I want closed borders. I believe in national sovereignty.
Then you're anti-free market and for protectionism, logically (closed borders are labor protectionism, or xenophobia in culture, or both). I believe in individual sovereignty. The nation is a collectivist entity. Nationalism is not patriotism, they are opposed concepts (nationalism means "love of the state", patriotism means "love of countrymen"). The nation is not synonymous with country (one means "state", one means "people"...hence "nation-state" not "country-state") Nationalism and statism are mental disorders.
Individual rights do not have borders ("inalienable" or "unalienable" literally mean "not subject to border or statute", hence the "un" and "alien", and the term "alien" when refering to immigrants). Individual rights of nonviolent individuals always trumps the powers and authorities of states (collectives). You're not libertarian or free market on this issue. You do not support individual rights on this issue.
The "good of the collective" has been the cause of, and excuse for, every atrocity in human history.
Breaking unjust laws like immigration quotas is Civil Disobedience, and I encourage it. It's also not in the Constitution to have quotas on immigration, and they are not the original intent.
I hope more Mexicans jump that border and break the tyrannical laws until our government supports free markets and justice in labor markets and individual rights, and makes it legal to cross as long as you pass a simple background check and medical exam (as the original intent of the Constitution desired).
Until then, why wait 131 years on average to come in legally?
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/0...ion-opening-borders-mexico-let-them-in_2.html
Would you wait 131 years on average to exercise your individual right to free movement? If you would, you'd be dead on average before exercising that right. Do you really think this law is enforcable with those wait times? Think about it rationally. The law is creating criminals, just like drug laws.
Most crossings are not done on private property, BTW, most are done on public property (aka thoroughfares). Hence, they are not aggression...but the law is aggression. It's anti-free market and wrong ethically, period.