NV CAUCUS-GOERS: Please post your observations / live results in this thread!

There are so many crazy things happening.

A. It's taking a ridiculous amount of time.

B. Elko went from 100% reporting to 50% and then back to 100%.

C. The entrance polls for Washoe (which were much more pro-Paul) have been completely off so far.

D. Religious affidavits.

Something crazy is happening, and I never buy into conspiracies. This is messed up.

Well, I think Clark County is holding up reporting all results due to the special caucus.

Also, it appears as if different media outlets are getting different results from different precincts.

In all honesty, this screws Mittens as much as Ron. The fact Romney is getting 44% of the vote in a four way race, when he got 51% four years ago in a five way race should be the story tonight. Gingrich pulling 25% out of a Romney/Paul state should be huge headlines. That angle isn't getting mentioned at all.

Also, aren't the National delegates getting assigned proportionally?
Therefore, Mitt is only getting about 12, Gingrich about 7, Ron 5 or 6, and Frothy 3 or 4.
 
482.jpg


1148_1253230725640.jpg


I really hope things go better as the election goes on because results such as these are starting to solidify my belief that most Americans are fucking RETARDED!!
 
It's really, really, really hard to juke the numbers in a caucus. I mean, we literally have Ron Paul supporters there while the votes are being counted. On paper ballots. After our supporters had a chance to speak to every person in the room, and get a feel for what the makeup of the room was.

If the numbers in ANY precinct differ from what our supporters expected, we will know about it.

Your right, the only way it could possible happen is if the votes were driven from the polling place to a gated community where Ron Paul supporters can't follow the votes. That would never happen... Oh wait...

On a separate note, if we had supporters at every polling place recording the votes can you tell me what the totals were for the missing precincts in Iowa?
 
So when these people are there watching the votes be counted are they also there when the votes are reported?

Secondly, if we have people in every precinct can I get the numbers for every precinct?
 
Guys, has it ever occurred to you that maybe not enough American people just do not support Ron Paul?

This is always possible, but on a level playing field, and if all was played fair and square, it's highly likely Paul is doing better than any of these numbers reflect. I think if he were treated fairly, and we did not have so many questionable things happening at the primaries/caucuses - such as missing votes, disappearing votes, results changing, secret counts, propped up surges for other candidates..... it would be easier to swallow that maybe the support just isn't there. However, enough things have occurred to cast doubt on the integrity of some of these events (Iowa) and now here......the truth is we don't REALLY know the truth about where Paul stands. Everything we see outside of the actual voting events, indicates deeper support in places that are not materializing when the votes occur. Entrance polls not matching up close to end results........ Give Paul a fair shake. Don't jack around with the votes. Keep the integrity clean. And then if he loses, fair and square, so be it.
 
ok, we need people to record election night coverage so we can point these things out
 
leave it, no one has to jump to conclusions of voter fraud, the votes aren't even all counted yet.


I don't think people understand how serious the accusation actually is. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And this claim certainly qualifies as extraordinary.

And the implication and consequences of actual voter fraud would be extreme to say the least.

It's not a term you can toss around lightly.
 
Your right, the only way it could possible happen is if the votes were driven from the polling place to a gated community where Ron Paul supporters can't follow the votes. That would never happen... Oh wait...

On a separate note, if we had supporters at every polling place recording the votes can you tell me what the totals were for the missing precincts in Iowa?

How many votes were taken into the gated community? Let's say the worst case scenario really happened there. How many votes would Newt, I presume you suspect he stands to gain here, add?
 
I really hope things go better as the election goes on because results such as these are starting to solidify my belief that most Americans are fucking RETARDED!!

Once we realize the blame goes to the campaign and the grassroots, instead of the people we can start winning. There are plenty of people that have voted for Paul, many of those people would have not supported him in 08. We simply need to improve on the marketing of the candidate to reach more people.

The attitude some of us have here is piss poor. If you had a business and thought your lack of success was because all of your potential customers are "fucking RETARDED" then you are destined to fail. The same goes for a political campaign.
 
Americans like to oversee elections in other Countries to ensure a honest election. What if the votes were sped away to a "locked gate community?" Think there might be some shenanigans going on? Draw your own conclusions...
 
So when these people are there watching the votes be counted are they also there when the votes are reported?

Secondly, if we have people in every precinct can I get the numbers for every precinct?


People had been tweeting them all day by precinct.
 
I don't think people understand how serious the accusation actually is. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And this claim certainly qualifies as extraordinary.

And the implication and consequences of actual voter fraud would be extreme to say the least.

It's not a term you can toss around lightly.

It would be more extraordinary if we weren't notorious for doing this in other countries...

..........
 
Back
Top