Obama just created civilian military

[Dequeant]

jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj

 

[jdmyprez_deo_vindice]

The American people spoke before they truly listened and now they deserve what they get. I hope this gets spread far and wide and people wake up and do something before it is too late, if it is not already!

 

[hillbilly123069]

It was once said,"Forgive them,for they know not what they do."
But the most atrocious acts are yet to come.Especially if Obama manages to get the military oath switched from the Constitution to the off./president.This is too much power for 1 man.What we need to do is campaign some people into congress in 2010,if it's not too late for that.Some think it's later than we know.

 

[anaconda]

Without so much as a vote in congress....
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=26480



Falling under the DOD, and not being required to take an oath.........these guys will be completely under the authority of the president. A force "as strong as the U.S. Military" that answers only to the executive branch.

Is it just me, or did the Rubicon just get crossed?

Alea iacta est

I would say it qualifies as a Rubicon. But I think there have been other Rubicons. Such as the Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, Federal Reserve Act, 16th ammendment, 9-11, etc.

 

[PatriotLegion]

I agree that many lines have been crossed, what is it going to take for a mass demonstration on DC? How many patriots live within driving distance to DC that can demonstrate that we are the people and we would stand for a Nanny State, forced labor, or what ever genius ideas that King BO has blessed us with.

 

[sevin]

Can anyone confirm this with a link to an official government site? The only proof in the article are links to infowars and prisonplanet, one of which doesn't even work.

 

[Lucille]

Can anyone confirm this with a link to an official government site? The only proof in the article are links to infowars and prisonplanet, one of which doesn't even work.

It has a DoD link.

 

[LiveToWin]

We already have a Civilians Military

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNZrAe0IuNk

 

[Catatonic]

How is this not a private army?

 

[Cinderella]

::just shit her pants::

 

[pacelli]

The directive, which is effective immediately, states that civilian employees of the DoD will be asked to sign agreements stating that they will deploy in support of military missions for up to two years if needed.

First, it impacts civilian employees of the DoD. Not all civilian employees in the US. Second, they must agree by signature to the directive.

 

[constituent]

what is it going to take for a mass demonstration on DC?

lol, they already had one, it was called "the inauguration."

 

[Dequeant]

First, it impacts civilian employees of the DoD. Not all civilian employees in the US. Second, they must agree by signature to the directive.

Management retains the authority to direct and assign civilian employees, either voluntarily, involuntarily, or on an unexpected basis to accomplish the DoD mission.

Involuntarily doesn't sound very optional to me. Even if it were, while they may be "asking" current employees.......it will undoubtedly affect the decision to hire someone or not eventually. When that happens, while it may be "optional" on paper, in practice, you don't get the job without agreeing.

After all, Obama can't have a force "as strong as the U.S. Military" without that force being able to deploy.

 

[Catatonic]

Isn't this just an update to existing policy?

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/140410p.pdf

"Reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 1404.10 (Reference (a)) under a new title to establish the policy through which an appropriately sized subset of the DoD civilian workforce is pre-identified to be organized, trained, and equipped in a manner that facilitates the use of their capabilities for operational requirements. These requirements are typically away from the
normal work locations of DoD civilians, or in situations where other civilians may be evacuated to assist military forces where the use of DoD civilians is appropriate. These employees shall be collectively known as the DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce. Members of the DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce shall be organized, trained, cleared, equipped, and ready to deploy in support of combat operations by the military; contingencies; emergency operations; humanitarian missions; disaster relief; restoration of order; drug interdiction; and stability operations of the Department of Defense in accordance with DoDD 3000.05 (Reference (b)). "

 

[Dequeant]

Isn't this just an update to existing policy?

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/140410p.pdf

"Reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 1404.10 (Reference (a)) under a new title to establish the policy through which an appropriately sized subset of the DoD civilian workforce is pre-identified to be organized, trained, and equipped in a manner that facilitates the use of their capabilities for operational requirements. These requirements are typically away from the
normal work locations of DoD civilians, or in situations where other civilians may be evacuated to assist military forces where the use of DoD civilians is appropriate. These employees shall be collectively known as the DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce. Members of the DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce shall be organized, trained, cleared, equipped, and ready to deploy in support of combat operations by the military; contingencies; emergency operations; humanitarian missions; disaster relief; restoration of order; drug interdiction; and stability operations of the Department of Defense in accordance with DoDD 3000.05 (Reference (b)). "

That IS the item we are talking about. Look at the date on the document.

 

[Aratus]

skills draft? expeditionary force? citizens militia? like national guard units may come home?

 

[Catatonic]

That IS the item we are talking about. Look at the date on the document.

Crap, you're right. So how exactly is this new directive different from the previous directive put in place in 1992? Thats what I was looking for, but I can't find it.

 

[LiveToWin]

So how exactly is this new directive different from the previous directive put in place in 1992?

Sheep will line up in droves for this to be drafted because obama asked.

 

[porcupine]

What are you going to do about it? Write more angry letters?

 

[danberkeley]

Communism anyone?