electronicmaji
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 1,224
And McCain continues to attack him. I think this shows me where the two really stand on the war.
I think this shows the public being tricked into thinking there is an actual difference between the two candidates.And McCain continues to attack him. I think this shows me where the two really stand on the war.
I think this shows the public being tricked into thinking there is an actual difference between the two candidates.
There is a difference.
...and they both want to increase troops in Afghanistan.
There's no real difference in philosophy between the two -- to suggest otherwise is ridiculous. Both Senators are interventionists. They just don't agree on how to go about intervening.
...and they both want to increase troops in Afghanistan.
There's no real difference in philosophy between the two -- to suggest otherwise is ridiculous. Both Senators are interventionists. They just don't agree on how to go about intervening.
did he pinky swear?
And McCain continues to attack him. I think this shows me where the two really stand on the war.
The constitution doesn't motivate him.What's Obama's Constitutional reasoning (if any) for removing all troops from Iraq, and where does he want to put them next?
Under the Obama plan, a residual force will remain in Iraq and in the region to conduct targeted counter-terrorism missions against al Qaeda in Iraq and to protect American diplomatic and civilian personnel.
From Obama's website:
So, Obama's Iraq position has not changed -- he's not ending the occupation, and will continue military operations there with US troops. He's going to continue to employ Blackwater. He will not remove all US troops.
Ask him, will he continue to build/support a Vatican sized embassy in Iraq?
How many troops would he leave, and where would they be stationed?
Will we have permanent bases in Iraq?