brandon
SINO
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2007
- Messages
- 15,414
I was just reading obama's foriegn policy stance on his website.
Ok so, remember a while back when Obama threatened a pre-emptive attack against pakistan? He defended his remark by saying a president should never take any option off the table.
Well on his website, in regard to iran it says this :
"Obama also introduced a resolution in the Senate declaring that no act of Congress – including Kyl-Lieberman – gives the Bush administration authorization to attack Iran. "
So now he thinks it is a good idea to take the only possible legal option off the table? He didn't even show up to vote for kyl-lieberman. Why the hell would he try to restrain congress in this manner, when we have already seen that the bush administration doesn't consult with congress regarding it's military actions?
None of this adds up. I passionately hate obama.
source - http://www.barackobama.com/issues/foreignpolicy/
Ok so, remember a while back when Obama threatened a pre-emptive attack against pakistan? He defended his remark by saying a president should never take any option off the table.
Well on his website, in regard to iran it says this :
"Obama also introduced a resolution in the Senate declaring that no act of Congress – including Kyl-Lieberman – gives the Bush administration authorization to attack Iran. "
So now he thinks it is a good idea to take the only possible legal option off the table? He didn't even show up to vote for kyl-lieberman. Why the hell would he try to restrain congress in this manner, when we have already seen that the bush administration doesn't consult with congress regarding it's military actions?
None of this adds up. I passionately hate obama.
source - http://www.barackobama.com/issues/foreignpolicy/