Betrayal only really works with those who are trusted.

No I don't. I'm always weary, as I've always stated. I don't blindly follow anyone, so get a grip.

You obviously can't see what is in front of your face, and you appear to have totally convinced yourself that you are now awake and have a high level of understanding of truth. Like in Plato's Cave, I can show you the truth but you will only continue to berate me, as you have continually done in this thread, and fail to see what is obvious. The only way for you to see what you cannot is to re-evaluate your trusted vector-leaders, their motivations, and the information they perpetrate. Only then, will you see. But ultimately, you must see for yourself, for you will never accept it otherwise....that is clear.

I'm moving-on from this thread. Good luck.

“Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance.”
~ Confucius

I haven't failed to do anything. Stop assigning bullshit and erecting strawmans. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top