NOAA Climate Scientist: “We Need to Do Whatever We Can to Reduce Population”

Forced abortion, forced sterilization, euthanasia, are all the logical outworkings of environmentalism.

Humans are a parasite on this earth. The faster we are controlled, sterilized, aborted, and murdered, the better for the earth.

If you'll remember, the Darwinist environmental nut who held up the Discovery building cited this same idea: Malthusian eugenics.

Don't you mean FORCED euthanasia? Not allowing someone to kill themselves if they want to is not libertarian. It's your life, you should be in charge, especially if you're terminally ill and in alot of pain. You shouldn't be forced to live in pain.
 
Overpopulation and underpopulation ("encouraging" people to have kids). Two myths, both empower the state.
 
How to tell if an environmentalist is legit and knows what they're talking about:

Ask them what they think about industrial hemp.
 
I am really sick of this "overpopulation" meme. Earth is fucking HUGE. If you put every person on the Earth side by side and in one big cluster where everyone's touching each other it would be a little smaller than LA. There's plenty of room and resources on this planet. The only reason there's issues with food in water in other countries is because their governments do a piss poor job at protecting life, liberty and property. Since their government doesn't do anything to protect these things, no one can gather enough capital to develop clean water or mass amounts of food. There's a reason that the more capitalistic economies are better off in these regards.

And we would probably be off oil by now if the government didn't meddle so much in the energy market. If they'd allow for industrial hemp, allow for private high speed rail stop subsidizing oil, corn and that massively inefficient and archaic road system the market would have provided mush cleaner, more efficient means of travel by now.
 
I consider myself an environmentalist and tried to work with environmental groups to solve problems. No environment problem could be solved unless population control could be gained and however this was achieved, the end justified the means.

That's not quite clear.

What are you saying?

That among the environmental groups you worked with, every solution included population reduction, so you gave up?

I'm not following you here, please clarify.
 
And there are some that still deny that the "endgame" is genocide on a global scale in order to protect the earth keep all of earth's resources for their own use and enjoyment.

Global government and control is a means to an end, not the end in itself.
 
Last edited:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

A message consisting of a set of ten guidelines or principles is engraved on the Georgia Guidestones in eight different languages, one language on each face of the four large upright stones. Moving clockwise around the structure from due north, these languages are: English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian.

1.Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2.Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
3.Unite humanity with a living new language.
4.Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.
5.Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6.Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7.Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8.Balance personal rights with social duties.
9.Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.
10.Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.[4]
 
I don't know what this guy is complaining about. CONgress and The Ben Bernank are doing their very best to starve people in third world countries.
 
Although it's probably a long way off, is it actually accurate to say that overpopulation is a myth? (Easter Island for example)

How you'd solve a problem like that, I'm not really sure (genocide is not an option). Hopefully, the people of earth will stop fighting amongst themselves by the time that we reach such a threshold and we can set off into the unknown to explore new frontiers in the universe.
 
Although it's probably a long way off, is it actually accurate to say that overpopulation is a myth? (Easter Island for example)

How you'd solve a problem like that, I'm not really sure (genocide is not an option). Hopefully, the people of earth will stop fighting amongst themselves by the time that we reach such a threshold and we can set off into the unknown to explore new frontiers in the universe.

The Easter Island history is interesting .
 
The green death cult is getting to a point now where I think their message hasn't just infected science and academia, but the wider collective consciousness. I was just watching that new NBC courtroom show Harry's Law last week (I almost never watch TV, but I figured something with Kathy Bates couldn't be bad). Regardless, I became absolutely mortified to find that an entire subplot of the episode was devoted to defending China's one-child policy, and claiming that someday, something like it would become necessary in the U.S. I know that David E. Kelley loves to write about hot-button issues on Boston Legal, but there's usually a lot more balance and the protagonists and antagonists are evenly matched. This wasn't witty, thought-provoking, or interesting at all; just preachy and silly.
 
Although it's probably a long way off, is it actually accurate to say that overpopulation is a myth? (Easter Island for example)

How you'd solve a problem like that, I'm not really sure (genocide is not an option). Hopefully, the people of earth will stop fighting amongst themselves by the time that we reach such a threshold and we can set off into the unknown to explore new frontiers in the universe.

Prosperity and economic advancement are the two sure ways to reduce population levels.

This is all such a bunch of horseshit.

Today about 42% of the world population lives in nations with sub-replacement fertility.[citation needed] Nonetheless most of these countries still have growing populations due to immigration, population momentum and increase of the life expectancy. This includes most nations of Europe, Canada, Australia, Russia, Iran, Tunisia, China, Japan, and many others. The countries or areas that have the lowest fertility are Hong Kong, Macau, Singapore, Taiwan, Ukraine and Lithuania. Only a few countries have severe enough or sustained sub-replacement fertility (combined with other population factors like emigration) to have population decline, such as Japan, Lithuania, and Ukraine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-replacement_fertility
 
The best way to reduce the population is capitalism. All throughout history, after countries experience a free market economy and standards of living rise, the birth rate falls dramatically.
 
Back
Top