wgadget
Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2007
- Messages
- 13,946
It does work, but it creates outputs less energy than it takes to get going. So basically, it's neat, but not significant. There have been a few articles written about the discovery...
Since it appears we now have now achieved more than unity, I am going to do an embargo on releasing all further information.
It does work, but it outputs less energy than it takes to generate the radio waves. So basically, it's neat, but not significant. There have been a few articles written about the discovery...
According to this site (which has a lot of info on this invention), Kanzius said on June 6th, 2007:
Over unity means that it outputs more energy then you put in.
Here's a good article on it.
In the article, Scavuzzo says, "the Kanzius invention requires too much energy to be worth celebrating," but keep in mind that he isn't at Penn State where the machine is being tested. Professor Roy, who is actually testing the machine at Penn State says, "This is the biggest discovery in 100 years in water research." So it's Scavuzzo's theory vs. Roy's empirical evidence. Who are you going to believe?
To know if this works, you would need to know if the flame from the test tube would produce enough useable energy to power the frequency generator that is making the water burn in the first place.
One thing that was a little disturbing was the fact that he was willing to sell the technology to raise money to cure cancer.
I hate to say it, but finding an alternative energy to get us off mideast oil might be more important than curing cancer.
I think what's even more incredible is that this is not moved and is still in the Ron Paul discussion section.
Now that's a miracle.