NYC - The chokehold death of Jordan Neely [VERDICT: Daniel Penny not guilty]

Next will be the civil trial for millions, they will ruin his life. Neely family is calling for riots. BLM is threatening Perry.
 
Anti Federalist said:
Not Guilty.

I'm, stunned, frankly.

Maybe the tide is finally turning.
Click to expand...

Excellent! My previously stated hope has been vindicated. #WhitePill

Occam's Banana said:
I'm not so sure he's doomed. They can indict a ham sandwich, but convicting it is another matter. The prosecution might well be "woke", but the jury? Some of them, maybe - but to stymie a conviction, it would only take one juror who isn't, or one who is fed up with all the rampant crime and chaos. (Bernhard Goetz redux?) And surely there's at least a possibility of there being a few such jurors. So I don't think it's entirely hopeless. Of course, I won't be shocked if he is convicted of at least something (even if only as a cowardly, half-assed compromise verdict arising as a result of the jury being unwilling to "do nothing"). We'll just have to wait and see.
Click to expand...

According to Nate The Lawyer's video in this post, one cannot be guilty of second-degree manslaughter without also necessarily being guilty of criminally negligent homicide (which is why the jury was instructed to not find a verdict on the negligent homicide charge if they found Penny guilty of manslaughter - a "guilty" verdict for the latter would necessarily imply a "guilty" verdict for the former, thereby rendering the former charge superfluous).

If that is correct, then it means that all the jurors who voted "guilty" on the now-dismissed manslaughter charge (which resulted in the initial hung jury) must have gone back on that decision in order to find Penny "not guilty" of criminally negligent homicide. Interesting. Was this a genuine change of mind/heart, or just standard-issue illogic and contradiction?
 
Last edited:
Daniel Penny Found NOT GUILTY On All Charges.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRA9LTn1oYo
{Nate The Lawyer | 09 December 2024}

Daniel Penny Acquitted: The Verdict Dividing America

On December 9, 2024, a Manhattan jury acquitted Daniel Penny of criminally negligent homicide in the controversial death of Jordan Neely, a homeless man. The incident on May 1, 2023, where Penny used a chokehold to restrain Neely on a NYC subway, sparked nationwide debates on mental health, public safety, and the use of force. While Penny’s defense argued he acted to protect others, critics claim the verdict reflects systemic failures.

This video explores the trial, the evidence, and the public’s reaction to this divisive case. Was justice served? Or does the acquittal signal deeper societal challenges? Join the discussion on one of the most polarizing legal battles of the year.

 
Daniel Penny Found NOT GUILTY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lx1r6oWNUq0
{Actual Justice Warrior | 09 December 2024}

In this video I discuss the not guilty verdict in the Daniel Penny case. I explain why it was the correct verdict & how despite every dirty trick from the prosecution they may've undermined their own case & thus guaranteed this outcome.

Sources:

BLM Press Conference After Verdict: https://www.youtube.com/live/G9esjeTAD-U
My Video On the Prosecutors Dirty Trick: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiy0R9qVDV0 [see this post - OB]
Charges Dropped News Segment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RR70Fw30zk4
BLM Pushing Violence Again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye83AaM_7a4
Article On The Case The DA Refused To Charge: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...rosecutor-Dafna-Yoran-hypocrisy-revealed.html
Local News Segment With Full Breakdown Of Jury Issues: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2NlEGq1CJY
Prosecutor Let's Killer Off Easy: https://x.com/captivedreamer7/status/1864171758028231081
My Previous Video On Jury Deadlock: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmjXtriAmyg [see this post - OB]
My Previous More Detailed Breakdown Of The Case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ec0lJGboTI [see this post - OB]
Local News Segment On Closing Arguments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCZwcsDZy6I
My Video From Before Penny's Arrest: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6KWvPpzyDQ [see this post - OB]
My Video On Bragg's Political Motive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_Et0OSwh-E [see this post - OB]
My Video On The Medical Examiner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fq0oVwM5jY [see this post - OB]
Local News Segment: Daniel Penny Interrogation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cb7znyonGVM
Local News Segment Medical Examiner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaVkuPAnAlE
Local News Segment With Body Cam Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5MbDR2pW5U
Local News Segment With Immunity Deal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peRWbwQcNRI
NYPost Article Used: https://nypost.com/2024/11/12/opini...ny-trial-proves-no-good-deed-goes-unpunished/
​

 
They're already attacking NYC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w64gKYPzv_o
{Decoy Voice | 09 December 2024}

As Daniel Penny has been found not guilty of all charges involving the Jordan Neely case in New York City, NY. Activists are now taking to the streets angry over the verdict. But what is really going on here, and is this just a grift over a case that most New Yorkers agree on?

 
Occam's Banana said:
Excellent! My previously stated hope has been vindicated. #WhitePill



According to Nate The Lawyer's video in this post, one cannot be guilty of second-degree manslaughter without also necessarily being guilty of criminally negligent homicide (which is why the jury was instructed to not find a verdict on the negligent homicide charge if they found Penny guilty of manslaughter - a "guilty" verdict for the latter would necessarily imply a "guilty" verdict for the former, thereby rendering the former charge superfluous).

If that is correct, then it means that all the jurors who voted "guilty" on the now-dismissed manslaughter charge (which resulted in the initial hung jury) must have gone back on that decision in order to find Penny "not guilty" of criminally negligent homicide. Interesting. Was this a genuine change of mind/heart, or just standard-issue illogic and contradiction?
Click to expand...

Yeah, I noticed that contradiction right away. Has an answer been provided?

I can only speculate...

Perhaps the juror(s) that thought he was guilty on the greater charge were angry that it was dropped by the prosecution and were simply being vindictive? Or maybe they were indicating that the greater charge was the correct one, thus they would not accept the lesser charge? Or why not both? ;)
 
GeZ2YV4WoAAwuUk
 
Brian4Liberty said:
Yeah, I noticed that contradiction right away. Has an answer been provided?
Click to expand...

We'll probably never know. unless the jurors "go public" about their deliberations.

Brian4Liberty said:
I can only speculate...

Perhaps the juror(s) that thought he was guilty on the greater charge were angry that it was dropped by the prosecution and were simply being vindictive? Or maybe they were indicating that the greater charge was the correct one, thus they would not accept the lesser charge? Or why not both? ;)
Click to expand...

I wonder if maybe they were pissed off because (after their initial "hung jury" declaration) they were forced to continue deliberations on the manslaughter charge - and not just once, but twice. Then right out of the blue, the prosecutor abruptly dismissed that charge altogether (and "with prejudice", as required by law) - rendering the whole thing pointless. All the time and contention the jury spent on that charge was effectively completely wasted - and now, to top it all off, they were being told they would have to go ahead decide the negligent homicide charge, after all. So maybe the few jurors [1] who held out for a "guilty" verdict on the manslaughter charge just decided "to hell with it - if the prosecutor can't be bothered about it, then why should we be?".



[1] And I do think it had to be just a few jurors - just one, maybe two or three - who voted "guilty" on the hung manslaughter verdict. If it had been any more that - especially on the high end of the range (9, 10, or 11) - it would have been considerably more unlikely that they would all change their minds, and we would have ended up with a hung jury on the negligent homicide charge, as well. So I think this strange outcome indirectly indicates a strong pro-acquittal sentiment on the jury, with just a few "guilty" holdouts who (for whatever reasons) changed their position for the negligent homicide charge.
 
Last edited:
Occam's Banana said:
We'll probably never know. unless the jurors "go public" about their deliberations.



I wonder if maybe they were pissed off because (after their initial "hung jury" declaration) they were forced to continue deliberations on the manslaughter charge not once, but twice. Then the prosecutor just up and dismissed that charge altogether (and "with prejudice", as required by law) - rendering the whole thing pointless. All the time and contention the jury spent on that charge was effectively completely wasted - and now, to top it all off, they were being told they would have to decide the negligent homicide charge, after all. So maybe the few jurors [1] who held out for "guilty" verdict on the manslaughter charge just decided "to hell with it - if the prosecutor can't be bothered, why should we?"



[1] And I do think it had be just a few jurors - just one, maybe two or three - who voted "guilty" on the hung manslaughter verdict. If it had been any more that - especially on the high end of the range (9, 10, or 11) - it would have been considerably more unlikely that they would all change their minds, and we would have ended up with a hung jury on the negligent homicide charge, as well. So I think this strange outcome indirectly indicates a strong pro-acquittal sentiment on the jury, with just a few "guilty" holdouts who (for whatever reasons) changed their position for the negligent homicide charge.
Click to expand...

Agree. Can't ignore the fact that the Judge and prosecutor were jerking them around and holding them hostage the entire time...
 
Dan Abrams Confronts BLM Founder On Daniel Penny Case.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJzbOpo5_Kg
{Nate The Lawyer | 11 December 2024}

Dan Abrams takes on a BLM founder in a heated discussion about the Daniel Penny case and the broader implications of race and justice in America. In this viral debate, the two clash over whether the legal system is inherently biased and the role public perception plays in high-profile cases like Jordan Neely's. Witness the fiery exchange as Abrams challenges the activist's stance, calling out inconsistencies and exploring the racial dynamics surrounding the controversial subway incident. Stay tuned for exclusive insights, bodycam footage analysis, and eyewitness accounts that shed light on this polarizing case.

This video is a must-watch for anyone following the Daniel Penny case or interested in the intersection of race, justice, and media narratives. Don’t miss the gripping back-and-forth that has everyone talking!

 
BLM Founder Calls For Violence Over Daniel Penny Verdict
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL6BdcrVmOQ
{Actual Justice Warrior | 11 December 2024}

In this video I discuss the many failures from those who now are trying to cash in on Neely & of course BLM's newest calls for violence.

Sources:

Neely Father Lawsuit: https://nypost.com/2024/12/10/us-ne...lys-chokehold-death-the-elephant-in-the-room/
BLM Press Conference After Verdict: https://www.youtube.com/live/G9esjeTAD-U
My Video On the Prosecutors Dirty Trick: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiy0R9qVDV0 [see this post - OB]
Charges Dropped News Segment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RR70Fw30zk4
BLM Pushing Violence Again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye83AaM_7a4
Article On The Case The DA Refused To Charge: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...rosecutor-Dafna-Yoran-hypocrisy-revealed.html
Local News Segment With Full Breakdown Of Jury Issues: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2NlEGq1CJY
Prosecutor Let's Killer Off Easy: https://x.com/captivedreamer7/status/1864171758028231081
My Previous Video On Jury Deadlock: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmjXtriAmyg [see this post - OB]
My Previous More Detailed Breakdown Of The Case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ec0lJGboTI [see this post - OB]
Local News Segment On Closing Arguments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCZwcsDZy6I
My Video From Before Penny's Arrest: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6KWvPpzyDQ [see this post - OB]
My Video On Bragg's Political Motive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_Et0OSwh-E [see this post - OB]
My Video On The Medical Examiner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fq0oVwM5jY [see this post - OB]
Local News Segment: Daniel Penny Interrogation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cb7znyonGVM
Local News Segment Medical Examiner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaVkuPAnAlE
Local News Segment With Body Cam Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5MbDR2pW5U
Local News Segment With Immunity Deal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peRWbwQcNRI&t=0s
NYPost Article Used: https://nypost.com/2024/11/12/opini...ny-trial-proves-no-good-deed-goes-unpunished/
​

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Anti Federalist
Guatemalan invader sets woman on fire in NYC subway, watches her burn to death
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
TX - The stabbing death of Austin Metcalf
Replies
17
Views
93
unknown
unknown
Anti Federalist
NYC - The subway stabbing death of Devictor Ouedraogo
Replies
3
Views
411
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
jmdrake
White man shoots black disabled veteran after phony "stolen valor" claim turns violent.
Replies
0
Views
14
jmdrake
jmdrake
Anti Federalist
NYC-Mass shooting on Bronx subway platform leaves one dead, 5 injured
Replies
6
Views
484
WarriorLiberty
W
Back
Top