Hmmmm....thanks. This gives some much needed perspective.
Much of the spending came after a poll in March from pro-Israel group Democratic Majority for Israel showed Bowman trailing by 17 points.
Bowman has emerged as one of Congress' most vocal critics of Israel in recent years, with Latimer running as a pro-Israel alternative in the heavily Jewish, affluent suburban district.
So it wasn't necessarily the money but possibly the demographics of the district that was the issue?