Lol did Rubio just said "The most important job is being a president" when he wanted to say "the most important job is being a parent"? Or did I mishear?
Meanwhile the establishment rags (The Economist, Bloomberg.com) are saying Bush did great in this debate, lol
Ed Rollins was just on Fox News pumping the crap out of Rubio and Cruz. He also said Rand should be the first to drop out and go take care of his senate seat.I am amazed how they seem to be trying to pump Rubio now, especially after he got slammed a couple times by Paul. I really dislike Rubio.
Meanwhile the establishment rags (The Economist, Bloomberg.com) are saying Bush did great in this debate, lol
Think THAT's bizarre? Check THIS out...
http://theweek.com/articles/588229/why-john-kasich-most-important-person-last-nights-republican-debate
But then there's THIS too...
http://theweek.com/articles/588216/why-rand-paul-stealth-winner-gop-debate
![]()
But if he does somehow pull off an upset and get the Republican nomination — and the Rand Paul who showed up Tuesday night sticks around — the GOP might just have its strongest general election candidate.
I saw that too.Ed Rollins was just on Fox News pumping the crap out of Rubio and Cruz. He also said Rand should be the first to drop out and go take care of his senate seat.
Fox is in love with Rubio
Pundits from The Week to the generally libertarian-hating Salon credited Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul for winning last night's Republican presidential candidate debate aired on Fox Business News. The Week said Paul was "the calmest, most relaxed" guy up there and won for offering opinions on foreign policy that might have the most independent appeal, vital for national victories if not for getting GOP audiences to applaud. Salon found Paul winningly coherent and reasonable and willing to say things the GOP red-meat audience might not want to hear.
Vox declared him a winner, if not the winner, for making himself flashy and relevant tussling with Marco Rubio over fiscal conservatism and militarism and fact-checking Trump. National Review, generally not a pal to Pauls, also gives him a winner status for being "more cogent and less peevish" than they think he usually is. (A different NatRev writer hat tipped to Paul for being right in opposing a Syrian no-fly zone.)
The Washington Post gave him credit for having a "strong" debate and both the Los Angeles Times and Vanity Fair gave him cool points for being the only person smart or brave enough to point out Donald Trump seemed to believe, mistakenly, that China was a party to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade pact.
Marco? ................................................................................Polo!
Marco? ................................................................................Polo!
Marco? ................................................................................Polo!
...just seemed fitting since we are talking about Rubio.
OMG Salon said something positive about Rand? I think the sky is falling.
Salon says something positive about Rand Paul and agrees he won last nights debate.
Charles Krauthamer defends Rand Paul against Bill O'Reilly.
What the hell happened? Is the sky falling?![]()
I've said it from the beginning. Jeb! was just a distraction to make people think he was the chosen one, when in reality it's Marco.Marco is the chosen one it seems. He is the perfect establishment shill
Although, I'm annoyed that Cruz and Kasich got the most time.. you have to be impressed with how well balanced this debate was on talking time.
![]()
I've said it from the beginning. Jeb! was just a distraction to make people think he was the chosen one, when in reality it's Marco.