Occupy Wall Street dudes want the Tea Party to show up

Do You Think the Tea Parties Should Support Occupy Wall Street?

  • Yes

    Votes: 67 57.3%
  • No

    Votes: 50 42.7%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
These people want peace and freedom for all. I see their way of thinking more as identifying the problems well and being motivated to fight for it. This is not so different from most of us here. The difference is in understanding that changing to different government is not really change. It's hard to see that less government = more freedom until you have that shift in thinking. Then every aspect of your life is changed by it. I think there are opportunities to educate open minds if people feel compelled to go, but I don't think their message reflects what we stand for. More power to them for standing up for their rights. I respect that a great deal.
 
These people want peace and freedom for all. I see their way of thinking more as identifying the problems well and being motivated to fight for it. This is not so different from most of us here. The difference is in understanding that changing to different government is not really change. It's hard to see that less government = more freedom until you have that shift in thinking. Then every aspect of your life is changed by it. I think there are opportunities to educate open minds if people feel compelled to go, but I don't think their message reflects what we stand for. More power to them for standing up for their rights. I respect that a great deal.

This^^ Even if they don't have the best solutions they are speaking up against something that is very, very evil...more power to them!
 
Educate, but do not associate.

Beneath the surface, the similarities end pretty quickly.

We both want to get rid of (aspects of) the current system. The difference is, they want to replace it with something much worse.

Many of them have been bred their whole lives to be filled with hate and vitriol for what we stand for.

It's unwarranted, but try explaining that to them. There are far more receptive minds out there to spend your breath on, IMO.
 
These people want peace and freedom for all.
But they're definition of freedom is totally skewed. It is not freedom to forcefully take property that belongs to another. It is not freedom to seek equality of wealth and influence. Freedom is about equality before the law and NO OTHER KIND. Because any other kind of equality requires destroying freedom. This isn't Thomas Jefferson it's Pancho Villa.
 
But they're definition of freedom is totally skewed. It is not freedom to forcefully take property that belongs to another. It is not freedom to seek equality of wealth and influence. Freedom is about equality before the law and NO OTHER KIND. Because any other kind of equality requires destroying freedom. This isn't Thomas Jefferson it's Pancho Villa.



You Can Still Trust the Communists: To be Communists, Socialists, Statists, and Progressives Too
- Fred Schwarz and David Noebel


You Can Still Trust the Communists to Be Communists (Socialists and Progressives Too), the 40th anniversary edition of Dr. Fred Schwarz’s classic anti-Communist book, You Can Trust the Communists … to Be Communists, has been updated with several chapters by David Noebel of the Colorado-based Summit Ministries.​


The Honesty of Communists and Other Totalitarians


Thomas R. Eddlem | The New American
10 February 2011
 
But they're definition of freedom is totally skewed. It is not freedom to forcefully take property that belongs to another. It is not freedom to seek equality of wealth and influence. Freedom is about equality before the law and NO OTHER KIND. Because any other kind of equality requires destroying freedom. This isn't Thomas Jefferson it's Pancho Villa.
I'd agree with you if the capitalism we have now didn't evolve out of people taking each other's property forcibly as well. Can you really call our capitalistic system today, which has been continually shaped by the State for at least the past 100+ years, "freedom"? Now, it may be that some of these protesters want to transition to a system that would involve more exploitation by the State (more commonly known as state communism), and these people likely won't come around to our side, but there are probably leftists in that crowd that are more libertarian in nature, too. As Ron Paul notes, this country was born of mistrust of government and big business partnerships. The founders of this country were anti-Establishment in this very regard. Not *every* protester here is going to be your typical Che Guevara commie.

I'd say if some of the more dedicated activists who happen to agree with what Ron Paul says re: corporatism want to go and take a stab at it, I wouldn't really care. I don't know if I would necessarily want their names associated with Ron Paul just because of the field day the media would have with it, but if they provide a general education on libertarian principles and how libertarians aren't for letting America be at the mercy of big corporations (a common misconception thrown around by liberals), we could see a great coalition forming. Even Rothbard aligned himself with the anti-Establishment left in the 60's until they got co-opted.
 
Last edited:
BAD, BAD, BAD idea to associate with these people. That is not how you win a Republican primary.

Anything RP shows up there and the MSM media will run with negative stories.

This is a mainstream campaign to win the Republican nomination for president.
 
Here is the "call to action" for Occupy Wall Street. This tells you what motivates the protesters and what they would like to see happen. So, checking it against my own beliefs...

No! This is anti-freedom speak.

No. This suggest that the manager is not entitled to be paid for increasing the efficiency of those he manages. Obviously wrong.

What does that mean? I don't believe that there is a conflict between the right to life and the right to property. Specifically, my right to life doesn't give me claim on your property.

HELL NO! They are advocating labor violence.

This is not a true liberty movement. No one should support it.

That's a blog, one man's opinion and not the consensus of the protesters down in wall street.
 
The problems are the same not matter where you stand. The problem is each side wants different solutions to fix the problem. If each side is willing to drop their strict adherence to ideologies for just a day, they would find they have more in common then the media tells them they do! I support the Tea Party going, many folks I know HATED the bailouts and many belong to Bill O'Reilly/ Tea Party mindset. I believe it was a Republican Senator in Utah who was dropped for supporting the bailouts in 2010, so there is one thing in common here. Join up start a dialog, only when we break the left/right mindset and start to combine our numbers around single causes like this, then we can start to affect politics and national sentiment around these VERY important issues.
 
Let me make this totally clear. If any of you show up there with RP signs shirts etc, you are HURTING his chances in the Republican primary.
 
The thing is they haven't even come up with a message or "demands" as they call it, or didn't for most of the time they have been down there. I watched their stream for the first three or four days very intently and have peeked in every once the last few days to stay updated.

They have these "General Assemblies" which would basically be a meeting of all the protesters getting together to discuss the various logistical issues since they really don't have a traditional top-down structure or hierarchy organizing this event they take turns speaking in a "stack" basically a line of people taking turns at the megaphone or the "people's mic" or "human mic" if the police do not allow them to use a megaphone, especially after 9:00pm.

Anyway, yes there are some people down there that are commies, anti-capitalist, anarchists, anti what have you, etc. I'm not going to deny it. But the number of these people are relatively small compared to the number of total participants of this protest. Those types of people (the commies) show up at every protest regardless of what it is in New York, those that have been to a protest in New York will understand this. They have been there at every anti-war protest since before we even went into Iraq and long before that I'm sure, this is New York after all. They are going to talk to anyone that is willing to let them speak as does any organization in New York that tries to build regardless of what it is, they will go to where the people are.

I speak from experience I was at the pre-Iraq anti war protest/march/rally in 2003 and I remember them (the commies) being there trying to convince others the benefits of communism. I remember an assortment of various different ethnic backgrounds and everyone across the political spectrum coming together for the anti war event. There were so many people down one street that the police were closing that the people were being pushed by the police right into some police on horse back on the other side of the street only to get trampled on because of the police miscommunication of what streets could actually be used. It was poorly planned and some suspected the police was giving false information on what streets were available to frustrate and confuse those that were participating in the protest so they would go home. I remember reading on the web and being told by the police what subway stations were open so protesters could get off the train cars and join the crowds only to find those stations closed. I also remember very clearly one individual in the middle of time square after the rally/march started to break up waving a HUGE Anarchy flag which the police immediately closed in on. But anyway that's another story. What I'm trying to say is trust me when I say every possible person from every political belief or economic belief came out of the wood work for that event and it was well over 200,000 participating. This was before I ever heard the name Ron Paul.
You can read more about it here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_15,_2003_anti-war_protest#New_York

Anyway getting back to this protest the numbers of the people you describe (the commies) are actually very small in comparison to the total percentage of people that are down there. Like I said I was watching these people for the first few days and to be honest they didn't even have a common set of "demands" or a argument that was being used to describe their protest. During these "general assemblies" they would talk about needing to get to a list of "demands" or a message, I remember one particular person grabbing the megaphone and saying, we seriously need to have a vote and some suggestions on what our message is, because I'm tired of people coming up to me and asking and I don't know what to tell them! He got a round of applause from that. Why? Because the majority of the people down there only know their frustration with the economy and they have seen protests around the world and somewhat understand that there is something wrong but they are not sure what exactly it is or how to deal with it. They were convinced by other protests around the world and in the past that this is something we can do that isn't violent and isn't illegal. Anonymous and other internet groups convinced enough of them to do a protest around Wall Street and so they did.

LOL this kind of reminds me of the movie the Matrix, the majority of those people know there is a problem but they just don't know clearly where the problem comes from but they know it is real. I would say 80+ percent of the people down there are looking for a message all they need to do is be introduced to one that is based on fact, logic and reason and they will meet us half way. But it is up to us to reach out to them otherwise they will be co-opted by those groups you have the most issue with. Basically exactly what happen to the Tea Party post 2008.

Okay LOL I have another way to explain it:

80% of the people down there is these people:


[video=vimeo;13504985]http://vimeo.com/13504985[/video]

LOL HAHHAHAHAHA I knew one day South Park would be useful in making a point about political organizations.

But yea, ok they maybe completely confused right? Like I said they have some understanding that there is a problem but they can't put their finger on it, LOL. Or more importantly what to do about it! This is where we need to come in. :)

This is so close to the truth too, I wish you guys would have watched the stream early on, I mean you can still even if you watch the stream now get a sense that they are not completely sure what they are doing as I guess any grassroots movement goes through that, but I couldn't stop laughing and thinking of this South Park clip while watching some of them talk.
 
Let me make this totally clear. If any of you show up there with RP signs shirts etc, you are HURTING his chances in the Republican primary.

Do you think Ron Paul agrees with you? Any chance you could ask him?
 
Do you think Ron Paul agrees with you? Any chance you could ask him?

If he's taking questions tomorrow when I go see him, I will ask.

I have no idea what the size of the crowd will be like or if that's actually possible, but I will try.
 
Last edited:
Let me make this totally clear. If any of you show up there with RP signs shirts etc, you are HURTING his chances in the Republican primary.
Do you think Ron Paul agrees with you? Any chance you could ask him?

This "Occupy Wall Street" smells of Socialism. Republicans will be against this event and if they see Ron Paul supports there, they'll be against Ron Paul as well.
 
If he's taking questions tomorrow when I go see him, I will ask.

I have no idea what the size of the crowd will be like or if that's actually possible, but I will try.

OK, thanks. As per my update, another way to approach this is on a "separate but equal" sort of basis, i.e., a non-hostile, parallel demonstration. You'd pick a different name than Occupy Wall Street, but you'd set up shop near enough the Occupy Wall Street gatherings that you could float over and have a civil discussion.

Medea Benjamin of Code Pink had gone to her first Tea Party gathering with the idea of mocking the participants, but found out that they mostly seemed normal, she had many fans there, and also about half were anti-war.
Those are the sorts of realizations that I would like to see fostered. You can't - and shouldn't - cooperate in all areas. But it's quite possible to be somebody's political friend in one area, and their political enemy in another. Purists and party bots don't like this, and the plutocrats really don't like this (I'm guessing transpartisan coalition building that threatens the 2 party duopoly scares them more than anything), but free-born citizens of the US should relish the opportunity to exercize their freedom of association to manifest their collective political will, as well as can be done by a heterogeneous population.

Allowing plutocrats and party purists to split the public down the middle is probably the biggest reason that the public is disempowered relative to big money.
 
Misdirected energy. This does nothing to secure the nomination for Dr. Paul.

And worse, the problems on Wall Street are merely a symptom of the Federal Reserve System.

END THE FED
 
This "Occupy Wall Street" smells of Socialism. Republicans will be against this event and if they see Ron Paul supports there, they'll be against Ron Paul as well.

I agree, those people are on working against what we stand for.
 
Back
Top