NWO..... deal or no deal?

[Conza88]

Are you asking for the sake of asking?

Socratic method. Something you don't understand. So how about an answer, to a supremely simple question.

Wow, it's worst than I expected.

You don't know even a 1/10th of it.

Well they mentioned Ron Paul only twice in my media, once when they presented all the candidates and then there was one article which portrayed him as "the Black Horse of the republican party". So I do kinda understand.

You should understand. But considering your previous statements, you obviously don't.

Well sure it is. Yes, nothing is perfect. The UN could fail too I know, in the end they dont really have much authoritarian powers but to send angry letters and peacekeepers. But so far, they've prevented a world war and I'm grateful for that and hope they can maintain that.
Perhaps Bush's little crusade has worked and perhaps not, but it's pretty much a different story than the UN.

Part of the reason for the application of Socratic method is to make you state the ludicrous & insane. Which has largely been confirmed by your believe the War on Terror has worked; eg. there has not been another attack. Even NOT having an opinion and giving a yes / no (maybe it did or didn't) is borderline MORE retarded; or you're just avoiding giving a definitive answer; as to slow your damn education process down. Your logic is abysmal... so how about you take a position on that last question. Instead of the two sided fence, maybe. Think about it, every true Ron Paul supporter knows the answer to it. It shouldn't be too hard to come up. Ask some others for help if you want. Take your time, flip a coin.

 

[BCR_9er]

I have heard the following people call for a new world order (from memory and there are several more).

George Herbert Walker Bush
Henry Kissinger
Bill Clinton
Gordon Brown
David Rockefeller
Paul Warburg

(all of which are bilderbergers)

And then there's Barack Obama mentioning something about an 'international community': http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apqtqp7EKgM

 

[RSLudlum]

I have heard the following people call for a new world order (from memory and there are several more).

George Herbert Walker Bush
Henry Kissinger
Bill Clinton
Gordon Brown
David Rockefeller
Paul Warburg

(all of which are bilderbergers)

And then there's Barack Obama mentioning something about an 'international community': http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apqtqp7EKgM

Add Sarkozy, Cronkite, Saakashvili, etc...

 

[Mesogen]

You just stated the obvious and it is not counter to the claims of NWO. There are real dynasties and families behind this NWO however. Not some abstract theory.

List them.

 

[Mach]

Rothschild, first on the list.

 

[Conza88]

Barack Obama explains the virtue of global citizenship

 

[Roxi]

They have that hidden reptilian strength you know

OMG that reminds me, i met a REAL shape shifting reptilian at work today

oh he was a real pleasure too ill tell you, he was like "i show people things that make their EYES pop out" i have never in my life met someone who believed they were a shape shifter before, i have met some people who believe they are plane shifters when they are drunk, but this guy was a dandy let me tell ya

oh he also teaches witchcraft to the local folk

 

[Andrew Ryan]

Barack Obama explains the virtue of global citizenship

God I hate that guy...

 

[Conza88]

21.52% haven't been paying attention... / didn't follow the campaign close enough.
Tsk tsk. Fail.

 

[Truth Warrior]

[SIZE=+2]A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1][FONT=Times New Roman, Times]by D.L. Cuddy, Ph.D.[/FONT] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]http://www.constitution.org/col/cuddy_nwo.htm[/SIZE]​

 

[Conza88]

Hiki = remarkable FAIL.

Anyone else disagree there is a move towards ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT?

Ron Paul doesn't.... I suggest you fcken ignoramus' find a new forum then.

If you still hold the notion its poppy cock - pipe up then, because I want to hear your reasons... But don't be suprised if I </vent>

= Also I'd love to see those 17 people defend their positions.

 

[Danke]

[SIZE=+2]A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1][FONT=Times New Roman, Times]by D.L. Cuddy, Ph.D.[/FONT] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]http://www.constitution.org/col/cuddy_nwo.htm[/SIZE]​

That needs to be updated. <IMHO>

 

[HenryKnoxFineBooks]

Damn, I voted no deal, meaning i didnt want any part of it...poll is not clear enough.

 

[JeNNiF00F00]

What a frustrating read. Denial is a powerful thing for some people I suppose.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

I think it's real-only because human history shows that man tends toward corruption. Plus, the more power man has, the more he tends to want. It only follows that when man is corrupted on a large scale for long enough, he will eventually want to usurp total control. All the empires I've read about could not restrain themselves. Perhaps someone here is aware of a truly decent empire?

 

[heavenlyboy34]

Hiki = remarkable FAIL.

Anyone else disagree there is a move towards ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT?

Ron Paul doesn't.... I suggest you fcken ignoramus' find a new forum then.

If you still hold the notion its poppy cock - pipe up then, because I want to hear your reasons... But don't be suprised if I </vent>

= Also I'd love to see those 17 people defend their positions.

If you LISTEN to what he said, he contradicts you.

 

[Conza88]

If you LISTEN to what he said, he contradicts you.

Haha, ummmm who?

You wanna join the fail brigade too?

Ron Paul on Barack Obama and New World Order

"McCain was obviously the back up candidate if Obama didn't win"

"They've been positioning Obama for a long, long time"

"You know the plans are laid for him to take care of the corporate elite"

Just a few, now - do yourself a favor... read:

Future is Calling - G. Edward Griffin

 

[Conza88]

bumpets.

 

[Conza88]

Pay No Attention to That Man Behind the Screen by Butler Shaffer

Thanks to Mises Institute Media Section.

To all the naysayers here.. you are not mentally healthy, please listen to the shortish talk.

 

[Republicae]

The first notable referrence of The New World Order was published by H.G. Wells in 1940 in a booklet by the same name. Wells also published another book called The Open Conspiracy. Wells, like Bernard Shaw were Fabian Socialists and the blue print of the Fabians has been implemented pretty closely over the last century. In fact, if you read the Fabian Economic and Political Planning Committee papers you will readily see that much of what took place during the New Deal was spelled out by the Committee in their agenda for economic socialism.

Another interesting book was written by Edward Mandell House entitled Phillip Dru: Administrator. In that book he bascially described what took place between 1929 throughout the 30s with the Great Depression. In fact, in the book he said that the economic trouble would bring about the almost dictatorial powers of a man in the presidency and this president would start something called "The New Era", close enough to the New Deal to make one wonder at the very least.

All of that being said, I am not an adherent of the vast majority of conspiracy theories because I believe that for something to be possible it should be probable and logical. Most conspiracy theories floating around appear to be little more than mental distractions and cause a great deal of division even among those who are adherents.

I also don't put much "faith" in the ability of any group of people to adequately gain enough power and wealth to actually impose many of the theories as they are floating around, besides most governments can't even govern their own countries in a manner which is competent; how on earth would they be able to govern a global system? I just don't see most of the conspiracy theories as a very real possibility because there are just too many variables and too many unknowns they would be confronted with to make a meaningful push toward a global government or even monetary system.

Some people are all up in a fluff about a global monetary system but they forget that for the last 37 years we have had a global monetary system, its called Total Fiat Money and that system is simply not sustainable.

I always like to chew before I swallow...it was good advice when my old Grandmother gave it to me and it still is good adivce.